Elliptical Centric과 TRICKS 기법의 임상 적용에 관한 유용성 연구

Elliptical Centric Techniques and Tricks About the Usefulness of the Clinical Application

  • 김새싹 (서울대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 구은회 (서울대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 동경래 (광주보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 권대철 (신흥대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 이재승 (순천향대학교 물리학과) ;
  • 조재환 (경산1대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 박창희 (대구보건대학교 방사선과)
  • Kim, Sae-Ssak (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Goo, Eun-Hoe (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Dong, Kyung-Rae (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health College University) ;
  • Kweon, Dae-Chel (Department of Radiologic Science, Shin Heung College University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Seung (Department of Physics, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Cho, Jae-Hwan (Department of Radiological Science, Gyeongsan University College) ;
  • Park, Chang-Hee (Department of Radiologic Technology, Daegu Health College)
  • 투고 : 2011.04.07
  • 심사 : 2011.06.02
  • 발행 : 2011.06.30

초록

To prospectively determine the diagnostic performance a combination of standard bolus-chase magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and MR angiography with time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) for depicting severity of the head and neck vascular diseases. Over a period of two months, A total of 100 patients(average ages : $50{\pm}8$, male : 60, female : 40) with head and neck vascular diseases were performed on the GE excite 3.0 T units with 8-channel head coil and 4-channel NV coil. Imaging parameters for a typical study were as follow: SBC(TR/ TE/ FA/ SliceThicken./ Slab/ Freq./ FOV/ BW/Scan Time) = 5.4/ min/ 30/ 2/ zip2/ 70/ $224{\times}448$/ 30/ 62.50/ 28, TRICKS(TR/ TE/ FA/ Slice Thicken/Slab/ Freq./ FOV/ BW/ Temp Res./ Scan Time = 3.6/ min/ 25/ 4/ 30/ $160{\pm}384$, zip512/ 30/ 100/ 1 to 1.5/ 23). The analysis of all MR images, which have respect-ively classified two techniques into some diseases. The results of the former were divided into two groups(SBC, TRICKS)with 4 grading of two reader, respectively. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine if a significant difference between imaging techniques existed(p < 0.05). In 33 of 100 patients, arterio-venous malformation was 11% at TRICKS, subclavian vein stenosis : 8%, fistular sinus : 4%, jugular vein stenosis:6%, Middle Cerebral Artery bypass surgery : 4%, p < 0.05). The rest of 67 patients were considered as the results of SBC(14% in the basilar artery stenosis, carotid stenosis : 16%, vertebral stenosis : 17%, central neuro-cytoma : 5%, meningioma : 5%, Not appliable : 10%, p < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity of TRICKS MR angiography in SVS, FS, JVS, MCABS were improved compared with those at standard MR angiography. In SBS MR angiography which were improved in BAS, CS, VS, CN, Meningioma. In conclusion, TRICKS MR angiography of the SVS, FS, JVS, MCABS is superior to standard MR angiography regarding the number of diagnostic grading. The SBS MR angiography were improved in BAS, CS, VS, CN, Meningioma. and assessment of the degree of luminal narrowing on both TRICKS and SBS.

키워드