DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

VALIDATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR QUANTIFICATION OF AORTIC ROOT GEOMETRY: COMPARISON WITH MULTI-DETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

  • Park, Jin-Sun (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Yong-Woo (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Jeoung-Sook (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Hyoung-Mo (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Hong-Seok (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Byoung-Joo (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, So-Yeon (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Myeong-Ho (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hwang, Gyo-Seung (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Tahk, Seung-Jea (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Joon-Han (Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2011.09.27

초록

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been reported to be valuable for evaluating the geometry of cardiac chambers. We validated the accuracy of 3D transthoracic echocardiography for quantifying aortic root geometry in comparison with cardiac multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Twenty-three patients who underwent cardiac MDCT and showed normal left ventricular ejection fraction (> 55%), as assessed by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography, were enrolled (12 male, mean $53{\pm}9years$). We defined the aortic root volume as the volume from the aortic annulus to the sinotubular junction. The aortic root volume at end-diastole measured by both cardiac MDCT and 3D echocardiography was assessed. Results: The cross-sectional area of the aortic root was asymmetric. At the annulus level, the cross-sectional area showed asymmetric triangle. From the aortic annulus to the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva, the asymmetric triangular shape was maintained. From the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva to the sinotubular junction, the cross-sectional shape of the aortic root changed to oval. The average aortic root volumes measured by 3D echocardiography (ARV-3DE) were $13.6{\pm}4.8mL$ at end-diastole and $14.1{\pm}5.3mL$ at end-systole, respectively. The average aortic root volume measured by MDCT at enddiastole (ARV-CT) was $14.1{\pm}5.7mL$. At end-diastole, the ARV-3DE correlated well with the ARV-CT ($R^2$ = 0.926, difference = $0.5{\pm}1.7mL$), and the two methods were in excellent agreement (the percent difference was 0%). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate both the feasibility and accuracy of 3D echocardiography for the clinical assessment of the geometry of the aortic root.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006;368:1005-11.
  2. Anderson RH, Lal M, Ho SY. Anatomy of the aortic root with particular emphasis on options for its surgical enlargement. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5 Suppl 3:S249-57.
  3. Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y, Lim KH, Rice NT, Goetz W, Acar C, Duran CM. A four-dimensional study of the aortic root dynamics. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:497-503.
  4. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V, Schuijf JD, Mayo JR, Pasupati S, Lamers FP, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ, Webb JG, Bax JJ. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:321-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.12.006
  5. Cheng A, Dagum P, Miller DC. Aortic root dynamics and surgery: from craft to science. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2007;362:1407-19.
  6. Akhtar M, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Svensson LG, Greenberg RK, Roselli EE, Halliburton S, Kurra V, Schoenhagen P, Sola S. Aortic root morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement: evidence of aortic root remodeling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:950-6.
  7. Gopal AS, Keller AM, Rigling R, King DL Jr, King DL. Left ventricular volume and endocardial surface area by three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in normal subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:258-70.
  8. Ota T, Kisslo J, von Ramm OT, Yoshikawa J. Real-time, volumetric echocardiography: usefulness of volumetric scanning for the assessment of cardiac volume and function. J Cardiol 2001;37 Suppl 1:93-101.
  9. Ota T, Fleishman CE, Strub M, Stetten G, Ohazama CJ, von Ramm OT, Kisslo J. Real-time, three-dimensional echocardiography: feasibility of dynamic right ventricular volume measurement with saline contrast. Am Heart J 1999;137:958-66.
  10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
  11. Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y, Lim KH, Rice NT, Goetz WA, Duran CM. Aortic root dynamics are asymmetric. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:400-7.
  12. Rankin JS, Dalley AF, Crooke PS, Anderson RH. A 'hemispherical' model of aortic valvar geometry. J Heart Valve Dis 2008;17:179-86.
  13. Delgado V, Schuijf JD, Bax JJ. Pre-operative aortic valve implantation evaluation: multimodality imaging. EuroIntervention 2010;6 Suppl G:G38-47.
  14. Binder T. Three-dimensional echocardiography: principles and promises. J Clin Basic Cardiol 2002;5:149-52.

피인용 문헌

  1. Cyclic three-dimensional wall motion of the human ascending and abdominal aorta characterized by time-resolved three-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking vol.15, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-016-0769-2
  2. In vivo assessment of aortic root geometry in normal controls using 3D analysis of computed tomography vol.18, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew146
  3. Three‐dimensional volumetric measurement of the aortic root compared to standard two‐dimensional measurements using cardiac computed tomography vol.34, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23597