DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On-Pump versus Off-pump Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with Renal Insufficiency: Early and Mid-term Results

  • Kim, Hwan-Wook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Won (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Je, Hyung-Gon (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Pusan National University Yang-San Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Soo-Hwan (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jo, Keon-Hyon (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Song, Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2011.02.14
  • Accepted : 2011.04.01
  • Published : 2011.10.05

Abstract

Background: Myocardial revascularization in patients with renal insufficiency is challenging to the cardiac surgeon, irrespective of utilizing extracorporeal circulation. This study aimed to compare the number of bypass grafts and the mid-term results and to evaluate independent survival predictors in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing on-pump or off-pump myocardial revascularization. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 103 patients with renal insufficiency, who had isolated myocardial revascularization between January 1999 and January 2009. The patients were divided into two groups, the on-pump group and the off-pump group. Results: The off-pump group received a significantly greater number of distal arterial grafts than the on-pump group. However, the mean number of total grafts, the degree of complete revascularization, and survival rate of the patients were not significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed the independent predictors for reduced mid-term survival were the number of total grafts and postoperative periodic renal replacement therapy. Off-pump myocardial revascularization does not decrease the number of bypass grafts or influence on the mid-term results for patients with renal insufficiency, compared to on-pump myocardial revascularization. Conclusion: Myocardial revascularization with a large number of total grafts has a beneficial effect on survival in patients with renal insufficiency, irrespective of utilizing extracorporeal bypass.

Keywords

References

  1. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusion: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcome research. Circulation 2005;111:2858-64. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.165030
  2. Sabik JF, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, Houghtaling PL, Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM. Equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:142-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.046
  3. Straka Z, Widimsky P, Jirasek K, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery: final results from a prospective randomized study PRAGUE-4. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77: 789-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.08.039
  4. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:797-808. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2003.324
  5. Sabik JF, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. Does off-pump coronary surgery reduce morbidity and mortality? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:698-707. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2002.121975
  6. US Renal Data system. USRDS 2004 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kindey Disease, Bethesda, MD, 2004. Available at: http://www.usrds.org/atlas_2004.htm.
  7. Dewey TM, Herbert MA, Prince SL, et al. Does coronary artery bypass graft surgery improve survival among patients with end-stage renal disease? Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81: 591-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.08.048
  8. Bechtel JF, Detter C, Fischlein T, et al. Cardiac surgery in patients on dialysis: Decreased 30-day mortality, unchanged overall survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:147-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.08.048
  9. Beauford RB, Saunders CR, Niemeier LA, et al. Is off-pump revascularization better for patients with non-dialysis-dependent renal insufficiency? Heart Surg Forum 2004;7:E141-6.
  10. Rodrigues AJ, Evora PR, Bassetto S, et al. Efficacy and safety of aprotinin use for reoperative valvular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:2060-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.012
  11. London GM. Cardiovascular calcifications in uremic patients: clinical impact on cardiovascular function. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:S305-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASN.0000081664.65772.EB
  12. London GM. Cardiovascular disease in chronic renal failure: pathophysiologic aspects. Semin Dial 2003;16:85-94.
  13. Foley RN. Clinical epidemiology of cardiac disease in dialysis patients: left ventricular hypertrophy, ischemic heart disease, and cardiac failure. Semin Dial 2003;16:111- 7.
  14. Morris ST, Jardine AG. The vascular endothelium in chronic renal failure. J Nephrol 2000;13:96-105.
  15. Horst M, Mehlhorn U, Hoerstrup SP, Suedkamp M, de Vivie ER. Cardiac surgery in patients with end-stage renal disease: 10-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:96-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01133-9
  16. Gupta R, Birnbaum Y, Uretsky BF. The renal patient with coronary artery disease: current concepts and dilemmas. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1343-53.
  17. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Gomes WJ, Angelini GD. On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:493- 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00566-4
  18. Osaka S, Ohsawa H, Miyazawa M, Honda J. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients on chronic hemodialysis. J Card Surg 2001;16:302-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2001.tb00525.x
  19. Ascione R, Nason G, Al-Ruzzeh S, Ko C, Ciulli F, Angelini GD. Coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with preoperative nondialysis-dependecnt renal insufficiency. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:2020- 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03250-7
  20. Tabata M, Takanashi S, Fukui T, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with renal dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:2044-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.040
  21. Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:167-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.032
  22. Yokoyama T, Baumgartner FJ, Gheissari A, Capouya ER, Panagiotides GP, Declusin RJ. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass in high-risk subgroups. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1546-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01922-6
  23. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004;291:1841-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.15.1841
  24. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2004;350:21-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031282