Hip & pelvis

The Korean Hip Society (대한고관절학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Sandwich Type in Ceramic-Ceramic Articulation (Minimum 10-Year Follow up Results)

샌드위치 타입의 세라믹-세라믹 관절면을 이용한 일차성 무시멘트 고관절 전치환술 (최소 10년 추시 결과)

  • Yoon, Ui-Seoung (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Min, Hak-Jin (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Seo, Jae-Sung (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Soo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Lim, Byung-Ho (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Joon-Yub (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Oh, Hyun-Seok (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Seok, Ju-Pil (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Yub (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center)
  • 윤의성 (서울의료원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 민학진 (서울의료원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 서재성 (서울의료원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 김진수 (서울의료원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 임병호 (서울의료원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 김준엽 (서울의료원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 오현석 (서울의료원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 석주필 (서울의료원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 백승엽 (서울의료원 정형외과학교실)
  • Published : 2011.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the minimum 10-year follow up results of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using a sandwich-type (alumina-polyethylene-titanium) ceramic bearing. Materials and Methods: Thirty four patients (40 hips) who underwent a THA with sandwich typed liners from November 1998 to December 2000 were analyzed. Among the 34 patients, 25 were men and nine were women. Mean follow-up was 134 months (range, 120~145 months) and mean patient age at the time of THA was 47.1 years (range, 24~65 years). The clinical results were evaluated using the Harris hip score and level of thigh pain with a limping gait. The radiographic evaluation was done in terms of the endosteal new bone formation, radiolucent line, subsidence of the stem, migration of the acetabular cup, and proof of loosening. Results: The mean preoperative Harris hip score of 50.2 points (range, 31~87 points) was improved to 90.9 points (range, 75~99 points) at the final follow-up and thigh pain with limping gait in one case. All cases had fixation by bony ingrowth. No radiographically detectable loosening was observed in any hip. Fracture of ceramic liner in one case required change of the polyethylene liner. Conclusion: At the minimum 10-year follow up, survival rate as the end-point was favorable. However, fracture of the ceramic is still a major problem. Satisfactory results can be obtained by more precise surgical technique for acerabular inclincation and anteversion, and by improving the quality of the ceramic.

