내치핵에 대한 내시경적 밴드 결찰술의 치료 효과

Treatment Outcomes after Endoscopic Band Ligation of Symptomatic Internal Hemorrhoids

  • 이준영 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 임상아 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 정원호 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 김성호 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 고진성 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 임은혜 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 김창하 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 주문경 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 이범재 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 김지훈 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 연종은 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 박종재 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 김재선 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 변관수 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 박영태 (고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실)
  • Lee, Joon-Young (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Sang-Ah (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Won-Ho (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Ho (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Koh, Jin-Sung (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Eun-Hye (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Ha (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Joo, Moon-Kyung (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Beom-Jae (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hoon (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yeon, Jong-Eun (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jong-Jae (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Seon (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Byun, Kwan-Soo (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Bak, Young-Tae (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2011.02.01

초록

목적: 내시경적 고무 밴드 결찰술은 증세가 있는 내치핵 환자에서 각광받고 있는 비침습적인 시술로 알려져 있다. 본 연구는 EBL의 효과 및 안정성에 대해서 알아 보고자 하였다. 방법: 굴곡성 위장관 내시경을 이용하여 증세가 있는 내치핵 환자 30명을 대상으로 시술을 시행하였다. 환자들의 Goligher 등급체계와 대변과의 연관성에 따른 출혈 점수를 이용하여 임상적 소견을 분류하였고, 치핵 내강의 범위와 크기를 이용하여 내시경적 소견을 분류하였다. EBL 시행 전후로 임상적 소견과 내시경적 소견을 비교하여 유의성을 알아보고자 하였다. 결과: 대상 환자 30명의 남녀 비는 13:17이었고, 평균 연령은 56.2${\pm}$13.6세였다. 증상은 항문 출혈이 24예(80.0%), 점막 돌출 20예(66.7%)로 가장 흔하였다. Goligher 등급은 시술 전 2.12점에서 시술 후 0.54점으로 유의하게 감소하였고(p<0.01), 출혈점수는 시술 전 1.80점에서 시술 후 0.40점으로 유의하게 감소하였다(p<0.01). 내치질의 범위에 따른 점수 체계는 시술 전 3.03점에서 시술 후 1.55점으로 유의하게 감소하였고(p<0.01), 치질의 크기는 시술 전 1.80점에서 시술 후 0.85점으로 유의하게 감소하였다(p<0.01). 적색 징후는 치료전 19예(63.3%)에서 관찰되었으나 치료 후 15예(89.5%)에서 소실되었다. 추적관찰 기간 중 재발은 총 2예(6.7%)에서 발생하였고, 그 중 1예(3.3%)에서는 EBL을 추가적으로 시행하여 경과관찰 중이고, 1예(3.3%)에서는 수술적 치료를 받았다. 시술과 관련된 합병증으로 통증이 총 21예(70.0%)로 가장 흔하였다. 대부분은(19예, 90.5%) 경도 통증으로 2~3일간의 진통소염제로 증세가 소실되었고, 2예(9.5%)에서는 중등도 이상의 통증이 관찰되어 1예(4.7%)에서는 급성 치핵 혈전증에 의한 통증으로 응급 수술을 하였고, 또 다른 1예(4.7%)에서는 통증으로 인해 결찰한 밴드를 제거하였다. 대량 출혈로 인해 수혈 혹은 재입원을 요하는 환자는 없었다. 시술 후 발열은 1예(3.3%)에서 관찰되었고, 항생제와 해열제 사용 후 3일째 호전되었다. 결론: 내치핵 치료에 있어서 EBL은 효과적이고 비교적 안전한 시술이다. 향후 EBL에 대한 장기간의 전향적이고, 대규모의 비교 연구가 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

