Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제11권6호
  • /
  • Pages.632-639
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Value of Power Doppler and Gray-Scale US in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Contribution of Cross-Sectional Area just before the Tunnel Inlet as Compared with the Cross-Sectional Area at the Tunnel

  • Akcar, Nevbahar (Department of Radiology, Osmangazi University Hospital, RWTH Aachen) ;
  • Ozkan, Serhat (Department of Neurology, Osmangazi University Hospital) ;
  • Mehmetoglu, Ozlem (Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Osmangazi University Hospital) ;
  • Calisir, Cuneyt (Department of Radiology, Osmangazi University Hospital) ;
  • Adapinar, Baki (Department of Radiology, Osmangazi University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2010.07.02
  • 심사 : 2010.07.15
  • 발행 : 2010.12.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: To determine the value of gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Materials and Methods: Median nerves at the carpal tunnel were evaluated by using gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasonography and by using accepted and new criteria in 42 patients with CTS (62 wrists) confirmed by electromyogram and 33 control subjects. We evaluated the cross-sectional area of the nerve just proximal to the tunnel inlet (CSAa), and at mid level (CSAb). We then calculated the percentage area increase of CSAb, and area difference (CSAb-CSAa). We measured two dimensions of the nerve at the distal level to calculate the flattening ratio. The power Doppler ultrasonography was used to assess the number of vessels, which proceeded to give a score according to the vessel number, and lastly evaluated the statistical significance by comparing the means of patients with control subjects by the Student t test for independent samples. Sensitivities and specificities were determined for sonographic characteristics mentioned above. We obtained the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the optimal cut-off values for the diagnosis of CTS. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between patients and the control group for mean CSAb, area difference, percentage area increase, and flattening ratio (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.05, respectively). From the ROC curve we obtained optimal cut-off values of 11 $mm^2$ for CSAb, 3.65 for area difference, 50% for the percentage of area increase, and 2.6 for the flattening ratio. The mean number of vessels obtained by power Doppler ultrasonography from the median nerve was 1.2. We could not detect vessels from healthy volunteers. Mean CSAbs related to vascularity intensity scores were as follows: score 0: $12.3{\pm}2.8\;mm^2$, score 1: $12.3{\pm}3.1\;mm^2$, score 2: $14.95{\pm}3.5\;mm^2$, score 3: $19.3{\pm}3.8\;mm^2$. The mean PI value in vessels of the median nerve was $4.1{\pm}1$. Conclusion: Gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasonography are useful in the evaluation of CTS.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Duncan I, Sullivan P, Lomas F. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:681- 684 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470903
  2. Sarna L, Cabada T, Cozcolluela R, Martinez-Berganza T, Garcia S. Carpal tunnel syndrome: usefulness of sonography. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1920-1925 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300000502
  3. Chen P, Maklad N, Redwine M, Zelitt D. Dynamic high-resolution sonography of the carpal tunnel. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:533-537 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016242
  4. Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, De Zordo T, Feuchtner GM, Arora R, Gruber J, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with US: value of additional cross-sectional area measurements of the median nerve in patients versus healthy volunteers. Radiology 2009;250:171-177 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2501080397
  5. Buchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Lener M, Schmidauer C. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:793-798 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.159.4.1529845
  6. Ziswiler HR, Reichenbach S, Vogelin E, Bachmann LM, Villiger PM, Juni P. Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:304-311 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20723
  7. Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Lo SK, Fu M, Wong KS. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. Radiology 2004;232:93-99 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2321030071
  8. Keberle M, Jenett M, Kenn W, Reiners K, Peter M, Haerten R, et al. Technical advances in ultrasound and MR imaging of carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1043-1050 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300000386
  9. El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:887-895 https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh190
  10. Visser LH, Smidt MH, Lee ML. High-resolution sonography versus EMG in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:63-67 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.115337
  11. Keles I, Karagulle Kendi AT, Aydin G, Zog SG, Orkun S. Diagnostic precision of ultrasonography in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:443-450 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000163715.11645.96
  12. Leonard L, Rangan A, Doyle G, Taylor G. Carpal tunnel syndrome - is high-frequency ultrasound a useful diagnostic tool? J Hand Surg Br 2003;28:77-79
  13. Ashraf AR, Jali R, Moghtaderi AR, Yazdani AH. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography in patients with electrophysiologicaly confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2009;49:3-8
  14. Mallouhi A, Pu ¨ltzl P, Trieb T, Piza H, Bodner G. Predictors of carpal tunnel syndrome: accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1240- 1245 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1715
  15. Radack DM, Schweitzer ME, Taras J. Carpal tunnel syndrome: are the MR findings a result of population selection bias? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1649-1653 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.6.9393185
  16. Klauser A, Frauscher F, Schirmer M, Halpern E, Pallwein L, Herold M, et al. The value of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound in the detection of vascularization of finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:647-653 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10136
  17. Shio K, Homma F, Kanno Y, Yamadera Y, Ohguchi Y, Nishimaki T, et al. Doppler sonographic comparative study on usefulness of synovial vascularity between knee and metacarpophalangeal joints for evaluation of articular inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by infliximab. Mod Rheumatol 2006;16:220-225 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10165-006-0488-0
  18. Cho KH, Lee SM, Lee YH, Suh KJ. Ultrasound diagnosis of either an occult or missed fracture of an extremity in pediatricaged children. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:84-94 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.1.84
  19. Lee D, van Holsbeeck MT, Janevski PK, Ganos DL, Ditmars DM, Darian VB. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ultrasound versus electromyography. Radiol Clin North Am 1999;37:859-872 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70132-9
  20. Sucher BM. Ultrasound imaging of the carpal tunnel during median nerve compression. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2009;2:134-146 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-009-9056-5
  21. Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Passmore LV, Walker FO. Ultrasonographic reference values for assessing the normal median nerve in adults. J Neuroimaging 2009;19:47-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2008.00256.x
  22. Elwakil TF, Elazzazi A, Shokeir H. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by low-level laser versus open carpal tunnel release. Lasers Med Sci 2007;22:265-270 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0448-8
  23. Kook SH, Park HW, Lee YR, Lee YU, Pae WK, Park YL. Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1999;27:231-237 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199906)27:5<231::AID-JCU2>3.0.CO;2-P
  24. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, Jeffrey SS, Jeffrey RB Jr. Preliminary experience with power Doppler imaging of solid breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:703-707 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275882
  25. Lee SH, Suh JS, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Kim N, Suh SH. Quantitative assessment of synovial vascularity using contrastenhanced power Doppler ultrasonography: correlation with histologic findings and MR imaging findings in arthritic rabbit knee model. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:45-53 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.1.45

