DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Fermentation Rate Changes on Potential Hydrogen Sulfide Concentrations in Wine

  • Butzke, C.E. (Department of Food Science, Purdue University) ;
  • Park, Seung-Kook (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2010.10.26
  • Accepted : 2011.03.02
  • Published : 2011.05.28

Abstract

The correlation between alcoholic fermentation rate, measured as carbon dioxide ($CO_2$) evolution, and the rate of hydrogen sulfide ($H_2S$) formation during wine production was investigated. Both rates and the resulting concentration peaks in fermentor headspace $H_2S$ were directly impacted by yeast assimilable nitrogenous compounds in the grape juice. A series of model fermentations was conducted in temperature-controlled and stirred fermentors using a complex model juice with defined concentrations of ammonium ions and/or amino acids. The fermentation rate was measured indirectly by noting the weight loss of the fermentor; $H_2S$ was quantitatively trapped in realtime using a pre-calibrated $H_2S$ detection tube which was inserted into a fermentor gas relief port. Evolution rates for $CO_2$ and $H_2S$ as well as the relative ratios between them were calculated. These fermentations confirmed that total sulfide formation was strongly yeast strain-dependent, and high concentrations of yeast assimilable nitrogen did not necessarily protect against elevated $H_2S$ formation. High initial concentrations of ammonium ions via addition of diammonium phosphate (DAP) caused a higher evolution of $H_2S$ when compared with a non-supplemented but nondeficient juice. It was observed that the excess availability of a certain yeast assimilable amino acid, arginine, could result in a more sustained $CO_2$ production rate throughout the wine fermentation. The contribution of yeast assimilable amino acids from conventional commercial yeast foods to lowering of the $H_2S$ formation was marginal.

