DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of Ice Wine Fermentation of Freeze-Concentrated Campbell Early Grape Juice by S. cerevisiae S13 and D8 Isolated from Korean Grapes

포도로부터 분리한 S. cerevisiae S13 및 D8에 의한 캠벨 얼리 동결농축 과즙의 아이스와인 발효 특성

  • Hwang, Sung-Woo (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hong, Young-Ah (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Heui-Dong (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University)
  • 황성우 (경북대학교 식품공학부 식품생물공학) ;
  • 홍영아 (경북대학교 식품공학부 식품생물공학) ;
  • 박희동 (경북대학교 식품공학부 식품생물공학)
  • Received : 2011.04.14
  • Accepted : 2011.09.30
  • Published : 2011.10.30

Abstract

Cryoextraction (a freeze concentration using an instrument) can increase the sugar concentration in grape juice by reducing its water content, similar to the natural freezing of grapes for natural ice wine. In this study, fermentation of freeze-concentrated Campbell Early grape (Vitis labruscana) juice to 36 $^{\circ}Bx$ was carried out using Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains D8 and S13 isolated from Korean grapes. During the fermentation, strains S13 and D8 showed rapid sugar reduction and alcohol production compared with S. cerevisiae Fermivin$^{(R)}$ used as a control. After nine-day fermentation, the residual sugar contents were lower in W13(9.77%) and D8 wine(9.07) than that in Fermivin$^{(R)}$ wine(14.0%). Total acid content was high in the D8>S13>Fermivin$^{(R)}$ wine, in that order. The acetaldehyde content was highest in the D8 wine and lowest in the Fermivin$^{(R)}$ wine, among the three. The methanol content was slightly higher in the S13 and D8 wines than in the Fermivin$^{(R)}$ wine. In the sensory evaluation, the S13 wine exhibited the highest score in flavor and taste among the three wines. Both the two S13 and D8 wines exhibited higher scores than Fermivin$^{(R)}$ wine in overall preference.

국산 캠벨 얼리 포도과즙을 36 $^{\circ}Brix$로 동결농축한 후 국산 포도로부터 분리된S. cerevisiae S13, D8 균주를 이용하여 아이스와인의 발효를 행하면서 대조균주인 S. cerevisiae Fermivin과 발효특성을 비교하였다. 발효 중 S13과 D8의 경우 Fermivin보다 당도가 다소 빠르게 감소하였으며 빠른 알코올 생성을 보였다. 발효 종료 시점인 9일 후의 알코올 농도는 D8이 15.2%, S13은 14.0%, Fermivin은 12.6%를 나타내었다. 잔존 환원당의 함량은 Fermivin 포도주가 14.0%로 가장 높았으며 D8 포도주는 9.07%, S13 포도 주는 9.77%로 나타났다. 총산 함량은 Fermivin 포도주 약 0.82%에 비하여 D8과 S13 포도주에서 각각 0.97, 0.96%로 다소 높게 나타났으며 pH는 모든 포도주에서 3.65-3.67로 유의적인 차이가 없었다. 아세트알데히드는 D8 포도주가 81.9 ppm으로 다소 높았으며 Fermivin 포도주는 58.8 ppm으로 가장 낮았다. 메탄올 함량은 S13, D8 포도주가 Fermivin 포도주보다 다소 높았으나 과실주의 메탄올 허용 기준치보다는 매우 낮았다. L 값은 6.89-6.99로 일반포도주에 비해 매우 낮게, b 값은 4.37-4.54로 매우 높게 나타났다. 아이스와인의 향과 맛은 S13 포도주가 가장 높은 점수를 받았으며 전반적인 기호도는 D8와 S13 포도주가 Fermivin 포도주보다 높은 점수를 받았다.

