DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Differential Imaging Features of Fat-Containing Tumors in the Peritoneal Cavity and Retroperitoneum: the Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

  • Shin, Na-Young (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Myeong-Jin (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Jae-Joon (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Yong-Eun (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Young (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Young-Nyun (Department of Pathology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2009.08.18
  • Accepted : 2010.02.01
  • Published : 2010.06.01

Abstract

There are a variety of fat-containing lesions that can arise in the intraperitoneal cavity and retroperitoneal space. Some of these fat-containing lesions, such as liposarcoma and retroperitoneal teratoma, have to be resected, although resection can be deferred for others, such as adrenal adenoma, myelolipoma, angiomyolipoma, ovarian teratoma, and lipoma, until the lesions become large or symptomatic. The third group tumors (i.e., mesenteric panniculitis and pseudolipoma of Glisson's capsule) require medical treatment or no treatment at all. Identifying factors such as whether the fat is macroscopic or microscopic within the lesion, the origin of the lesions, and the presence of combined calcification is important for narrowing the differential diagnosis. The development and widespread use of modern imaging modalities make identification of these factors easier so narrowing the differential diagnosis is possible. At the same time, lesions that do not require immediate treatment are being incidentally found at an increasing rate with these same imaging techniques. Thus, the questions about the treatment methods have become increasingly important. Classifying lesions in terms of the necessity of performing surgical treatment can provide important information to clinicians, and this is the one of a radiologist's key responsibilities.

Keywords

References

  1. Prasad SR, Wang H, Rosas H, Menias CO, Narra VR, Middleton WD, et al. Fat-containing lesions of the liver: radiologicpathologic correlation. Radiographics 2005;25:321-331 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.252045083
  2. Pereira JM, Sirlin CB, Pinto PS, Casola G. CT and MR imaging of extrahepatic fatty masses of the abdomen and pelvis: techniques, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2005;25:69-85 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.251045074
  3. Israel GM, Bosniak MA, Slywotzky CM, Rosen RJ. CT differentiation of large exophytic renal angiomyolipomas and perirenal liposarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:769-773 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.3.1790769
  4. Singer S, Antonescu CR, Riedel E, Brennan MF. Histologic subtype and margin of resection predict pattern of recurrence and survival for retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Ann Surg 2003;238:358-370
  5. Weiss SW. Lipomatous tumors. In: Weiss SW, Brooks JSJ, eds. Soft tissue tumors. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996:207- 251
  6. Kim T, Murakami T, Oi H, Tsuda K, Matsushita M, Tomoda K, et al. CT and MR imaging of abdominal liposarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:829-833 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610559
  7. Kawano R, Nishie A, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Tajima T, Hirakawa M, et al. Retroperitoneal well-differentiated inflammatory liposarcoma: a diagnostic dilemma. Radiat Med 2008;26:450- 453 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-008-0255-6
  8. Dei Tos AP. Liposarcoma: new entities and evolving concepts. Ann Diagn Pathol 2000;4:252-266 https://doi.org/10.1053/adpa.2000.8133
  9. Song T, Shen J, Liang BL, Mai WW, Li Y, Guo HC. Retroperitoneal liposarcoma: MR characteristics and pathological correlative analysis. Abdom Imaging 2007;32:668-674 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9220-6
  10. Tateishi U, Hasegawa T, Beppu Y, Satake M, Moriyama N. Primary dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum. Prognostic significance of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:799-804 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200309000-00019
  11. Gatcombe HG, Assikis V, Kooby D, Johnstone PA. Primary retroperitoneal teratomas: a review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 2004;86:107-113 https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20043
  12. Taori K, Rathod J, Deshmukh A, Sheorain VS, Jawale R, Sanyal R, et al. Primary extragonadal retroperitoneal teratoma in an adult. Br J Radiol 2006;79:E120-E122 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/33507627
  13. Davidson AJ, Hartman DS, Goldman SM. Mature teratoma of the retroperitoneum: radiologic, pathologic, and clinical correlation. Radiology 1989;172:421-425 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.172.2.2664866
  14. Kurosaki Y, Tanaka YO, Itai Y. Well-differentiated liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum with a fat-fluid level: US, CT, and MR appearance. Eur Radiol 1998;8:474-475 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050418
  15. Commons RR, Callaway CP. Adenomas of the adrenal cortex. Arch Med Interna 1948;81:37-41 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1948.00220190045004
  16. Korobkin M, Giordano TJ, Brodeur FJ, Francis IR, Siegelman ES, Quint LE, et al. Adrenal adenomas: relationship between histologic lipid and CT and MR findings. Radiology 1996;200:743-747 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756925
  17. L'Hostis H, Deminiere C, Ferriere JM, Coindre JM. Renal angiomyolipoma: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and follow-up study of 46 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:1011-1020 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199909000-00003
  18. Hajdu SI, Foote FW Jr. Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: report of 27 cases and review of the literature. J Urol 1969;102:396- 401 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)62157-8
  19. Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G. The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1868-1872 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841868
  20. Wagner BJ, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Davis CJ Jr. Adult renal hamartomas. Radiographics 1997;17:155-169 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.17.1.9017806
  21. Schuster TG, Ferguson MR, Baker DE, Schaldenbrand JD, Solomon MH. Papillary renal cell carcinoma containing fat without calcification mimicking angiomyolipoma on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1402-1404 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831402
  22. Kim JK, Park SY, Shon JH, Cho KS. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT. Radiology 2004;230:677-684 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303030003
  23. Plaut A. Myelolipoma in the adrenal cortex; myeloadipose structures. Am J Pathol 1958;34:487-515
  24. Kenney PJ, Wagner BJ, Rao P, Heffess CS. Myelolipoma: CT and pathologic features. Radiology 1998;208:87-95 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646797
  25. Musante F, Derchi LE, Zappasodi F, Bazzocchi M, Riviezzo GC, Banderali A, et al. Myelolipoma of the adrenal gland: sonographic and CT features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:961-964 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.151.5.961
  26. Meyer A, Behrend M. Presentation and therapy of myelolipoma. Int J Urol 2005;12:239-243 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01034.x
  27. Kumar M, Duerinckx AJ. Bilateral extraadrenal perirenal myelolipomas: an imaging challenge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:833-836 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.3.1830833
  28. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL. Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics 2001;21:475-490 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.2.g01mr09475
  29. Marina NM, Cushing B, Giller R, Cohen L, Lauer SJ, Ablin A, et al. Complete surgical excision is effective treatment for children with immature teratomas with or without malignant elements: A Pediatric Oncology Group/Children's Cancer Group Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:2137-2143 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.2137
  30. Caspi B, Appelman Z, Rabinerson D, Zalel Y, Tulandi T, Shoham Z. The growth pattern of ovarian dermoid cysts: a prospective study in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 1997;68:501-505 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00228-8
  31. Ayhan A, Bukulmez O, Genc C, Karamursel BS, Ayhan A. Mature cystic teratomas of the ovary: case series from one institution over 34 years. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;88:153-157 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00141-4
  32. Daskalogiannaki M, Voloudaki A, Prassopoulos P, Magkanas E, Stefanaki K, Apostolaki E, et al. CT evaluation of mesenteric panniculitis: prevalence and associated diseases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:427-431 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740427
  33. Kikiros CS, Edis AJ. Mesenteric panniculitis resulting in bowel obstruction: response to steroids. Aust N Z J Surg 1989;59:287- 290 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1989.tb01565.x
  34. Popkharitov AI, Chomov GN. Mesenteric panniculitis of the sigmoid colon: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Reports 2007;1:108 https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-1-108
  35. Quinn AM, Guzman-Hartman G. Pseudolipoma of Glisson capsule. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:503-504