피인용 문헌

  1. Relationship Between Intraneural Vascular Flow Measured With Sonography and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis Based on Electrodiagnostic Testing vol.31, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.5.729
  2. Morphologic Characterization of Intraneural Flow Associated With Median Nerve Pathology vol.28, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/8756479311426777
  3. Use of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography to Investigate Intraneural Vascularity in a Cohort of Macaca fascicularis With Suspected Median Mononeuropathy vol.33, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.1.103
  4. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a new paradigm vol.54, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu275
  5. Detection of Intraneural Median Nerve Microvascularity Using Contrast-Enhanced Sonography : A Pilot Study vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.07012
  6. Diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome with Doppler ultrasonography: a comparison of ultrasonographic measurements and electrophysiological severity vol.39, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2016.1275455
  7. Accuracy of Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.99, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.489
  8. Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in the evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review vol.125, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01141-x
  9. Value of Grayscale and Power Doppler High‐Resolution Ultrasound in Assessment of Patients with Clinically Suspected Carpal Tunnel Syndrome vol.39, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15200
  10. Accuracy of high‐resolution ultrasonography in establishing the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome vol.90, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15704
  11. Recent Advances in Ultrasound Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome vol.10, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10080596
  12. Ultrasound parameters to identify and diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. A review of the literature vol.23, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12219
  13. Review Article “Spotlight on Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Nerve Disease: The Evidence to Date” vol.14, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s295851
  14. The Morphological and Dynamic Changes of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Effects of Oral Steroids Treatment for Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome vol.11, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081336
  15. Quantitative assessment of intraneural vascular alterations in peripheral nerve trauma using high-resolution neurosonography: technical note vol.11, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92643-9