DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dual Pulsed-Wave Doppler Tracing of Right Ventricular Inflow and Outflow: Single Cardiac Cycle Right Ventricular Tei Index and Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function

  • Choi, Jin-Oh (Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Joon-Hyouk (Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Jong (Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Noh, Hye-Jin (Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Huh, June (Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, I-Seok (Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Heung-Jae (Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Chol (Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Duk-Kyung (Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Seung-Woo (Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2009.12.28
  • Accepted : 2010.03.10
  • Published : 2010.08.30

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The reliability and usefulness of the right ventricular (RV) Tei index (RTX) remains controversial because it has not been possible to simultaneously measure RV inflow and outflow. However, dual pulsed-wave Doppler (DPD) enables flow velocities to be obtained at different sampling sites simultaneously. In this study we evaluated the feasibility and reliability of RTX values obtained by DPD (RTX$_{DPD}$). Subjects and Methods: Forty-one patients who underwent cardiac catheterization and echocardiography for RV volume or pressure overloading conditions were evaluated. Symptomlimited exercise treadmill testing with expired gas analysis was performed and maximal exercise capacity was measured. Results: RTX by conventional flow Doppler (RTX$_{CFD}$, 0.262${\pm}$0.164) was similar to RTX$_{DPD}$ (0.253${\pm}$0.117, p=NS), whereas RTX by tissue Doppler echocardiography (RTX$_{TDE}$, 0.447${\pm}$0.125) was significantly larger than RTX$_{DPD}$ (p<0.001). Based on multiple regression analysis, maximal exercise capacity was independently related to RTX$_{DPD}$ (${\beta}$=-0.60, p<0.001), mid-RV dimension (${\beta}$=-0.26, p=0.012), left ventricular ejection fraction (${\beta}$=0.22, p=0.023), and early diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (${\beta}$=0.21, p=0.048). Conclusion: It is feasible and reliable to evaluate RV function using RTX$_{DPD}$ values. However, to evaluate the clinical usefulness of RTX$_{DPD}$, additional studies are required with a large number of patients and long-term follow-up.

Keywords

References

  1. Tei C, Ling LH, Hodge DO, et al. New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: a simple and reproducible measure of cardiac function--a study in normals and dilated cardiomyopathy. J Cardiol 1995;26:357-66.
  2. Dujardin KS, Tei C, Yeo TC, Hodge DO, Rossi A, Seward JB. Prognostic value of a Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic performance in idiopathic-dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:1071-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00559-1
  3. Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, Kyle RA, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: clinical value in cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:658-64.
  4. Sohn IS, Kang HS, Kim SJ, et al. Tissue Doppler image-derived myocardial performance (Tei index) as a simple assessment of global cardiac function in adults. Korean Circ J 2005;35:315-21.
  5. Cho K, Park J, Lee C, et al. Isolated and combined influences of diabetes and hypertension on the myocardial function and geometry. Korean Circ J 2006;36:411-7.
  6. Voon WC, Su HM, Yen HW, Lin TH, Lai WT, Sheu SH. Left ventricular Tei index: comparison between flow and tissue Doppler analyses. Echocardiography 2005;22:730-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.00126.x
  7. Harada K, Tamura M, Toyono M, Yasuoka K. Comparison of the right ventricular Tei index by tissue Doppler imaging to that obtained by pulsed Doppler in children without heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:566-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02541-9
  8. Grignola JC, Gines F, Guzzo D. Comparison of the Tei index with invasive measurements of right ventricular function. Int J Cardiol 2006;113:25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.10.012
  9. Roberson DA, Cui W. Right ventricular Tei index in children: effect of method, age, body surface area, and heart rate. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:764-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2006.11.002
  10. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358-67.
  11. Pritchett AM, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Rodeheffer RJ, Bailey KR, Redfield MM. Left atrial volume as an index of left atrial size: a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1036-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02981-9
  12. Gilman G, Nelson TA, Hansen WH, Khandheria BK, Ommen SR. Diastolic function: a sonographer's approach to the essential echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular diastolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:199-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2006.08.005

Cited by

  1. Repeatability and reproducibility of right ventricular Tei index valves derived from three echocardiographic methods for evaluation of cardiac function in dogs vol.77, pp.7, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.77.7.715
  2. Study on Evaluating the Value of Tei Index in the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adult Health Examination by Double Pulse Doppler Technique vol.7, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2017.73026