A Study on the Setting Criteria and Management Area for the National Ecological Network

광역생태축 구축을 위한 기준 및 관리지역 설정 연구

  • 전성우 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 국가기후변화적응센터) ;
  • 천정윤 (경기개발연구원 환경정책연구부) ;
  • 성현찬 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과) ;
  • 송원경 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 국가기후변화적응센터) ;
  • 박지희 ((구)한국환경정책.평가연구원)
  • Received : 2010.09.25
  • Accepted : 2010.10.22
  • Published : 2010.10.30

Abstract

This study was performed to show criteria of a National Ecological Network (NEN) for South Korea and it was a part of a study of ecological network for broad areas on national land showed by Ministry of Environment of Korea. After 1970s, many european countries presented methods and criteria not on individual protected area but on networking among many habitats. The PEEN (Pan European Ecological Network) and NATURA 2000 are results of those. In South Korea, concepts and mapping metheods of ecological network was studied but those were not applied to the whole national land because the equality and local specialities were not reflected. So, in this study, we presented the criteria composed of forest, river, wildlife and coastal evaluation items in conservation ecology and showed the mapping method which can applied to the national land. After the evaluation on land area which composed of forest, river and wildlife axis. Core areas were $30,616km^2$, buffer zone were $21,870km^2$ and each accounted for 31% and 22% of the national land. Except for Taebaeck-Gangwon region, whole region's core areas were accounted for 20~30% of it and buffer zone were accounted for 20~25% of it, so these can be applied to the national land with equality and local specialities. Forest axis and river axis were clearly linear and connected, but the wildlife axis was dispersed in point form. Therefore, to apply the NEN, a detailed habitat map is important and the interconnected implementation of forest, river, wildlife, and coastal axis is required.

Keywords

References

  1. 김귀곤․조동길. 1998. 도시생태네트워크 구축에 관한 기초연구. 한국환경복원녹화학회지1(1) : 70-83.
  2. 김선희. 1999. 국토생태통합네트워크 구축과 관리방안 연구. 국토연구원 보고서.
  3. 박창석․노백호․정재현 외 13명. 2008. 국토연안생태 네트워크 구축과 계획적 관리방안(I). 한국환경정책․평가연구원 보고서.
  4. 성현찬․옥진아. 2005. 경기도 녹지보전제도 개선방안. 경기개발연구원 보고서.
  5. 오동하. 2006. 부산시 생태네트워크 구축 방안 연구. 부산발전연구원 보고서.
  6. 이승은․홍선기. 2002. 도시 생태네트워크 계획. 시그마프레스.
  7. 이동근․송원경. 2008. 삵의 서식지 적합성 평가를 위한 분석단위 설정 및 보전지역 선정 -충청도 지역을 중심으로-. 한국조경학회지 36 (5) : 64-72.
  8. 이명진․전성우․이종수․강병진․송원경. 2007. 대축척 국토환경성평가지도 작성방안연구. 환경정책연구 6(3) : 115-145.
  9. 충청남도. 2008. 충청남도 광역생태네트워크 구축을 위한 자연환경조사 연구.
  10. 환경부. 2002. 국토생태네트워크의 추진전략에 관한 연구.
  11. 환경부. 2005. 국가환경종합계획.
  12. 환경부. 2006. 자연환경보전기본계획.
  13. 환경부. 2008. 백두대간․정맥의 사전환경성평가 방법 및 가이드라인 마련 연구.
  14. Bennett, G. 1998. Guidelines for Establishing the Pan-European Ecological Network. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
  15. Bennett, G., and P. Wit. 2001. The Development and Application of Ecological Networks. A Review of Proposals, Plans and Programmes. AID Environment. Amsterdam. 131pp.
  16. Chape, S., S. Blyth, L. Fish, P. Fox and M. Spalding (compilers). 2003. 2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and UNEPWCMC. Cambridge. UK.
  17. Edward, A. Cook and Hubert N. van Lier. 1994. Landscape planning and ecological network. pp.1-3.
  18. Bennett, G., and K. J. Mulongoy. 2006. Riview of experience with ecological networks, corridors and buffer zones. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Montreal. Technical Series No.23. 100pp.
  19. Higgs, A. H., and M. B. Usher. 1980. Should nature reserves be large or small?. Nature, 285 : 568-569. https://doi.org/10.1038/285568a0
  20. Lammers, W. 1994. "A new strategy in nature policy : towards a national ecological network in the Netherlands" In : Cook, E. A., H. N. Lier, eds. Landscape planning and ecological networks. Elsevier Science. Amsterdam. pp. 283-307.
  21. MacArthur R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
  22. Klijn, J. A., A. J. F. M., wan Opstal and I. M. Bouwma. 2003. Indicative map of the Pan- European Ecological Network for central and eastern europe. European Centre for Nature Conservation. Tilburg. The Netherlands.
  23. Nowicki, P., G. Bennett, D. Middleton, S. Rientjes and R. Wolters. 1996. Perspectives on Ecological Networks. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg. The Netherlands.
  24. Plotnick, R. E., and R. H. Gardner. 1993. Lattices and landscape. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences, 23 : 129-158.
  25. Gardner, R. H., and R. V. O'Neill. 2001. Landscape Ecology in the Oryandpractice:Pattern and Process. Springer. New York.
  26. Jongman, R. H. G., M. Külvik and I. Kristiansen. 2004. European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68 : 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00163-4