DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Facilitators and Barriers in the Use of a Checklist by Insurance Physicians during Work Ability Assessments in Depressive Disorder

  • Blok, Sebastiaan (Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam) ;
  • Gouttebarge, Vincent (Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam) ;
  • Slebus, Frans G. (National Institute for Employee Benefit Schemes) ;
  • Sluiter, Judith K. (Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam) ;
  • Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W. (Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam)
  • Received : 2011.06.01
  • Accepted : 2011.08.22
  • Published : 2011.12.30

Abstract

Objectives: Depressive disorder (DD) is a complex disease, and the assessment of work ability in patients with DD is also complicated. The checklist depression (CDp) has recently been developed to support such work ability assessments and has been recommended for implementation in insurance medicine, starting with an analysis of the organisational and social contexts. The aim of this study was to identify the potential facilitators and barriers in the use of the CDp by insurance physicians (IPs) during work ability assessments of employees on sick leave due to DD. Methods: A qualitative research was conducted based on semi-structured interviews. The participants were IPs with at least one year of work experience in performing work ability assessments. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed qualitatively. Results: Ten IPs (7 males, 3 females; mean 53 years) were interviewed. Important facilitators, which emerged for use of the CDp, were an oral introduction for colleagues and staff, support from management, valuing the increased transparency in work ability assessments with using the CDp, having adequate time for assessments as well as modification of the appearance (colour, plasticised form) and content (clarifying aspects of the examples) of the assessment tool. The fear of the loss of autonomy, lack of added value of the CDp, high workload, inadequate instructions and lack of time were mentioned as barriers. Conclusion: Adequate introduction to the use of CDp and the fear of the loss of autonomy of IPs need special attention in planning its implementation.

Keywords

References

  1. Stattin M. Retirement on grounds of ill health. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:135-40. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.015669
  2. Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen (UWV). Facts and numbers. Statistics over 2008. Amsterdam (Netherlands): UWV; 2008. 48 p. Dutch.
  3. De Boer WEL, Besseling JJM, Willems JHBM. Organization of disability evaluation in 15 countries. Prat Organ Soins 2007;38:205-17.
  4. Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Effect of functional capacity evaluation information on the judgment of physicians about physical work ability in the context of disability claims. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009;82:1087-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0423-8
  5. Gezondheidsraad. Verzekeringsgeneeskundige protocollen: algemene inleiding, overspanning, depressieve stoornis. Den Haag (Netherlands): Gezondheidsraad; 2006. 126 p. Dutch.
  6. Slebus FG, Sluiter JK, Kuijer PP, Willems JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Work-ability evaluation: a piece of cake or a hard nut to crack? Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1295-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600976111
  7. Kerstholt JH, De Boer WE, Jansen NJ. Disability assessments: effects of response mode and experience. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:111-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500163794
  8. de Boer WE, Wind H, van Dijk FJ, Willems HH. Interviews for the assessment of long-term incapacity for work: a study on adherence to protocols and principles. BMC Public Health 2009;9:169. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-169
  9. Slebus FG, Kuijer PP, Willems JH, Frings-Dresen MH, Sluiter JK. Work ability in sick-listed patients with major depressive disorder. Occup Med (Lond) 2008;58:475-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqn091
  10. Slebus FG, Kuijer PP, Willems JH, Frings-Dresen MH, Sluiter JK. Work ability assessment in prolonged depressive illness. Occup Med (Lond) 2010;60:307-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq079
  11. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med 2009;36:452-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
  12. van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Hulshof CT, Vink P, van Duivenbooden C, Frings-Dresen MH. Conceptual framework for the implementation of interventions in the construction industry. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005;31(Suppl 2):96- 103.
  13. Grol R. Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997;315:418-21. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7105.418
  14. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006;18:59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  15. Logan J, Graham ID. Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Science Communication 1998;20:227-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547098020002004
  16. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-38
  17. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 1983.
  18. Forsner T, Hansson J, Brommels M, Wistedt AA, Forsell Y. Implementing clinical guidelines in psychiatry: a qualitative study of perceived facilitators and barriers. BMC Psychiatry 2010;10:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-8
  19. Whittaker AA, Aufdenkamp M, Tinley S. Barriers and facilitators to electronic documentation in a rural hospital. J Nurs Scholarsh 2009;41:293-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01278.x

Cited by

  1. A survey to identify barriers of implementing an antibiotic checklist vol.35, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2569-5