Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

New accuracy indicator to quantify the true and false modes for eigensystem realization algorithm

  • Wang, Shuqing (College of Engineering, Ocean University of China) ;
  • Liu, Fushun (College of Engineering, Ocean University of China)
  • Received : 2008.12.17
  • Accepted : 2009.12.18
  • Published : 2010.03.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to apply a new proposed accuracy indicator to quantify the true and false modes for Eigensystem Realization Algorithm using output-based responses. First, a discrete mass-spring system and a simply supported continuous beam were modelled using finite element method. Then responses are simulated under random excitation. Natural Excitation Technique using only response measurements is applied to compute the impulse responses. Eigensystem Realization Algorithm is employed to identify the modal parameters on the simulated responses. A new accuracy indicator, Normalized Occurrence Number-NON, is developed to quantitatively partition the realized modes into true and false modes so that the false portions can be disregarded. Numerical simulation demonstrates that the new accuracy indicator can determine the true system modes accurately.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersen, P. (1997), Identification of Civil Engineering Structures Using Vector ARMA Models, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark.
  2. Bodeux, J.B. and Golinval, J.C. (2003), "Modal identification and damage detection using datadriven stochastic subspace and ARMA methods", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 17(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2002.1543
  3. Desforges, M.J., Cooper, J.E. and Wright, J.R. (1995), "Spectral and modal parameter estimation from outputonly measurements", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 9(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1995.0014
  4. Gibson, J.D. and Melsa, J.L. (1975), Introduction to Nonparametric Detection with Applications. Academic Press, New York.
  5. Ibrahim, S.R. and Mickulcik, E. (1977), "A method for the direct identification of vibration parameters from the free responses", Shock Vib., 47(4), 183-198.
  6. James, G.H., Carne, T.G. and Lauffer, J.P. (1993), The Natural Excitation Technique for Modal Parameter Extraction from Operating Wind Turbines. SAND92-1666, UC-261, Sandia National Laboratories.
  7. Juang, J.N. and Pappa, R.S. (1985), "An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction", J. Guid. Control Dynam., 8(5), 620-627. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20031
  8. Klema, V.C. and Laub, A.J. (1980), "The singular value decomposition: Its computation and some applications", IEEE T. Automat. Contr., AC-25, 164-176.
  9. Mohanty, P. and Rixen, D.J. (2006), "Modified ERA method for operational modal analysis in the presence of harmonic excitations", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 20, 114-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.06.010
  10. Pandit, S.M. and Wu, S.M. (1983), Time Series and System Analysis with Applications, Wiley, New York.
  11. Pappa, R.S., Elliott, K.B. and Schenk, A. (1993), "Consistent-mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm", J. Guid. Control Dynam., 16(5), 852-858. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21092
  12. Van Oerschee, P. and De Moor, B. (1996), "Subspace identification for linear systems: theory, implementation and applications", Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  13. Wang, S. and Li, H. (2005), "Modal identification of offshore platforms using statistical method based on ERA", China Ocean Eng., 19(2), 175-184.
  14. Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Xu, X. and Hua, H. (2005), "Modal parameter identification using response data only", J. Sound Vib., 282, 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.02.012

Cited by

  1. Numerical and experimental investigation of modal-energy-based damage localization for offshore wind turbine structures 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217750725
  2. Modal strain energy based structural damage localization for offshore platform using simulated and measured data vol.13, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-014-2028-4
  3. An improved modal strain energy method for damage detection in offshore platform structures vol.15, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-016-1350-1
  4. Damage localization of marine risers using time series of vibration signals vol.13, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-014-2257-6
  5. Assessment of structural damage using natural frequency changes vol.28, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-012-0017-7
  6. Structural model updating of an offshore platform using the cross model cross mode method: An experimental study vol.97, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.007
  7. Modal Strain Energy-based Structural Damage Identification: A Review and Comparative Study pp.1683-0350, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2018.1507607
  8. A novel Tikhonov regularization-based iterative method for structural damage identification of offshore platforms pp.1437-8213, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0579-6
  9. Application of joint time-frequency distribution for estimation of time-varying modal damping ratio vol.37, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.37.2.131
  10. An iterative total least squares‐based estimation method for structural damage identification of 3D frame structures vol.27, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2499
  11. A novel multistage approach for structural model updating based on sensitivity ranking vol.25, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.25.6.657
  12. Structural damage identification using an iterative two-stage method combining a modal energy based index with the BAS algorithm vol.36, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.1.031
  13. Localizing and quantifying structural damage by means of a beetle swarm optimization algorithm vol.24, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220956829