Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perceived Working Conditions and Sickness Absence - A Four-year Follow-up in the Food Industry

  • Siukola, Anna E. (School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere) ;
  • Virtanen, Pekka J. (School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere) ;
  • Luukkaala, Tiina H. (Pirkanmaa Hospital District and School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere) ;
  • Nygard, Clas-Hakan (School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere)
  • Received : 2011.05.23
  • Accepted : 2011.10.16
  • Published : 2011.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the association between changes in perceived physical and psychosocial working conditions and change of sickness absence days in younger and older (< 50 and ${\geq}50$ years) food industry employees. Methods: This was a follow up study of 679 employees, who completed working conditions survey questionnaires in 2005 and 2009 and for whom the requisite sickness absence data were available for the years 2004 and 2008. Results: Sickness absence increased and working conditions improved during follow-up. However, the change of increased sickness absence days were associated with the change of increased poor working postures and the change of deteriorated team spirit and reactivity (especially among < 50 years). No other changes in working conditions were associated with the changes in sickness absence. Conclusion: Sickness absence is affected by many factors other than working conditions. Nevertheless, according to this study improving team spirit and reactivity and preventing poor working postures are important in decreasing sickness absence.

Keywords

References

  1. Voss M, Floderus B, Diderichsen F. Physical, psychosocial, and organisational factors relative to sickness absence: a study based on Sweden Post. Occup Environ Med 2001;58:178-84. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.3.178
  2. Lund T, Labriola M, Christensen KB, Bultmann U, Villadsen E. Physical work environment risk factors for long term sickness absence: prospective findings among a cohort of 5357 employees in Denmark. BMJ 2006;332:449-52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38731.622975.3A
  3. Boedeker W. Associations between workload and diseases rarely occurring in sickness absence data. J Occup Environ Med 2001;43:1081-8.
  4. Duijts SF, Kant I, Swaen GM, van den Brandt PA, Zeegers MP. A meta-analysis of observational studies identifies predictors of sickness absence. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:1105-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.008
  5. Duijts SF, Kant IJ, Landeweerd JA, Swaen GM. Prediction of sickness absence: development of a screening instrument. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:564-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2005.024521
  6. Nielsen ML, Rugulies R, Christensen KB, Smith-Hansen L, Kristensen TS. Psychosocial work environment predictors of short and long spells of registered sickness absence during a 2-year follow up. J Occup Environ Med 2006;48:591-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000201567.70084.3a
  7. Christensen KB, Nielsen ML, Rugulies R, Smith-Hansen L, Kristensen TS. Workplace levels of psychosocial factors as prospective predictors of registered sickness absence. J Occup Environ Med 2005;47:933-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000172864.16001.85
  8. Hultin H, Hallqvist J, Alexanderson K, Johansson G, Lindholm C, Lundberg I, Moller J. Low level of adjustment latitude-a risk factor for sickness absence. Eur J Public Health 2010;20:682-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckp240
  9. North FM, Syme SL, Feeney A, Shipley M, Marmot M. Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Am J Public Health 1996;86:332-40. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.86.3.332
  10. Ishizaki M, Kawakami N, Honda R, Nakagawa H, Morikawa Y, Yamada Y; Japan Work Stress and Health Cohort Study Group. Psychosocial work characteristics and sickness absence in Japanese employees. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006;79:640-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-006-0095-6
  11. Otsuka Y, Takahashi M, Nakata A, Haratani T, Kaida K, Fukasawa K, Hanada T, Ito A. Sickness absence in relation to psychosocial work factors among daytime workers in an electric equipment manufacturing company. Ind Health 2007;45:224-31. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.45.224
  12. Vaananen A, Toppinen-Tanner S, Kalimo R, Mutanen P, Vahtera J, Peiro JM. Job characteristics, physical and psychological symptoms, and social support as antecedents of sickness absence among men and women in the private industrial sector. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:807-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00450-1
  13. Hanebuth D, Meinel M, Fischer JE. Health-related quality of life, psychosocial work conditions, and absenteeism in an industrial sample of blue- and white-collar employees: a comparison of potential predictors. J Occup Environ Med 2006;48:28-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000195319.24750.f8
  14. Melchior M, Niedhammer I, Berkman LF, Goldberg M. Do psychosocial work factors and social relations exert independent effects on sickness absence? A six year prospective study of the GAZEL cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:285-93. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.4.285
