References
- Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990;175:621-628 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343107
- Korn WT, Bettmann MA. Low-osmolality versus high-osmolality contrast material. Curr Opin Radiol 1992;4:9-15
- Bettmann MA, Heeren T, Greenfield A, Goudey C. Adverse events with radiographic contrast agents: results of the SCVIR Contrast Agent Registry. Radiology 1997;203:611-620 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169677
- Grainger RG. Osmolality of intravascular radiological contrast media. Br J Radiol 1980;53:739-746 https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-53-632-739
- Grainger RG. Intravascular contrast media. Br J Radiol 1982;55:544
- McClennan BL, Stolberg HO. Intravascular contrast media. Ionic versus nonionic: current status. Radiol Clin North Am 1991;29:437-454
- Stolberg HO, McClennan BL. Ionic versus nonionic contrast use. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 1991;20:47-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-0188(91)90018-W
- Wolf GL, Arenson RL, Cross AP. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152: 939-944 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.152.5.939
- Amiel M, Moll T, Revel D, Corot C, Touboul T, Kirkorian G, et al. Comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of ioxaglate and iopamidol during selective coronary arteriography. Invest Radiol 1990;25 Suppl 1:S141-S143 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199009001-00064
- Bannon KR, Braun IF, Pinto RS, Manuell M, Sudilovsky A, Kricheff II. Comparison of radiographic quality and adverse reactions in myelography with iopamidol and metrizamide. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1983;4:312-313
- Conroy RM, Bjartveit K, Sheppick A, Long U, Masterson J. Iodixanol in intravenous urography: a comparison of iodixanol 270 mgI/ml, iodixanol 320 mgI/ml and iopamidol 300 mgI/ml (NIOPAM). Clin Radiol 1994;49:337-340 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81801-X
- Heuschmid M, Kuttner A, Flohr T, Wildberger JE, Lell M, Kopp AF, et al. [Visualization of coronary arteries in CT as assessed by a new 16 slice technology and reduced gantry rotation time: first experiences]. Rofo 2002;174:721-724 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-32227
- Cademartiri F, van der Lugt A, Luccichenti G, Pavone P, Krestin GP. Parameters affecting bolus geometry in CTA: a review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:598-607 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200207000-00022
- Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 1998;206:455-464 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.206.2.9457200
- Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Bankier AA, Hittmair K. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology 2000;214:363-371 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe18363
-
Lee Y, Lee J, Lee HJ, Park J. The efficacy of Iopamidol (
$Pamiray^{(R)}$ 370) in aortic and extremity CT angiography. J Korean Soc Radiol 2010;62:23-28 https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2010.62.1.23 - Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A, McFadden EP, Stijnen T, de Feyter PJ, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology 2005;236:661-665 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2362040468
-
Park SH, Suh SH, Kim J, Kim EY, Kim DJ, Lee SK, et al. Cinical application of Iopamidol (
$Pamiray^{(R)}$ 300) for cerebral angiography. J Korean Radiol Soc 2007;57:121-127 https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2007.57.2.121 - Dawson P. Chemotoxicity of contrast media and clinical adverse effects: a review. Invest Radiol 1985;20:S84-S91 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198501002-00020
- Manke C, Marcus C, Page A, Puey J, Batakis O, Fog A. Pain in femoral arteriography. A double-blind, randomized, clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of the iso-osmolar iodixanol 270 mgI/ml and the low-osmolar iomeprol 300 mgI/ml in 9 European centers. Acta Radiol 2003; 44:590-596
- Pugh ND, Sissons GR, Ruttley MS, Berg KJ, Nossen JO, Eide H. Iodixanol in femoral arteriography (phase III): a comparative double-blind parallel trial between iodixanol and iopromide. Clin Radiol 1993;47:96-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81180-8
- Faykus MH Jr, Cope C, Athanasoulis C, Druy EM, Hedgcock M, Miller FJ, et al. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography. Invest Radiol 1994;29 Suppl 1:S98-S101; discussion S106 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199405001-00019
- Mortele KJ, Oliva MR, Ondategui S, Ros PR, Silverman SG. Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:31-34 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840031