목적: 세라믹 라이너에 폴리에틸렌을 부착한 샌드위치형 라이너를 이용한 일차성 고관절 전치환술의 최소 10년 이상 추시 결과를 평가하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1998년 11월부터 2000년 12월까지 샌드위치형 라이너를 이용한 고관절 전치환술을 시행하고 최소 10년 이상 추시 가능하였던 34명(40예)을 대상으로 하였다. 평균 추시 기간은 134개월(120~145개월), 수술 시 평균 연령은 47.1세(24~65세)이었다. 임상적 평가는 Harris hip score, 대퇴부통증 등을 조사하였으며, 방사선학적 평가는 골내막 신생골, 방사선 투과성선, 삽입물의 이동 등을 관찰하였다. 결과: Harris hip score는 최종 추시에서 평균 90.9점으로 향상되었다. 전례에서 골성 고정을 얻었으며 삽입물의 이동이나 해리는 관찰되지 않았다. 합병증으로 수술 시 대퇴골의 비전위 골절이 2예(5%), 후방 탈구가 1예(2.5%), 세라믹 라이너 파손이 1예(2.5%)가 있었다. 결론: 샌드위치형 라이너를 이용한 고관절 전치환술의 최소 10년 이상 추시 생존율은 양호한 결과를 보였으나, 세라믹의 골절은 여전히 중요한 문제점으로 판단되며 비구컵의 정확한 고정과 지속적인 세라믹 부품의 재질 개선이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Santavirta S, Nordström D, Metsarinne K, Konttinen YT. Biocompatibility of polyethylene and host response to loosening of cementless total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;297:100-10.
  2. Boutin P. Alumina and its use in surgery of the hip. (Experimental study). Presse Med. 1971;79:639-40.
  3. Nizard R, Pourreyron D, Raould A, Hannouche D, Sedel L. Alumina-on-alumina hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:317-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0068-4
  4. Hannouche D, Zaoui A, Zadegan F, Sedel L, Nizard R. Thirty years of experience with alumina-on-alumina bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35: 207-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1187-1
  5. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-55.
  6. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17-27.
  7. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;257: 107-28.
  8. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:45-55.
  9. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CG. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. Two-year results of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:337-46.
  10. DeLee JG,Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;121:20-32.
  11. Heekin RD, Callaghan JJ, Hopkinson WJ, Savory CG, Xenos JS. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. Results after five to seven years in a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:77-91.
  12. Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:387-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2003.10.016
  13. Kawamura H, Dunbar MJ, Murray P, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. The porous coated anatomic total hip replacement. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study of a cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A:1333-8.
  14. Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:518-28.
  15. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Martinez-Sayanes JM, Minuesa A, Munuera L. Mittelmeier ceramic-ceramic prosthesis after 10 years. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:773-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80176-8
  16. Nizard RS, Sedel L, Christel P, Meunier A, Soudry M, Witvoet J. Ten-year survivorship of cemented ceramicceramic total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;282:53-63.
  17. D'Antonio J, Capello W, Manley M, Bierbaum B. New experience with alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:390-7. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.32183
  18. Bizot P, Larrouy M, Witvoet J, Sedel L, Nizard R. Pressfit metal-backed alumina sockets: a minimum 5-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;379:134-42.
  19. Lee YK, Ha YC, Yoo JJ, Koo KH, Yoon KS, Kim HJ. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of ten years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1715-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01019
  20. Dalla PP, Bregant L, Di Marino F. Stiffness of the acetabular cups: a comparative study using the finite element method. Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Ceramic Wear Couple, Stuttgart. Enke; 1997. 136-8.
  21. Ravasi F,Sansone V. Five-year follow-up with a ceramic sandwich cup in total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122:350-3.
  22. Suzuki K, Matsubara M, Morita S, Muneta T, Shinomiya K. Fracture of a ceramic acetabular insert after ceramicon- ceramic THA--a case report. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:101-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013752
  23. Hwang SK, Oh JR, Her MS, Shim YJ, Cho TY, Kwon SM. Fracture-dissociation of ceramic liner. Orthopedics. 2008;31:804.
  24. Ha YC, Kim SY, Kim HJ, Yoo JJ, Koo KH. Ceramic liner fracture after cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:106-10.
  25. Bader R,Willmann G. Range of motion vs position and design. Proceedings 5th International CeramTec Symposium; 2000 Feb 18-19; Stuttgard, New York: Thieme Verlag; 2000. 66-74.
  26. Park YS, Park SJ, Lim SJ. Ten-year results after cementless THA with a sandwich-type alumina ceramic bearing. Orthopedics. 2010;33:796. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100924-11.
  27. Park YS, Hwang SK, Choy WS, Kim YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ. Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:780-7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00618
  28. Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Hirata H, Uchida A. Ceramic acetabular liner fracture in total hip arthroplasty with a ceramic sandwich cup. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:658-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00193-1
  29. Bader R, Steinhauser E, Gradinger R, Willmann G, Mittelmeier W. Computer-based motion simulation of total hip prostheses with ceramic-on-ceramic wear couple. Analysis of implant design andorientation as influence parameters. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002;140:310-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-32476
  30. Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Koyama T, Takao M, Yoshikawa H. Influence of component positions on dislocation: computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:162-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.005
  31. Duncan CP,Masri BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293-304.
  32. Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur: principles of prevention and management. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:237-42.
  33. Berry DJ. Unstable total hip arthroplasty: detailed overview. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:265-74.
  34. Woo RY,Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295-306.

Cited by

  1. Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Ceramic Sandwich Liner and a Third Zweymüller Stem: Minimum 8-Year Follow up Results vol.26, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2014.26.1.14