Keywords

References

  1. The Annual Report of Food Industry (2006) The AF News Press, Seoul, Koera, p 200-205
  2. Koh KH (1999) Healthy characteristics of wine. Food Ind, 4, 20-25
  3. Hwang JT, Kang HC, Kim TS, Park WJ (1999) Lipid component and properties of grapeseed oil. Korean J Nutr, 12, 150-155
  4. Bang JS, Jun JH (2005) A study on wine preference by wine consumer classification. Korean J Culinary Res, 11, 1-16
  5. Chamberlain G, Husnik J, Subben RE (1997) Freeze-desiccation survival in wild yeast in the bloom of icewine grapes. Food Res Int, 30, 435-439 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(97)00070-7
  6. Fennema OR (1982) Effect of processing on nutritive values of food: Freezing. In: Handbook of the NutritiveVvalue of Processed Food, Rechagl R(Editor), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA
  7. Wilson, EL (2006) High pressure liquid chromatography of apple juice phenolic compounds. J Sci Food Agric, 32, 257-264
  8. Pigeau GM, Inglis DL (2005) Upregulation of ALD3 and GPD1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during icewine fermentation. J Appl Microbiol, 99, 112-125 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02577.x
  9. Kontkanen D, Inglis D, Pickering G, Reynolds A. (2004) Effect of yeast inoculation rate, acclimatization and nutrient addition on icewine fermentation. Am J Enol Vitic, 55. 363-370
  10. AOAC (2000) Official method of analysis. 17th ed Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, USA
  11. Ahmed H (2004) Principles and reactions of protein extraction, purification and characterization. CRC Press, London, England, p 350-352
  12. Amerine MA, Ough CS (1980) Methods for analysis of musts and wine. Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, p 176-180
  13. Kim DH, Hong YA, Park HD (2008) Co-fermentation of grape must by Issatchenkia orientalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae reduces the malic acid content in wine. Biotechnol Lett, 30, 1633-1638 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-008-9726-1
  14. Auw JM, Blanco V, O'keefe FO, Sims CA (1996) Effect of processing on the phenolics and color of cabernet sauvignon, chambourcin and noble wines and juices. Am J Enol Vitic, 47, 279-286
  15. Kim GH (1998) Studied on quality maintenance of fresh fruit and vegetables using modified atmosphere packaging. Korean J Post Sci Tech, 5, 23-28
  16. Lawless, HT, Heymann H (1988) Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. Chapman and Hall, San Francisco, CA, USA
  17. Hubbard MR (1990) Statistical quality control for the food industry. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA
  18. Jackisch P (1985) Modern winemaking. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA, p 164-165
  19. American Wine Society (1994) The complete handbook of winemaking. Kent INC, Ypsilanti, MI, USA, p 87-93
  20. Kim JS, Kim SH, Han JS (1999) Effect of sugar and yeast addition on red wine fermentation using Campbell's Early. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 31, 516-521
  21. Koh KH, Chang WY (1998) Change of chemical components during seibel white grape must fermentation by different yeast strains. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 30, 487-493
  22. Rankine BC (1967) Formation of higher alcohols by wine yeasts and relationship to taste tresholds. J Sci Food Agric, 18, 583-589 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740181208
  23. Jackson RS (2000) Wine science: principle, practice, perception. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, USA
  24. Sudraud P (1963) Etude experimentable de la vinification en rouge. Doctoral Thesis, University of Bordeaux, France
  25. Bae SM (2002) Wine making principles. Bae Sang Myun Brewery Institute Co Ltd, Seoul, Korea, p 53
  26. Pietta PG (2000) Flavonoids as antioxidants. J Nat Prod, 63, 1035-1042 https://doi.org/10.1021/np9904509
  27. Koh KH, Lee JE (2003) A study on the sensory characteristics of Korean red wine. Korean J Food Sci Tecnol, 35, 841-848
  28. Zoecklein BW, Fugelsang KC, Gump BH, Nury FS (1995) Wine analysis and production. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA p 129-168
  29. Lee JE, Shin YS, Sim JK, Kim SS, Koh KH (2002) Study on the color characteristics of Korean red wine. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 34, 164-169

Cited by

  1. Quality Characteristics and Volatile Flavor Compounds of Oriental Melon Wine Using Freeze Concentration vol.44, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.9.1347
  2. 동결 농축 두누리 와인의 품질 특성과 휘발성 향기 성분 vol.32, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2019.32.5.485