DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of droplet vitrification on mitochondrial membrane potential and developmental competence in two-cell mouse embryos

  • Kim, Bo-Hyun (Department of Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Su (National Primate Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Sung (Department of Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, So-Hyun (Department of Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Taek (Department of Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kang, Jae-Yul (H-cube Hospital) ;
  • Chang, Kyu-Tae (National Primate Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology) ;
  • Choo, Young-Kug (Department of Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Wonkwang University)
  • Received : 2011.06.13
  • Accepted : 2011.09.01
  • Published : 2011.12.31

Abstract

The accelerated cooling rate associated with vitrification reduces injuries attributed to cryopreservation and improves the post-freezing developmental competence of vitrified embryos. In this study, embryos were vitrified and warmed and morphologically evaluated for their development to blastocysts. Survival rates between the fresh ($96.7%{\pm}3.8%$) and vitrified embryos ($90.7%{\pm}5.1%$) did not differ significantly (P>0.05). The mitochondrial membrane potential of fresh control cells measured by 5,5',6,6'-tetrachloro-1,1',3,3'-tetraethylbenzimidazolyl carbocyanide iodide staining was similar to that of cryoprotected and vitrified embryos. Mitochondrial staining with rhodamine 123 did not differ among the fresh, cryoprotected, and vitrified embryos. Moreover, the distribution of $H_2O_2$, assessed by 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate staining, did not differ among the groups. The results showed that the developmental rate did not differ significantly among the fresh ($87.8%{\pm}11.3%$), cryoprotected ($83.2%{\pm}7.6%$), and vitrified 2-cell embryos ($75.8%{\pm}14.2%$). The mean number of the inner cell mass (ICM), trophectoderm (TE), and apoptotic cells was counted and statistically compared, and although the number of ICM and TE was decreased in the cryoprotected and vitrified embryos, there were no significant differences among the groups (P>0.05). During the cultivation period, randomly selected blastocysts from each group were stained using either 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and bisbenzimide or the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick-end labeling technique. The incidence of apoptosis appeared to be almost identical in all the groups. Droplet vitrification could subsequently lead to high survival and developmental rates of cryopreserved mouse embryos.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn HJ, Sohn IP, Kwon HC, Park YD, Min CK. 2002. Characteristics of the cell membrane fluidity, actin fibers, and mitochondrial dysfunctions of frozen-thawed twocell mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 61:466-476. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10040
  2. Arav A, Yavin S, Zeron Y, Natan D, Dekel I, Gacitua H. 2002. New trends in gametes's cryopreservation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 187:77-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00700-6
  3. Crossarizza A, Kalashnikova G, Grassilli E, Chiappelli F, Salviolo S, Capri M, Barbieri D, Troiano L, Monti D, Franceschi C. 1994. Mitochondrial modification during rat thymocyte apoptosis: A study at the single cell level. Exp Cell Res. 210:2323-2330.
  4. Dedov V, Roufogalis B. 1999. Organization of mitochondria in sensory neurons. FEBS Lett. 456:171-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00951-5
  5. Desai N, Blackmon H, Szeptycki J, Goldfarb J. 2007. Cryoloop vitrification of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development, pregnancy outcomes and live births. Reprod Biomed Online. 14:208- 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60789-4
  6. Desai N, Tsulaia T, Szeptycki-Lawson J, AbdeHafez F, Goldfarb J, Falcone T. 2011. Vitrification of mouse embryo-derived ICM cells: a tool for preserving embryonic stem cell potential? J Assist Reprod Genet. 28:93-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9500-x
  7. Dinnyes A, Dai Y, Jiang S, Yang X. 2000. High development rates of vitrified bovine oocytes following parthenogenetic activation, in vitro fertilization, and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod. 63:513-518. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod63.2.513
  8. Dinnyes A, Lonergan P, Fair T, Boland MP. 1999. Timing of the first cleavage post-insemination affects cryosurvival of in vitro-produced bovine blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev. 53:318-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199907)53:3<318::AID-MRD7>3.0.CO;2-O
  9. Johnson MH, Nasr-Esfahani MH. 1994. Radical solutions and culture problems: could free oxygen radical be responsible for the impaired development of preimplantation mammalian embryos in vitro? Bioessays. 16:31-38 https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950160105
  10. Kowaltowski AJ, Vercesi AE. 1999. Mitochondrial damage induced by conditions of oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 26:463-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00216-0
  11. Kuleshova LL, MacFarlane DR, Trounson AO, Shaw JM. 1999. Sugars exert a major influence on the vitrification properties of ethylene glycol-based solutions and have low toxicity to embryos and oocytes. Cryobiology. 38:119-130. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1999.2153
