DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Adverse Events and Hemodynamic Effects of Adenosine-Based Cardiac MRI

  • 발행 : 2011.08.01

초록

Objective: We wanted to prospectively assess the adverse events and hemodynamic effects associated with an intravenous adenosine infusion in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and who were undergoing cardiac MRI. Materials and Methods: One hundred and sixty-eight patients ($64{\pm}9$ years) received adenosine (140${\mu}g$/kg/min) during cardiac MRI. Before and during the administration, the heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were monitored using a MRI-compatible system. We documented any signs and symptoms of potential adverse events. Results: In total, 47 out of 168 patients (28%) experienced adverse effects, which were mostly mild or moderate. In 13 patients (8%), the adenosine infusion was discontinued due to intolerable dyspnea or chest pain. No high grade atrioventricular block, bronchospasm or other life-threatening adverse events occurred. The hemodynamic measurements showed a significant increase in the heart rate during adenosine infusion ($69.3{\pm}11.7$ versus $82.4{\pm}13.0$ beats/min, respectively; p < 0.001). A significant but clinically irrelevant increase in oxygen saturation occurred during adenosine infusion ($96{\pm}1.9$% versus $97{\pm}1.3$%, respectively; p < 0.001). The blood pressure did not significantly change during adenosine infusion (systolic: $142.8{\pm}24.0$ versus $140.9{\pm}25.7$ mmHg; diastolic: $80.2{\pm}12.5$ mmHg versus $78.9{\pm}15.6$, respectively). Conclusion: This study confirms the safety of adenosine infusion during cardiac MRI. A considerable proportion of all patients will experience minor adverse effects and some patients will not tolerate adenosine infusion. However, all adverse events can be successfully managed by a radiologist. The increased heart rate during adenosine infusion highlights the need to individually adjust the settings according to the patient, e.g., the number of slices of myocardial perfusion imaging.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Budoff MJ, Cohen MC, Garcia MJ, Hodgson JM, Hundley WG, Lima JA, et al. ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Circulation 2005;112:598-617 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.168237
  2. Constantine G, Shan K, Flamm SD, Sivananthan MU. Role of MRI in clinical cardiology. Lancet 2004;363:2162-2171 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16509-4
  3. Gould KL. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. I. Physiologic basis and experimental validation. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:267-278 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(78)90165-0
  4. Gould KL, Westcott RJ, Albro PC, Hamilton GW. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. II. Clinical methodology and feasibility. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:279-287 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(78)90166-2
  5. Rossen JD, Quillen JE, Lopez AG, Stenberg RG, Talman CL, Winniford MD. Comparison of coronary vasodilation with intravenous dipyridamole and adenosine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:485-491 https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(91)90604-8
  6. Belardinelli L, Linden J, Berne RM. The cardiac effects of adenosine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1989;32:73-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-0620(89)90015-7
  7. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, Horstick G, Gumbrich T, Petersen S, et al. Perfusion MR imaging of the heart with TrueFISP. Rofo 2001;173:205-210 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-11604
  8. Spies C, Mohrs OK, Madison JR, Fach A, Nowak B, Voigtlander T. Limited flow reserve in non-obstructed bypass grafts supplying infarcted myocardium: implications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging protocols. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:373-379 https://doi.org/10.1080/10976640500452067
  9. Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M, Zenovich A, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: clinical validation and future applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:676-685 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199911)10:5<676::AID-JMRI10>3.0.CO;2-L
  10. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, Bertschinger K, Buchi M, Knusel PR, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-2235 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.18.2230
  11. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, de Roos A, Zwinderman AH, Jukema JW, Kunz P, et al. Detection of vein graft disease using highresolution magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation 2002;105:328-333 https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0302.102598
  12. Voigtlander T, Kreitner KF, Wittlinger T, Petersen S, Horstick G, Kalden P, et al. MR angiography and flow measurement in coronary arteries and coronary bypass grafts. Z Kardiol 2001;90:929-938 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003920170063
  13. Ali Raza J, Reeves WC, Movahed A. Pharmacological stress agents for evaluation of ischemic heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2001;81:157-167 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(01)00536-8
  14. Biaggioni I, Killian TJ, Mosqueda-Garcia R, Robertson RM, Robertson D. Adenosine increases sympathetic nerve traffic in humans. Circulation 1991;83:1668-1675 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.83.5.1668
  15. Karamitsos TD, Arnold JR, Pegg TJ, Cheng AS, van Gaal WJ, Francis JM, et al. Tolerance and safety of adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:277-283 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-008-9392-3
  16. Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Schwaiger M, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:384-389 https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3
  17. Bernhardt P, Steffens M, Kleinertz K, Morell R, Budde R, Leischik R, et al. Safety of adenosine stress magnetic resonance imaging using a mobile cardiac magnetic resonance system. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:475-478 https://doi.org/10.1080/10976640600575270
  18. Greenwood JP, Younger JF, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU, Ball SG, Plein S. Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Heart 2007;93:1363-1368 https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.106427

피인용 문헌

  1. Considerations when measuring myocardial perfusion reserve by cardiovascular magnetic resonance using regadenoson vol.14, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-14-89
  2. Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Contrast Agent Bolus Dispersion in a Coronary Bifurcation: Impact on MRI-Based Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion vol.2013, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/513187
  3. Time Efficiency and Diagnostic Accuracy of New Automated Myocardial Perfusion Analysis Software in 320-Row CT Cardiac Imaging vol.14, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.1.21
  4. Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Safety and Indications in Pediatrics and Young Adults vol.39, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-017-1752-0
  5. Computational instantaneous wave‐free ratio (IFR) for patient‐specific coronary artery stenoses using 1D network models vol.35, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3255
  6. Safety profile of adenosine stress cardiac MRI in a tertiary hospital in India vol.30, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijri.ijri_283_20
  7. Dynamic cardiac PET motion correction using 3D normalized gradient fields in patients and phantom simulations vol.48, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15059