International Journal of Contents

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The New Paradigm of Management in Design Organization: The Reality of Bottom-line Effectiveness in Design Organization's Management Needs

  • Received : 2011.08.09
  • Accepted : 2011.12.06
  • Published : 2011.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study identifies how management theory and philosophy work in conjunction with and support one another as both are critical to understanding leadership concepts and viewing the design organization holistically in terms of organizational behavior and performance. This paper analyses data from an in-depth single-case study at management in interior design organization in Korea. Two new 'most efficient and effective way' to achieve the goals of the design organization has been launched. The first was organizational behavior and performance, and the second a needed new paradigm of management skills. Organizational culture affects organizational effectiveness in design because it can (a) provide an organization with a competitive advantage, (b) improve the way an organizational structure works, and (c) increase the motivation of designers to pursue organizational interests. Moreover, the result of research creates paradigm of thinking that how leaders in the design organization need to focus on innovative and strategic systems to gain competitive advantage and enter global markets; a key inter-organizational cooperation strategy to achieve a targeted goal.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, A. J., Gupta, M., & Raho, L. (2007). Perceptions of Management Philosophies. Journal for Quality & Participation, 30(2), 34. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
  2. Advantages of outsourcing. (n.d.). Outsource2India. Retrieved March 24, 2011 doi:http://www.outsource2india.com/why_outsource/articles/benefit_outsourcing.asp
  3. Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T., & Kerr, S. (2002). The boundryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). Management: Leading & collaborating in competitive world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  5. Beamish, P. W., Morrison, A., Inkpen, A., & Rosenzeig, P. M. (2003). International management: Text and cases (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  6. Bensaou, M. M. (1997). Interorganizational Cooperation: The Role of Information Technology an Empirical Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Supplier Relations. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 107. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.2.107
  7. Bucki, j. (n.d.). Outsourcing disadvantages: Reasons that outsourcing is bad for your company. About.com. Retrieved March 4, 2011 from http://operationstech.about.com/od/outsourcing/tp/OutSrcDisadv.htm
  8. Bustinza, L., & Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L.. (2010). Outstanding as seen from the perspective of knowledge management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(3), 23-39. Retrieved March2 4, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 2243579861). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03196.x
  9. Connelly, D. (2007). Leadership in the Collaborative Interorganizational Domain.
  10. Davis, R. C. (1951). The Fundamentals of Top Management. New York: Harper and Brothers.
  11. Debasis, B. (2008). Leadership styles and information security in small business: results of an empirical investigation. Debasis, D.B.A., University of phoenix.
  12. Dorit, T., & Miri, L. (2008). Interorganizational cooperation: the structural aspect of nurturing trust. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(7), 704-722. Retrieved March 3, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Complete. (Document ID: 1582860301). https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810904523
  13. Faraj, S., & Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), p. 604-617. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014367
  14. Gupta, A., & Hammond, R. (2005). Information systems security issues and decisions for small businesses: An empirical examination. Information Management & Computer Security, 13(4), 297. https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220510614425
  15. Harrigan, K. (1985). Vertical integration and corporate strategy. Academy of Management journal, 28(2). p. 397-425
  16. Harvey, C. (2009). Understanding and Managing Diversity. Pearson Educating Inc. Retrieved on March 2, 2011 from www.ecampus.phoenix.edu.
  17. Jones, G. (2010). Organizational theory, design, and change. (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  18. Karwan, K.R. & Markland, R.E. (2006). Integrating service design principles and information technology to improve delivery and productivity in public sector operations: the case of the South Carolina DMV. Journal of Operations Management, 24 (4), p. 347-362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.06.003
  19. Lawrence, K. (2005). Vertical integration, not outsourcing. Machine Design. p. 84
  20. Martine-Sanchez, A., Vela-Jimenez, M., Perez-Perez, M., & Carnicer P. D. (2009). Inter-organizational cooperation and environmental change; Moderation effects between flexibility and innovation performance. British Journal of Management, 20, p. 537-561. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00605.x
  21. McIvor, R. (2011). Outsourcing done right. Industrial Engineer, 43(1), p. 30-35.
  22. Mc Lauglin, J., Clemons, L., (2004)., Diversity training. Public Management, 86(5), p. 32- 35.
  23. Peterson, R.A., Kozmetsky, G, & Ridgway, N.M. (1983). Perceived causes of small business failure: A research note. American Journal of Small Business, 8, p. 15-19.
  24. Rama, R. (2010). Inter organizational Partnerships. Retrieved Mar. 4 2011 from http://www.citeman.com/12494-inter-organizational-partnerships/
  25. Rawluszko, M. (2009). Communication in the conditions of diversity. Kobieta i Biznes,(1-4), 53-56. Retrieved March 10, 2011, from GenderWatch (GW). (Document ID: 1948593941).
  26. Reuven, L. (1996). Computer integrated manufacturing: A complex information system. Production planning and control, 7(2), p. 39- 44.
  27. Ricardo, E., Dornier, P., Fender, M., & Kouvelis, P. (1998). Global operations and logistics. John Wiley and Sons.
  28. Seungpok, C. (2010). Leadership in Design Management by Prentice Hall's Self-Assessment. International Journal of Contents, 6(2), p. 21- 27 https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2010.6.2.021
  29. Seungpok, C. (2010). Effective shared process and application of knowledge management (KM) in interior design service industry. International Journal of Contents, 6(3), p. 65- 70 https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2010.6.3.065
  30. Sila, I. (2007). Adoption of internet-based interorganizational systems in supply chain management and their impact on performance. The Business Review, Cambridge 9.1, 9(1), 211-217.
  31. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1). p. 20-24.
  32. Smith, A.D., Plowman, D.A., Duchon, D. & Quinn, A.M. (2009). A qualitative study of high-reputation plant managers: political skill and successful outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 27, p. 428-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.01.003
  33. Stephen, W. (2004). Management Theory. New York Institute of Technology. Retrieved March. 22, 2011 from http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:kPnTvLvaaeYJ
  34. Stoner, Yetton, Craig & Johnston. (1994). Management. Sydney: Prentice - Hall Inc.
  35. Thomas, L. (2009). How to become a more designminded organization. DMI Review Article, 20(3). Retrieved January 8, 2010, from http://www.dmi.org/dmi/html/publications/journal/fullabstract_d.jsp?itemID=09203LOC28
  36. Weinstein, M. (2006). TAMS analyzer: anthropology as cultural critique in a digital age. Social Science Computer Review, 24(1), p. 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305281496
  37. What is management? (1999). Retrieved March 22, 2010 from http://www.sunrisepage.com/manage/defmana.htm
  38. Yin, R.K. (2008). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, (fourth ed.), Sage Publications, California