한국간담췌외과학회지 (Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery)

  • 제15권1호
  • /
  • Pages.13-18
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2508-5778(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-5859(eISSN)
한국간담췌외과학회 (The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery)
권호 표지

복강경 총담관 탐색술의 임상적 고찰

The Clinical Outcome of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for the Primary Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

  • 발행 : 2011.02.28
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: For choledocholithiasis, many doctors routinely use ERCP/EST to avoid the need for common bile duct exploration. But, ERCP/EST has some weakpoints. So it may not be a first choice for management, especially in secondary hospitals. Therefore, we investigated and reviewed results of LCBDE as a first treatment for common bile duct stones. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 60 cases that could be reviewed by their medical charts and who underwent LCBDE performed by the same surgeon at the Yeosu Chonnam Hospital between March, 1996 and August, 2009. The clinical data were compared between each two groups (1996~1999 vs 2000~2009 years, primary closure vs T tube drainage). Results: Between groups A and B, there were no significant differences in preoperative status of the patient except for age (60.5 vs 72.6). The average operative time was decreased in group B (171.6 mins vs 143.0 mins) and the number of trocars was decreased in group B (4 vs 3.2). There were 13 postoperative complications. Among them, 11 were cases of bile leakage. All of the bile leakage cases were in group B. And there were more bile leakages in the primary repair group than in T tube drainage group (50% vs 8.9%). But, 10 cases of bile leakage were improved completely by observation and conservative treatment. Conclusion: LCBDE is a safe and useful treatment that has several advantages and can overcome problems not solved by ERCP. Fatal complications were not increased in the primary repair group compared with the T tube drainage group.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Moore KB, Adrales GL, Mastrangelo MJ Jr. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Curr Surg 2004;61:294-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2003.07.016
  2. Poulose BK, Arbogast PG, Holzman MD. National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores. Surg Endosc 2006;20: 186-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0235-1
  3. Suc B, Escat J, Cherqui D, et al. Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 1998; 133:702-708. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.7.702
  4. Aroori S, Bell JC. Laparoscopic managment of common bile duct stones: our initial experience. Ulster Med J 2002;71: 22-25.
  5. Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O'Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G. Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 1998;228:29-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199807000-00005
  6. Yi NJ, Kim YW, Han HS, Min SK, Choi YM. Comparative study of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration vs open method for the treatment of CBD stone. J Korean Surg Soc 2002;63:416-422.
  7. Zhang WZ, Chen YS, Wang JW, Chen XR. Early diagnosis and treatment of severe acute cholangitis. World J Gastroenterol 2002;8:150-152. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v8.i1.150
  8. Kohut M, Nowak A, Nowakowska-Duiawa E, Marek T. Presence and density of common bile duct microlithiasis in acute biliary pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2002;8: 558-561. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v8.i3.558
  9. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Rosenthal R, Hiatt J. Cost-effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Am Coll Surg 1996;182: 488-494.
  10. Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, Standage BA, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL. Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2001;15:4-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000322
  11. Schirmer BD, Winters KL, Edlich RF. Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2005;15:329-338. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v15.i3.90
  12. Riciardi R, Islam S, Canete JJ, Arcand PL, Stoker ME. Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2003;17:19-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8925-4
  13. Tai CK, Tang CN, Ha JP, Chau CH, Siu WT, Li MK. Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2004;18:910-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8216-8
  14. Tranter SE, Thompson MH. Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 2002;89:1495-1504. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02291.x
  15. Phillips EH, Liberman M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Rosenthal RJ, Hiatt JR. Bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era. Is preoperative sphincterotomy necessary? Arch Surg 1995;130: 880-885. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430080082013
  16. Gholipour C, Shalchi RA, Abassi M. Efficacy and safety of early laparoscopic common bile duct exploration as primary procedure in acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007;17:634-638. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.0199
  17. Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, et al. E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 1999;13:952-957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901145
  18. Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP. Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 1998;351:159-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09175-7
  19. Suc B, Escat J, Cherqui D, et al. Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 1998;133:702-708. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.7.702
  20. Lin LF, Siauw CP, Ho KS, Tung JC. ERCP in post-Billroth II gastrectomy patients: emphasis on technique. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:144-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00785.x
  21. Lobo DN, Balfour TW, Iftikhar SY. Periampullary diverticula: consequences of failed ERCP. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998;80:326-331.
  22. Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K. Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 1998;12:16-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900585
  23. Gigot JF, Navez B, Etienne J, et al. A stratified intraoperative surgical strategy is mandatory during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stones. Lessons and limits from an initial experience of 92 patients. Surg Endosc 1997;11:722-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900436
  24. Dorman JP, Franklin ME Jr, Glass JL. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy. An effective and efficient method of treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 1998;12:926-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900748
  25. Crawford DL, Phillips EH. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. World J Surg 1999;23:343-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012308
  26. Thompson MH, Tranter SE. All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 2002;89:1608-1612. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02298.x
  27. Garteiz Martinez D, Sanchez AW, Lopez Acosta ME. Laparoscopic T-tube choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis. JSLS 2008;12:326-331.
  28. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(1):CD005640.
  29. Akyurek N, Salman B, Irkorucu O. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery. JSLS 2005;9:178-183.