  15. Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Pentti J, Theorell T. Effect of change in the psychosocial work environment on sickness absence: a seven year follow up of initially healthy employees. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:484-93. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.7.484
  16. Head J, Kivimäki M, Martikainen P, Vahtera J, Ferrie JE, Marmot MG. Influence of change in psychosocial work characteristics on sickness absence: The Whitehall II Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:55-61. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.038752
  17. Messing K, Tissot F, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Kaminski M, Bourgine M. Sex as a variable can be a surrogate for some working conditions: factors associated with sickness absence. J Occup Environ Med 1998;40:250-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-199803000-00007
  18. Savinainen M, Nygard C, Arola H. Physical capacity and work ability among middle-aged women in physically demanding work - a 10-year follow-up study. Advances in Physiotherapy 2004;6:110-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14038190310017309
  19. Nygard CH, Huuhtanen P, Tuomi K, Martikainen R. Perceived work changes between 1981 and 1992 among aging workers in Finland. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997;23(Suppl 1):12-9.
  20. Tuomi K, Eskelinen L, Toikkanen J, Jarvinen E, Ilmarinen J, Klockars M. Work load and individual factors affecting work ability among aging municipal employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991;17(Suppl 1):128-34.
  21. Gamperiene M, Nygard JF, Sandanger I, Lau B, Bruusgaard D. Self-reported work ability of Norwegian women in relation to physical and mental health, and to the work environment. J Occup Med Toxicol 2008;3:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-8
  22. Blank N, Diderichsen F. Short-term and long-term sick-leave in Sweden: relationships with social circumstances, working conditions and gender. Scand J Soc Med 1995;23:265-72.
  23. Knutsson A, Goine H. Occupation and unemployment rates as predictors of long term sickness absence in two Swedish counties. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)10139-3
  24. Thomson L, Griffiths A, Davison S. Employee absence, age and tenure: a study of nonlinear effects and trivariate models. Work & Stress 2000;14:16-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/026783700417203
  25. Isacsson A, Hanson BS, Janzon L, Kugelberg G. The epidemiology of sick leave in an urban population in Malmo, Sweden. Scand J Soc Med 1992;20:234-9.
  26. Virtanen P, Siukola A, Luukkaala T, Savinainen M, Arola H, Nygard CH, Kivimaki M, Helenius H, Vahtera J. Sick leaves in four factories--do characteristics of employees and work conditions explain differences in sickness absence between workplaces? Scand J Work Environ Health 2008;34:260-6. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1225
  27. Ruohotie P. Ammatillinen kasvu tyoelamassa [Professional growth at work]. Ammattikasvatussarja 8. Hameenlinna (Finland): Tampereen yliopiston Hameenlinnan opettajankoulutuslaitos; 1993. 414 p. Finnish.
  28. Lehto A, Sutela H. Three decades of working conditions - Findings of Finnish Quality of Work Life Surveys 1977-2008 [Internet]. Helsinki (Finland). Statistics Finland; 2009 [Cited 2011 May 17]. 205 p. Available from: http://www.stat.fi/til/ tyoolot/tup_en.html
  29. Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Klockars M. Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997;23(Suppl 1):49-57.
  30. Karlsson N, Skargren E, Kristenson M. Emotional support predicts more sickness absence and poorer self assessed work ability: a two-year prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 2010;10:648.
  31. Virtanen P, Vahtera J, Nygard CH. Locality differences of sickness absence in the context of health and social conditions of the inhabitants. Scand J Public Health 2010;38:309-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809364561
  32. Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A, Liira J, Vainio H. Leadership, job well-being, and health effects-a systematic review and a metaanalysis. J Occup Environ Med 2008;50:904-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817e918d
  33. Laaksonen M, Pitkäniemi J, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E. Work arrangements, physical working conditions, and psychosocial working conditions as risk factors for sickness absence: Bayesian analysis of prospective data. Ann Epidemiol 2010;20:332- 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.02.004
  34. Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A. Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 5. Risk factors for sick leave - general studies. Scand J Public Health 2004;63(Suppl):49-108.
  35. Bockerman P, Ilmakunnas P. Interaction of working conditions, job satisfaction, and sickness absences: evidence from a representative sample of employees. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67:520-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.04.008

Cited by

  1. Does the association between musculoskeletal pain and sickness absence due to musculoskeletal diagnoses depend on biomechanical working conditions? vol.88, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0957-2
  2. Changes in psychosocial and physical working conditions and common mental disorders vol.26, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw019