DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Traffic Management Status Based on Self-Evaluation by Practitioners

교통관리자의 자기평가에 근거한 교통관리 평가

  • 오흥운 (경기대학교 도시.교통공학과) ;
  • 오승훈 (경기대학교 도시.교통공학과)
  • Received : 2011.01.27
  • Accepted : 2011.04.21
  • Published : 2011.10.31

Abstract

During practices of traffic management, the performance achieved was determined by traffic practitioners' ability of decision and knowledge as well as traffic equipments assisting the practitioners. Therefore, sometimes self-evaluations done by the traffic practitioners in a specific traffic organization can be used to indirectly evaluate the traffic management organization. The present paper is to evaluate a specific highway agency using self-evaluations performed among different highway agencies including one Japanese highway agency. The result indicated that the agency is superior to other agencies in characteristics such as performance, activity, preparation for the future, and customer orientation. For more detailed-branch based study, the responders were divided into their belonged branches like headquarter, regional headquarter, maintenance office and research center. The results provided that various deficiencies of traffic management were found and could be improved in the future.

교통관리업무에서는 교통관리지원 장비뿐만 아니라 교통관리자 개인의 판단, 지식의 역량 등 인적요소에 의하여 교통성과의 차이가 난다. 따라서 특정조직에서 교통관리 소속원의 자기평가는 교통관리조직의 성과진단 혹은 상태진단을 하는 간접도구로 사용될 수 있다. 본 논문은 국내 다양한 교통관리집단과 일본특정교통관리집단의 자기평가를 통하여 국내 특정 도시간선도로관리기관의 교통관리 상태를 평가하여 적정성을 검토하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 그 결과로서 국내 간선도로관리집단의 조직이 성과, 활동, 미래지향성, 고객 지향성 등에서 다른 집단 보다 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 그 집단에 대하여 근무지별로 상세 평가를 하였다. 근무지별로는 본부, 지역본부, 현장, 정보센타, 연구원으로 구분하였다. 근무자들은 소속된 근무지의 교통관리 특성에 맞게 다양한 교통관리 요소의 개선 필요성을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bristol City Authority (2011) http://www.bristol.gov.uk
  2. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2009) Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Self-Evaluation Report, Austin, USA.
  3. FHWA (2003) Highway Traffic Operations and Freeway Management: State-of-the-Practice, USA.
  4. Hall, R. and Mehta, Y. (1998) California PATH Working Paper, UCB-ITS-PWP-98-31, USA.
  5. LA DOT (2011) http://www.tract7260.org/pdfs/Tract7260SMBNTMForm.pdf
  6. Lall, K., Powell, J., and Church, M. (1994) Survey of State DOT Perspectives on Interchanges, Traffic Research Circular, Washington D.C., USA.
  7. Mattingly, S. (2000) Decision Theory for Performance Evaluation of New Technologies Incorporating Institutional Issues : Applications to Traffic Control Implementation, Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
  8. Polus, A., Poe, C., and Mason Jr, J. (1998) Review of International Design Speed Practices in Roadway Geometric Design, International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design Practices, USA.
  9. RITA (2011) http://www.itsdeployment.its.dot.gov
  10. Schwieterman, J. and Scheidt, J. (2007) Survey of Current High- Speed Rail Planning Efforts in the United States, Transportation Research Record 1995, TRB, USA.
  11. TRB (1994) NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 210:Road Pricing for Congestion Management: A Survey of International Practice, TRB, USA.