Neonatal Medicine

The Korean Society of Neonatology (대한신생아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

High Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal CPAP in Preterm Infants

미숙아에서 경비지속기도양압과 가습고유량비강캐뉼라의 사용에 대한 비교 연구

  • Yoon, Seong-Ho (Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kwon,Young-Hee (Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Hyun-Kyung (Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Ryul (Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Seol, In-Jun (Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Ju (Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
  • 윤성호 (한양대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 권영희 (한양대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 박현경 (한양대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 김창렬 (한양대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 설인준 (한양대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 이현주 (한양대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실)
  • Published : 2011.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the change in usage and clinical outcomes of using a humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) in preterm infants. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with gestational age <32 weeks born at our neonatal intensive care unit from January 2008 to March 2011 was performed. First, data were compared between Era 1 (January 2008 to February 2009) and Era 2 (March 2009 to March 2011) to describe the increased usage of HHFNC. Second, the patients (gestational age 25-30 weeks) were divided into two groups to compare clinical outcomes. nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and HHFNC groups who received either NCPAP or HHFNC as a respiratory support within 14 days of birth. Results: Compared to Era 1, HHFNC usage increased from 10 to 55% in Era 2, whereas NCPAP usage decreased from 40 to 5%. No difference in pulmonary or adverse outcomes including the incidence of reintubation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), days on oxygen and a ventilator, and other outcomes was observed between the HHFNC and NCPAP groups. Days to reach full feed (32.2${\pm}$16.7 vs. 24.7${\pm}$10.2, P=0.05) and regain birth weight (20.9${\pm}$16.9 vs. 17.2${\pm}$4.3, P=0.04) decreased in the HHFNC group. Conclusion: HHFNC was feasible and did not differ in respiratory and other outcomes, but days to reach full feed and regain birth weight decreased in the HHFNC, when compared with the NCPAP. An additional prospective multicenter designed study is needed to better define safety and efficacy of HHFNC.