  12. Leem SH, Ahn EK, Heo JH. 2009. Functional classification of gene expression profiles during differentiation of mouse embryonic cells on monolayer culture. Anim Cells Syst. 13:235-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2009.9647216
  13. Liebermann J, Nawroth F, Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Rahimi G, Tucker M. 2002. Potential importance of vitrification in reproductive medicine. Biol Reprod. 167:1671-1680.
  14. Liu L, Trimarchi JR, Keefe DL. 2000. Involvement of mitochondria in oxidative stress-induced cell death in mouse zygotes. Biol Reprod. 62:1745-1753 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1745
  15. Marti M, Grossmann M, Santalo J, Egozcue J, Ponsa M. 1997. Characteristics of actin fibers and ultrastructure of the contact regions involved in the separation of blastomeres of two-cell mouse embryos, frozen-thawed without the zona pellucida. Cryobiology. 34:94-106. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1996.1983
  16. Nasr-Esfahani MM, Johnson MH. 1991. The origin of reactive oxygen species in mouse embryos cultured in vitro. Development. 113:551-560.
  17. Noda Y, Matumoto M, Umaoka Y, Tatsumiki K, Kishi J, Mori T. 1991. Involvement of superoxide radicals in the mouse 2-cell block. Mol Reprod Dev. 28:356-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080280408
  18. Pfaff RT, Agca Y, Liu J, Woods EJ, Peter AT, Critser JK. 2000. Cryobiology of rat embryos I: Determination of zygote membrane permeability coefficients for water and cryoprotectants, their activation energies, and the development of improved cryopreservation methods. Biol Reprod. 63:1294-1302. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod63.5.1294
  19. Rall WF. 1987. Factors affecting the survival of mouse embryos cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology. 24:387-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(87)90042-3
  20. Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Vajta G, Trounson AO. 2001. Effective cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells by the open pulled straw vitrification method. Hum Reprod. 16:2187-2194. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.10.2187
  21. Riha J, Landa V, Kneissl J, Matus J, Jindra J, Kloucek Z. 1991. Vitrification of cattle embryos by direct dropping into liquid nitrogen and embryo survival after nonsurgical transfer. Zivoc Vir. 36:113-120.
  22. Saha S, Rajamahendran R, Boediono A, Sumantri C, Suzuki T. 1996. Viability of bovine blastocysts obtained after 7, 8 or 9 days of culture in vitro following vitrification and one-step rehydration. Theriogenology. 46:331-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(96)00189-6
  23. Saunders KM, Parks JE. 1999. Effects of cryopreservation procedure on the cytology and fertilization rate of in vitro-matured bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod. 61:178-187. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod61.1.178
  24. Selman HA, El-Danasouri I. 2002. Pregnancies derived from vitrified human zygotes. Fertil Steril. 77:422-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02991-0
  25. Thouas GA, Korfiatis NA, French AJ, Jones GH, Trounson AO. 2001. Simplified technique for differential staining of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells of mouse and bovine blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 3:25-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61960-8
  26. Vajta G, Booth PJ, Holm P, Greve T, Callesen H. 1997. Successful vitrification of early stage bovine in vitro produced embryos with the open pulled straw (OPS) method. Cryo Lett. 18:191-195
  27. Vajta G, Holm P, Kuwayama M, Booth PJ, Jacobsen H, Greve T. 1998. Open Pulled Straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 51:53-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199809)51:1<53::AID-MRD6>3.0.CO;2-V
  28. Vajta G, Kuwayama M. 2006. Improving cryopreservation systems. Theriogenology. 65:236-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.026
  29. Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Mathwig V, Alexander S. 2002. Domains of high-polarized and low-polarized mitochondria may occur in mouse and human oocytes and early embryos. Hum Reprod. 17:393-406. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.2.393
  30. Van Blerkom J, Motta P. 1979. The Cellular Basis of Mammalian Reproduction. Baltimore (MD): Urban, Schwarzenberg. Chapter 5.
  31. Yang MY, Rajamahendran R. 1999. Apoptosis in bovine oocytes and in preimplantation embryos: the role of Bcl-2 and Bax gene. Biol Reprod. 60(Suppl. 1):190 (abstract) https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod60.1.190
  32. Zhao XM, Quan GB, Zhou GB, Hou YP, Zhu SE. 2007. Conventional freezing, straw, and open-pulled straw vitrification of mouse two pronuclear (2 PN) stage embryos. Anim Biotechnol. 18:203-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495390701201663
  33. Zhou GB, Hou YP, Jin F, Yang QE, Yang ZQ, Quan GB, Tan HM, Zhu SE. 2005. Vitrification of mouse embryos at various stages by open-pulled straw (OPS) method. Anim Biotechnol. 16:153-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495390500263831

Cited by

  1. Advanced technologies for the preservation of mammalian biospecimens vol.5, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00784-z