Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microshear bond strength of a flowable resin to enamel according to the different adhesive systems

접착시스템의 종류에 따른 유동성 레진과 법랑질의 미세전단 결합강도

  • Kim, Jeong-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry)
  • 김정호 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Received : 2010.10.25
  • Accepted : 2010.12.04
  • Published : 2011.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength (uSBS) of two totaletch and four self-etch adhesive systems and a flowable resin to enamel. Materials and Methods: Enamels of sixty human molars were used. They were divided into one of six equal groups (n = 10) by adhesives used; OS group (One-Step Plus), SB group (Single Bond), CE group (Clearfil SE Bond), TY group (Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus), AP group (Adper Prompt L-Pop) and GB group (G-Bond). After enamel surfaces were treated with six adhesive systems, a flowable composite resin (Filek Z 350) was bonded to enamel surface using Tygon tubes. the bonded specimens were subjected to uSBS testing and the failure modes of each group were observed under FE-SEM. Results: 1. The uSBS of SB group was statistically higher than that of all other groups, and the uSBS of OS, SE and AP group was statistically higher than that of TY and GB group (p < 0.05). 2. The uSBS for TY group was statistically higher than that for GB group (p < 0.05). 3. Adhesive failures in TY and GB group and mixed failures in SB group and SE group were often analysed. One cohesive failure was observed in OS, SB, SE and AP group, respectively. Conclusions: Although adhesives using the same step were applied the enamel surface, the uSBS of a flowable resin to enamel was different.

연구목적: 이 연구는 2종의 전부식 접착제와 4종의 자가부식 접착제를 이용하여 유동성 레진을 법랑질에 접착할 경우, 접착제에 따른 미세전단 결합강도와 파절양상을 비교하기 위하여 시행하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 발거된 60개의 대구치 치관의 법랑질을 이용하였고, 사용된 접착시스템의 종류에 따라 6개의 군; OS 군(One-Step), SB 군(Single Bond), SE 군(Clearfil SE Bond), TY 군(Tyrian SPE와 One-Step Plus), AP 군(Adper prompt L-Pop), GB 군(G-Bond)으로 분류하였다. 각 군의 법랑질 표면에 배정된 접착시스템을 적용한 후, Tygon tube를 이용하여 법랑질 표면에 유동성 레진(Filtek Z 350 flowable resin)을 접착하였다. 각 군의 미세전단 결합강도를 측정한 후 주사전자현미경하에서 파절양상을 비교하였다. 결과: 1. SB 군의 결합강도는 다른 모든 군보다 통계학적으로 높게 나타났고, GB 군의 결합강도는 다른 모든 군의 결합강도 보다 통계학적으로 낮게 나타났다(p < 0.05). 2. OS 군과 SE 군 및 AP 군의 결합강도는 SB 군보다 낮게 나타났지만, TY 군과 GB 군보다 통계학적으로 높게 나타났다(p < 0.05). 3. TY 군의 결합강도는 GB 군보다 통계학적으로 높게 나타났다(p < 0.05). 4. 접착성 파절은 TY 군과 GB 군에서 가장 많이 나타났고, 혼합파절은 SB 군과 SE 군에서 가장 많이 나타났으며, 응집성 파절은 OS 군, SB 군, SE 군 및 AP 군에서 각각 1개씩 나타났다. 결론: 접착 단계가 같은 접착시스템이라 해도 법랑질에 대한 유동성 레진의 미세전단 결합강도는 서로 다르게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift Jr EJ. A characterization of first-generation flowable composite. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:567-577. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0274
  2. Rada RE. The versatility of flowable composite resins. Dentistry Today 1998;17:78-83.
  3. Estafan AM, Estafan D. Microleakage study of flowable composite resins. Compendium Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:705-712.
  4. Bonner PB. New developments in composite resins. Dentistry Today 1997;14:44-47.
  5. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N. Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:189-194.
  6. Burgess JO, Norling BK, Rawls HR, Ong JL. Directly placed esthetic restorative materials-The continuum. Compendium Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:731-734.
  7. Buounocore MC. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  8. Besnault C, Attal JP. Influence of a simulated oral environment on dentin bond strength of two adhesive systems. Am J Dent 2001;14:367-372.
  9. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Varherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 2003;16:329-334.
  10. Cardoso PFC, Meloncini MA, Placido E, Lima JDO, Tavares AU. Influence of the substrate and load application method of the shear bond strength of two adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2003;28:388-394.
  11. Dickens SH, Milos MF. Relationship of dentin shear bond strengths to different laboratory test designs. Am J Dent 2002;15:185-192.
  12. Zheng L, Pereira PNR, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagmi J. Relationship between adhesive tickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 2001;26:97-104.
  13. Shimada Y, Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y. Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent 2002;27:403-409.
  14. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:528-533. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00855.x
  15. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999;27:523-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00008-1
  16. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999;24:172-180.
  17. Toledano M, Osorio R, De Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2001;14:205-210.
  18. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:32-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00280.x
  19. Breschi L, Perdigao J, Mazzotti G. Ultramorphology and shear bond strengths of self-etching adhesives on enamel. J Dent Res 1999;78:Abstract #2957, p475.
  20. Vargas MA. Interfacial ultrastructure of a self-etching primer/adhesive. J Dent Res 1999;78:Abstract #950, p224.
  21. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Role of hybridization on leakage and bond strength. Am J Dent 2000;13:329-336.
  22. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Pashely DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength evaluation of a mircrotensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  23. Frankenberger R, Karmer N, Petsechelt A. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:11-19.
  24. Nam KY, Kim JB, Jang BC, Kwin TY, Kim KH. Effect of dentin bonding agents on bonding durability of a flowable composite to dentin. Dental Mater J 2007;26:224-231. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.224
  25. Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Enamel micro-cracks produced around restorations with flowable composites. Dent Mater J 2005;24:83-91. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.83
  26. Reis AF, Oliviera MT, Giannini M, De Goes MF, Rueggeberg. Effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives, bond strength to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28:700-706.
  27. Shimada Y, Iwamoto N. Kawashima M. Burrow MF, Tagami J. Shear bond strength of current adhesive systmes to enamel, dentin, dentin-enamel junction region. Oper Dent 2003;28:585-590.
  28. Perdigao J, Gomes G. Duarte Jr S, Lopes MM. Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer. Oper Dent 2005;30:492-499.
  29. Moura SK, Pelizza A, Bianco KD, de Goes MF, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Grande RH. Does the acidity of self-etching primers affect bond strength and surface morphology of enamel? J Adhes Dent 2006;8:75-83.
  30. Cho BH, Dickens SH. Effect of aceton content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and microtensile bond strength. Dental Mat 2004;20:107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00071-X
  31. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Pneumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent Suppl 2000;6:119-144.

Cited by

  1. Enamel pretreatment with Er:YAG laser: effects on the microleakage of fissure sealant in fluorosed teeth vol.39, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.3.180