Cited by

  1. 仙骨前面骨髄脂肪腫の1例 vol.44, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5833/jjgs.44.1485
  2. Pelvic tumors with normal-appearing shapes of ovaries and uterus presenting as an emergency (Review) vol.4, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.692
  3. Atypical extragonadal germ cell tumors vol.17, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.91079
  4. Mesenteric tumors: Diagnosis and treatment vol.149, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.05.005
  5. Spermatic cord myxoid liposarcoma presenting as an incarcerated inguinal hernia: report of a case and review of literatures vol.16, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0803-3
  6. Current MR Imaging Lipid Detection Techniques for Diagnosis of Lesions in the Abdomen and Pelvis vol.33, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.333125068
  7. Retroperitoneal sarcomas: A review of disease spectrum, radiological features, characterisation and management vol.57, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12123
  8. Metabolic and anatomic characteristics of benign and malignant adrenal masses on positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a review of literature vol.49, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0440-6
  9. MR imaging of the retrorectal-presacral tumors: an algorithmic approach vol.40, pp.7, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0404-1
  10. Tuberous sclerosis complex: Imaging characteristics in 11 cases and review of the literature vol.36, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-016-1632-5
  11. Causes of hepatic capsular retraction: a pictorial essay vol.7, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0520-7
  12. Intra-abdominal fat. Part III. Neoplasms lesions of the adipose tissue vol.16, pp.65, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2016.0016
  13. Clinical significance of mesenteric panniculitis-like abnormalities on abdominal computerized tomography in patients with malignant neoplasms vol.22, pp.48, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10601
  14. Sclerosing liposarcoma of epididymis: Role of chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging vol.26, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.190425
  15. Hepatic myelolipoma in two Goeldi's monkeys from South America held captive vol.45, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jmp.12226
  16. Case report of a bilateral adrenal myelolipoma associated with Cushing disease vol.96, pp.52, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000009455
  17. Do Incidental Hyperechoic Renal Lesions Measuring Up to 1 cm Warrant Further Imaging? Outcomes of 161 Lesions vol.209, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.16.17490
  18. Presacral Myelolipoma with Early Gastric Cancer vol.50, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5833/jjgs.2016.0050
  19. Incidentally discovered well-differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma with inguinal canal herniation: report of 2 cases vol.12, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2017.03.017
  20. COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH MALIGNANT RENAL MASSES vol.6, pp.46, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2017/776
  21. Intra-abdominal bleeding with hemorrhagic shock: a case of adrenal myelolipoma and review of literature vol.17, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0270-6
  22. The Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging Features of Myxoid Liposarcoma Arising from the Mesentery: a Case Report vol.21, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2017.21.4.252
  23. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RENAL MASSES BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY vol.7, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2018/10
  24. Imaging of liposarcomas for clinicians: Characteristic features and differential considerations vol.117, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24949
  25. Myxoid Liposarcoma of Spermatic Cord Misdiagnosed for Hemangioma vol.16, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22465/kjuo.2018.16.2.86
  26. Well-Differentiated Papillary Mesothelioma with Omental Calcifications: A Case Report and Review of the Literature vol.21, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12659/ajcr.920487
  27. Macroscopic Appearance of Giant Adrenal Myelolipoma During Laparoscopy: An Adjunct in Differential Diagnosis vol.12, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6582
  28. Peritoneal loose bodies and the differentiation of fatty abdominal and pelvic lesions vol.15, pp.9, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2020.06.040
  29. A Case of Extra-Adrenal Myelolipoma Arising from the Right Lateral Pelvic Area vol.54, pp.12, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5833/jjgs.2020.0199
  30. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for a giant adrenal myelolipoma: A case report vol.90, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106678