Keywords

References

  1. Agenbach, W. A. 1977. A study of must nitrogen content in relation to incomplete fermentations, yeast production and fermentation acivity. In: Proceedings of the South African Society for Enology and Viticulture; 21-22 November 1977; Cape Town, South Africa. pp. 66-88. SASEV, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
  2. An, D. and C. S. Ough. 1993. Urea excretion and uptake by wine yeasts as affected by various factors. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 44: 35-40.
  3. Austin, K. T. and C. E. Butzke. 2000. Spectrophotometric assay for arginine in grape juice and must. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51: 227-232.
  4. Beltran, G., B. Esteve-Zarzoso, N. Rozes, A. Mas, and J. M. Guillamon. 2005. Influence of the timing of nitrogen additions during synthetic grape must fermentations on fermentation kinetics and nitrogen consumption. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53: 996-1002. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0487001
  5. Bely, M., J.-M. Sablayrolles, and P. Barre. 1990. Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in Oenological conditions. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 70: 246-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(90)90057-4
  6. Bisson, L. F. and F. F. Monteiro. 1992. Nitrogen supplementation of grape juice. 1. Effect on amino acid utilization during fermentation. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 43: 1-10.
  7. Bisson, L. F. 1998. Nitrogen metabolism during fermentation, pp. 153-167. In R. B. Boulton, V. L. Singleton, L. F. Bisson, and R. E. Kunkee (eds.). Principles and Practices of Winemaking. Aspen Publishers, New York, NY, USA.
  8. Bisson, L. F. and C. E. Butzke. 2000. Diagnosis and rectification of stuck and sluggish fermentations. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51: 168-177.
  9. Butzke, C. E., K. W. Sea, and R. B. Boulton. 1997. Of rotten eggs, burnt rubber and cooked cabbage - sulfide formation in winemaking. In: Proceedings of the Midwest Regional Grape and Wine Conference, Osage Beach, MO, USA.
  10. Butzke, C. E. 1998. Survey of yeast assimilable nitrogen status in musts from California, Oregon, and Washington. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 49: 220-224.
  11. Dukes, B. C. and C. E. Butzke. 1998. Rapid detection of primary amino acids in grape juice using an o-phthaldialdehyde/ n-acetyl-l-cysteine spectrophotometric assay. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 49: 125-134.
  12. Henschke, P. A. and V. Jiranek. 1993. Composition of a chemically-defined grape juice medium, p. 92. In G. H. Fleet (ed.). Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology. Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH, Chur, Schwitzerland.
  13. Henschke, P. A. and V. Jiranek. 1991. Hydrogen sulfide formation during fermentation: effect of nitrogen composition in model grape must, pp. 175-184. In J. Rantz (ed.). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nitrogen in Grapes and Must. American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
  14. Jiranek, V., P. Langridge, and P. A. Henschke. 1991. Yeast nitrogen demand: Selection criterion for wine yeast for fermenting low nitrogen musts, pp. 266-269. In J. Rantz (ed.). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nitrogen in Grapes and Must. American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
  15. Jiranek, V., P. Langridge, and P. A. Henschke. 1995. Regulation of hydrogen sulfide liberation in wine-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains by assimilable nitrogen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 461-467.
  16. Jiranek, V., P. Langridge, and P. A. Henschke. 1996. Determination of sulfite reductase activity and its response to assimilable nitrogen status in a commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81: 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb04335.x
  17. Marks, V. D., G. K. van der Merwe, and H. J. J. Vuuren. 2003. Transcriptional profiling of wine yeast in fementing grape juice: Regulatory effect of diammonium phosphate. FEMS Yeast Res. 3: 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-1356(02)00201-5
  18. Mendes-Ferreira, A., C. Barbosa, E. Jiménez-Marti, M. del Olmo, and A. Mendes-Faia. 2010. The wine yeast straindependant expression of genes implicated in sulfide production in response to nitrogen availability. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20: 1314-1321. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1003.03039
  19. Ough, C. S. 1992. Nonorganic compounds. In: Winemaking Basics. Food Products Press, Binghamton, NY, USA.
  20. Park, S. K. 2008. Development of a method to measure hydrogen sulfide in wine fermentation. J. Microbiol. Biotechnolol. 18: 1550-1554.
  21. Park, S. K., R. B. Boulton, and A. C. Noble. 2000. Formation of hydrogen sulfide and glutathione during fermentation of white grape musts. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51: 91-97.
  22. Rauhut, D., H. Kurbel, K. Schneider, and M. Grossmann. 2000. Influence of nitrogen supply in the grape must on the fermentation capacity and the quality of wine. In Proceedings of the XXV International Horticultural Congress; 2-7 August, 1988, Brussels, Benelux; Part 2, Acta Horticulturae 512: 93-100.
  23. Sea, K. W., J. Myers, C. E. Butzke, and R. B. Boulton. 1996. Studies of hydrogen sulfide and acetic acid formation in juices from the 1995 harvest. Presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Enology and Viticulture, Reno, NV, USA.
  24. Sea, K. W., C. E. Butzke, and R. B. Boulton. 1997. The production of hydrogen sulfide during fermentation - 1996 harvest results. Presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Enology and Viticulture, San Diego, CA, USA.
  25. Sea, K. W. 1998. Influence of grape juice amino acids, glutathione and sulfate on formation of hydrogen sulfide by wine yeast. Thesis, University of California, Davis, USA.
  26. Sea, K. W., C. E. Butzke, and R. B. Boulton. 1998. Seasonal variation in the production of hydrogen sulfide during wine fermentations, pp. 81-95. In A. L. Waterhosue and S. E. Ebeler (eds.). Chemistry of Wine Flavor. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA.
  27. Spiropoulos, A. and L. F. Bisson. 2000. MET17 and hydrogen sulfide formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 4421-4426. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.10.4421-4426.2000
  28. Spiropoulos, A., J. Tanaka, I. Flerianos, and L. F. Bisson. 2000. Characterization of hydrogen sulfide formation in commercial and natural wine isolates of Saccharomyces. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51: 233-248.
  29. Thomas, C. S., R. B. Boulton, M. W. Silacci, and W. D.Gubler. 1993. The effect of elemental sulfur, yeast strain, and fermentation medium on hydrogen sulfide production during fermentation. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 44: 211-216.
  30. Ugliano, M., B. Fedrizzi, T. Siebert, B. Travis, F. Mango, G. Versisi, and P. Henschke. 2009. Effect of nitrogen supplementation and Saccharomyces species on hydrogen sulfide and other volatile sulfur compounds in shiraz fermentation and wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57: 4948-4955. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8037693
  31. Vos, P. J. A. and R. S. Gray. 1979. The origin and control of hydrogen sulfide during fermentation of grape must. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 30: 187-197.
  32. Wenzel, K. and H. H. Ditrich. 1978. Zur Beeinflussung der Schwefelwasserstoff-Bildung der Hefe durch Trub, Stickstoffgehalt, molekularen Schwefel und Kupfer bei der Vergarung von Traubenmost. Wein Wissenschaft 33: 200-213.

Cited by

  1. Wine flavor and aroma vol.38, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-011-1018-4
  2. The nitrogen source impacts major volatile compounds released by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during alcoholic fermentation vol.160, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.10.003
  3. Study and Modeling of the Evolution of Gas–Liquid Partitioning of Hydrogen Sulfide in Model Solutions Simulating Winemaking Fermentations vol.63, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf505733a
  4. Hydrogen sulphide production during cider fermentation is moderated by pre-fermentation methionine addition : Hydrogen sulphide production vol.123, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.449
  5. The interactive effect of fungicide residues and yeast assimilable nitrogen on fermentation kinetics and hydrogen sulfide production during cider fermentation vol.97, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8096
  6. Indium Tin Oxide Nanoparticle-modified Glassy Carbon Electrode for Electrochemical Sulfide Detection in Alcoholic Medium vol.34, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.17p586
  7. Resurgence of minority and autochthonous grapevine varieties in South America: a review of their oenological potential vol.100, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10003