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 미숙아에서 HHFNC를 이용한 보조환기요법의 사용 빈도와 예후에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 2008년 1월부터 2011년 3월까지 서울 한양대학교 신생아 중환자실에 입원한 재태주령 32주 미만의 환아들을 대상으로 의무기록을 후향적으로 분석하였다. 첫 번째 2008년 1월부터 2009년 2월까지를 Era 1, 2009년 3월부터 2011년 3월까지를 Era 2으로 구분하여 두 기간 동안 HHFNC 사용 빈도의 변화에 대해 조사하였다. 두 번째로 재태주령 25-30주 미만 환아들 중 출생 14일 이내 보조환기요법으로 NCPAP 또는 HHFNC를 적용 받았던 두 그룹의 임상경과를 비교하였다. 결과: Era 1과 비교해서 HHFNC의 사용은 10에서 55%으로 증가하였고, NCPAP의 사용은 40에서 5%으로 Era 2에서 감소하였다. 재삽관률과 BPD 그리고 산소나 인공환기기를 적용 받은 기간에서는 두 그룹에서 차이가 없었고, 기타 미숙아 합병증에서도 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 그러나 완전 장관 수유까지 걸린 시간과 출생체중으로 회복되는데 걸린 시간이 HHFNC를 적용한 그룹에서 감소하였다. 고찰: HHFNC이 미숙아에서 잘 적용되었고, NCPAP과 비교하여 임상 경과에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았으나 완전 장관 수유까지 걸린 시간과 출생체중으로 회복되는데 걸린 시간을 줄였다. 향후 전향적인 다기관 연구를 통하여 HHFNC의 안정성과 효과에 대한 연구가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Clermont G, Griffen MF, Clark RH. Epidemiology of neonatal respiratory failure in the United States: projections from California and New York. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2001;164:1154-60. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.7.2012126
  2. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2008;358:700-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa072788
  3. Narendran V, Donovan EF, Hoath SB, Akinbi HT, Steichen JJ, Jobe AH. Early bubble CPAP and outcomes in ELBW preterm infants. J Perinatol 2003;23:195-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210904
  4. Waugh JB, Granger WM. An evaluation of 2 new devices for nasal high-flow gas therapy. Respir Care 2004;49:902-6.
  5. Finer NN. Nasal cannula use in the preterm infant: oxygen or pressure? J Pediatr 2005;116:1216-7. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1741
  6. Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Mammel MC. Observational study of humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr 2009;154:177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.07.021
  7. Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1723-9. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060
  8. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weight less than 1,500 g. J Pediatr 1978;92:529-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80282-0
  9. Kamitsuka MD, Horton MK, Wiliams MA. The incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis after introducing standardized feeding schedules for infants between 1250 g and 2500 grams and less than 35 weeks of gestation. Pediartics 2000;105:379-84.
  10. Hahn WH, Chang JY, Bae CW. Birth statistics and mortality rates for neonatal intensive care units in Korea during 2007: collective results from 57 hospitals. J Korean Soc Neonatol 2009;16:36-47.
  11. Rodriguez RJ. Management of respiratory distress syndrome: an update. Respir Care 2003;48:279-86.
  12. Aly H, Milner JD, Patel K, El-Mohandes AA. Does the experience with the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure improve over time in extremely low birth weight infants? Pediatrics 2004;114:697-702. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2003-0572-L
  13. Campbell DM, Shah PS, Shah V, Kelly EN. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants. J Perinatol 2006;26:546-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211561
  14. Robertson NJ, McCarthy LS, Hamilton PA, Moss AL. Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996;75:F209-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.75.3.F209
  15. Kopelman AE, Holbert D. Use of oxygen cannulas in extremely low birthweight infants is associated with mucosal trauma and bleeding, and possibly with coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis. J Perinatol 2003;23:94-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210865
  16. Holleman Durav D, Kaupie D, Weiss MG. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula: use and a neonatal early extubation protocol. J Perinatol 2007;27:776-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211825
  17. Dani C, Pratesi S, Migliori C, Bertini G. High flow nasal cannula therapy as respiratory support in the preterm infant. Pediatric Pulmonol 2009;44:629-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.21051
  18. Woodhead DD, Lambert DK, Clark JM, Christensen RD. Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation: a prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial. J Perinatol 2006;26:481-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211543
  19. Finer NN, Mannino FL. High-flow nasal cannula: a kinder, gentle CPAP? J Pediatr 2009;154:160-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.08.021
  20. Locke RG, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH, Rubenstein SD, Greenspan JS. Inadvertent administration of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow. J Pediatrics 1993;91:135-8.
  21. Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson Mason A, Osiovich.H. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatrics 2001;107:1081-3. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.5.1081
  22. Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnall RA. Heated, humidified high flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure? Pediatrics 2008;121:82-8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0957
  23. Saslow JG, Aghai ZH, Nakhla TA, Hart JJ, Lawrysh R, Stahl GE, et.al. Work of breathing using high-flow nasal cannula in preterm Infants. J Perinatol 2006;26:476-80. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211530
  24. Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, DiGeronimo RJ. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol 2007;27:85-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211647
  25. Lee HY, Lee GY, Kim MJ, Jeon GW, Shim JW, Chang YS, et al. The effect of early enteral trophic feeding within 24 hours after birth in extremely low birth weight infants of 26 weeks and less, and birth weight below 1,000 g. J Korean Soc Neonatol 2007;14:59-65.
  26. Jaile JC, Levin T, Wung JT, Abramson SJ, Ruzal-Shapiro C, Berdon WE. Benign gaseous distension of the bowel in premature infants treated with nasal continuous airway pressure: a study of contributing factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:125-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.158.1.1727337
  27. Gounaris A, Costalos C, Varchalama L, Kokori P, Kolovou E, Alexiou N. Gastric emptying in very-low-birth-weight infants treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr 2004;145:508-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.06.030
  28. Kim JS, Lee EJ. Effect of optimal humidification for extremely low birth weight infants during Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. J Korean Acad Child Health Nurs 2011;17:145-52. https://doi.org/10.4094/jkachn.2011.17.2.145

Cited by

  1. A Comparison of Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula with Bubble CPAP in Very Low Birth Weight Infants vol.20, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5385/nm.2013.20.4.422
  2. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen and nasal continuous positive airway pressure and full oral feeding in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia vol.101, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309683
  3. High flow nasal cannula versus NCPAP, duration to full oral feeds in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial vol.102, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311388