DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Usefulness of C-Reactive Protein for Evaluating Clinical Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia

  • Ha, Young-Eun (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Cheol-In (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Joo, Eun-Jeong (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Joung, Mi-Kyong (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Doo-Ryeon (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Peck, Kyong-Ran (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Nam-Yong (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Song, Jae-Hoon (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2011.06.01

Abstract

Background/Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of initial Creactive protein (CRP) as a predictor of clinical outcome and to investigate whether follow-up CRP measurement is useful for the prediction of the clinical outcome of bloodstream infections in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC), whose CRP production in response to infection may be attenuated. Methods: A retrospective, observational study including 202 LC patients with Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia was conducted to assess the usefulness of serial CRP measurements in predicting clinical outcome in LC patients. The CRP ratio was defined as the ratio of the follow-up CRP level to the initial CRP level. Results: The overall 30-day mortality rate of the study population was 23.8% (48/202). In the multivariate analysis, advanced age (${\geq}$ 70 years), healthcare-associated or nosocomial infections, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of ${\geq}$ 30, and initial body temperature of < $37^{\circ}C$ were significant factors associated with mortality (all p < 0.05). No association between initial CRP level and mortality was found. In a further analysis including 87 evaluable cases who had repeated CRP measurements at day 4 and/or 5, a CRP ratio of ${\geq}$ 0.7 was found to be a significant factor associated with mortality (odds ratio, 19.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 276.86; p = 0.043) after adjusting for other confounding variables. Conclusions: Initial CRP level did not predict mortality of sepsis in LC patients. However, serial CRP measurements during the first week of antimicrobial therapy may be useful as a prognostic factor for mortality in LC patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Hurlimann J, Thorbecke GJ, Hochwald GM. The liver as the site of C-reactive protein formation. J Exp Med 1966;123:365-378. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.123.2.365
  2. Park WB, Lee KD, Lee CS, et al. Production of C-reactive protein in Escherichia coli-infected patients with liver dysfunction due to liver cirrhosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;51:227-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.11.014
  3. Mackenzie I, Woodhouse J. C-reactive protein concentrations during bacteraemia: a comparison between patients with and without liver dysfunction. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:1344-1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0251-1
  4. Le Moine O, Deviere J, Devaster JM, et al. Interleukin-6: an early marker of bacterial infection in decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1994;20:819-824.
  5. Povoa P, Coelho L, Almeida E, et al. Pilot study evaluating C-reactive protein levels in the assessment of response to treatment of severe bloodstream infection. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:1855-1857. https://doi.org/10.1086/430382
  6. Povoa P, Coelho L, Almeida E, et al. C-reactive protein as a marker of infection in critically ill patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005;11:101-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01044.x
  7. Chalmers JD, Singanayagam A, Hill AT. C-reactive protein is an independent predictor of severity in community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med 2008;121:219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.10.033
  8. Coelho L, Povoa P, Almeida E, et al. Usefulness of C-reactive protein in monitoring the severe community-acquired pneumonia clinical course. Crit Care 2007;11:R92. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6105
  9. Povoa P, Coelho L, Almeida E, et al. C-reactive protein as a marker of ventilator-associated pneumonia resolution: a pilot study. Eur Respir J 2005;25:804-812. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00071704
  10. Verhagen DW, Hermanides J, Korevaar JC, et al. Prognostic value of serial C-reactive protein measurements in left-sided native valve endocarditis. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:302-307. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2007.73
  11. Friedman ND, Kaye KS, Stout JE, et al. Health care--associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:791-797. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-10-200211190-00007
  12. Lucey MR, Brown KA, Everson GT, et al. Minimal criteria for placement of adults on the liver transplant waiting list: a report of a national conference organized by the American Society of Transplant Physicians and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver Transpl Surg 1997;3:628-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.500030613
  13. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure: On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709751
  14. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2001;33:464-470. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2001.22172
  15. Chow JW, Yu VL. Combination antibiotic therapy versus monotherapy for gram-negative bacteraemia: a commentary. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999;11:7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(98)00060-0
  16. Ibrahim EH, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest 2000;118:146-155. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.118.1.146

Cited by

  1. Diagnostic usefulness of procalcitonin as a marker of bacteremia in patients with acute pyelonephritis vol.73, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2013.803231
  2. Prognostic value of C‐reactive protein levels in patients with cirrhosis vol.21, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24088
  3. Presepsin teardown - pitfalls of biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of bacterial infection in cirrhosis vol.22, pp.41, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i41.9172
  4. Fluid Biomarkers for Predicting the Prognosis of Liver Cirrhosis vol.2020, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7170457
  5. A risk score based on pediatric sequential organ failure assessment predicts 90-day mortality in children with Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection vol.20, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05644-w
  6. Serum C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of survival in cirrhotic patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and bacterial infection vol.40, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-020-01134-8