Background/Aims: Elastic band ligation is a well-established method for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids. The aim of this study was to assess the treatment outcomes of flexible endoscopic rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Methods: Using a flexible endoscope, 30 patients with symptomatic internal hemorrhoids were evaluated based on change in clinical symptoms (Goligher grade, bleeding score) and endoscopic classifications (range, size) before and after the procedure. Results: Goligher grade and bleeding score showed significant improvement after the procedure (Goligher grade from 2.12 to 0.54, p<0.01, and bleeding score from 1.80 to 0.40, p<0.01). Endoscopic classification scores improved significantly after the procedure (range 3.03 to 1.55, p<0.01, and size from 1.80 to 0.85, p<0.01). As a complication, mild pain developed in 19 patients (90.5%) and severe pain in two patients (9.5%). Most (90.5%) were well controlled by conservative management, but one patient was operated on for hemorrhoidal thrombosis and in another patient the ligated rubber band had to be released promptly for pain relief. One patient (3.3%) experienced mild infection, which was relieved by medical treatment. During the 16.7${\pm}$3.2-month period of follow-up, two patients relapsed, one was treated with additional endoscopic band ligation, and one underwent surgery. Conclusions: Flexible endoscopic band ligation is an effective and safe method of treatment in patients with symptomatic internal hemorrhoids.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gencosmanoglu R, Sad O, Koc D, Inceoglu R. Hemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique?: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:70-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6116-1
  2. Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137:1395-1406;discussion 1407. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.12.1395
  3. Gehamy RA, Weakley FL. Internal hemorrhoidectomy by elastic ligation. Dis Colon Rectum 1974;17:347-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586979
  4. Mattana C, Maria G, Pescatori M. Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse in constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:372-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02563684
  5. Trowers EA, Ganga U, Rizk R, Ojo E, Hodges D. Endoscopic hemorrhoidal ligation: preliminary clinical experience. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:49-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70128-2
  6. Su MY, Chiu CT, Wu CS, et al. Endoscopic hemorrhoidal ligation of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:871-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02308-3
  7. Fukuda A, Kajiyama T, Kishimoto H, et al. Colonoscopic classification of internal hemorrhoids: usefulness in endoscopic band ligation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;20:46-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03536.x
  8. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:477-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049406
  9. Bernal JC, Enguix M, Lopez Garcia J, García Romero J, Trullenque Peris R. Rubber-band ligation for hemorrhoids in a colorectal unit: a prospective study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2005;97:38-45.
  10. El Nakeeb AM, Fikry AA, Omar WH, et al. Rubber band ligation for 750 cases of symptomatic hemorrhoids out of 2200 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:6525-6530. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.6525
  11. Komborozos VA, Skrekas GJ, Pissiotis CA. Rubber band ligation of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids: results of 500 cases. Dig Surg 2000;17:71-76. https://doi.org/10.1159/000018803
  12. Forlini A, Manzelli A, Quaresima S, Forlini M. Long-term result after rubber band ligation for haemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:1007-1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0698-y
  13. Iyer VS, Shrier I, Gordon PH. Long-term outcome of rubber band ligation for symptomatic primary and recurrent internal hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1364-1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0591-2
  14. Berkelhammer C, Moosvi SB. Retroflexed endoscopic band ligation of bleeding internal hemorrhoids. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:532-537. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2002.122618
  15. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:687-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048023
  16. Walker AJ, Leicester RJ, Nicholls RJ, Mann CV. A prospective study of infrared coagulation, injection and rubber band ligation in the treatment of haemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990;5:113-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298482
  17. Jutabha R, Jensen DM, Chavalitdhamrong D. Randomized prospective study of endoscopic rubber band ligation compared with bipolar coagulation for chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2057-2064. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.292
  18. Dickey W, Garrett D. Hemorrhoid banding using videoendoscopic anoscopy and a single-handed ligator: an effective, inexpensive alternative to endoscopic band ligation. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:1714-1716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02167.x
  19. Wehrmann T, Riphaus A, Feinstein J, Stergiou N. Hemorrhoidal elastic band ligation with flexible videoendoscopes: a prospective, randomized comparison with the conventional technique that uses rigid proctoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:191-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01551-2
  20. Poon GP, Chu KW, Lau WY, et al. Conventional vs. triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:836-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555358
  21. Lau WY, Chow HP, Poon GP, Wong SH. Rubber band ligation of three primary hemorrhoids in a single session: a safe and effective procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:336-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553609
  22. Fukuda A, Kajiyama T, Arakawa H, et al. Retroflexed endoscopic multiple band ligation of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:380-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02818-9
  23. O'Hara VS. Fatal clostridial infection following hemorrhoidal banding. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:570-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02988999
  24. Johanson JF, Rimm A. Optimal nonsurgical treatment of hemorrhoids: a comparative analysis of infrared coagulation, rubber band ligation, and injection sclerotherapy. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:1600-1606.
  25. Savioz D, Roche B, Glauser T, Dobrinov A, Ludwig C, Marti MC. Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: relapse as a function of time. Int J Colorectal Dis 1998;13:154-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003840050156