DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Correlation with the Histologic Differentiation and the Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

  • Heo, Suk-Hee (Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Jeong, Yong-Yeon (Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Soo (Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Woong (Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Lim, Hyo-Soon (Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Hyuk (Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Koh, Yang-Seok (Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Cho, Chol-Kyoon (Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Kang, Heoung-Keun (Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School)
  • 투고 : 2009.12.07
  • 심사 : 2010.02.08
  • 발행 : 2010.06.01

초록

Objective: To evaluate whether the histopathological differentiation and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) do show correlation with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Materials and Methods: Twenty-seven HCCs from 27 patients who had undergone preoperative liver MRI (1.5T) and surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed. DWI was obtained with a single-shot, echo-planar imaging sequence in the axial plane (b values: 0 and 1,000 sec/$mm^2$). On DWIs, the ADC value of the HCCs was measured by one radiologist, who was kept 'blinded' to the histological findings. Histopathologically, the differentiation was classified into well (n = 9), moderate (n = 9) and poor (n = 9). The expression of VEGF was semiquantitatively graded as grade 0 (n = 8), grade 1 (n = 9) and grade 2 (n = 10). We analyzed whether the histopathological differentiation and the expression of VEGF of the HCC showed correlation with the ADC value on DWI. Results: The mean ADC value of the poorly-differentiated HCCs ($0.9{\pm}0.13{\times}10^{-3}\;mm^2/s$) was lower than those of the well-differentiated HCCs ($1.2{\pm}0.22{\times}10^{-3}\;mm^2/s$) (p = 0.031) and moderately-differentiated HCCs ($1.1{\pm}0.01{\times}10^{-3}\;mm^2/s$) (p = 0.013). There was a significant correlation between the differentiation and the ADC value of the HCCs (r = -0.51, p = 0.012). The mean ADC of the HCCs with a VEGF expression grade of 0, 1 and 2 was $1.1{\pm}0.17$, $1.1{\pm}0.21$ and $1.1{\pm}0.18{\times}10^{-3}\;mm^2/s$, respectively. The VEGF expression did not show correlation with the ADC value of the HCCs (r = 0.07, p = 0.74). Conclusion: The histopathological differentiation of HCC shows inverse correlation with the ADC value. Therefore, DWI with ADC measurement may be a valuable tool for noninvasively predicting the differentiation of HCC.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Korea Research Foundation

참고문헌

  1. Ince N, Wands JR. The increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999;340:798-799 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199903113401009
  2. Tung-Ping Poon R, Fan ST, Wong J. Risk factors, prevention, and management of postoperative recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 2000;232:10-24 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200007000-00003
  3. Haratake J, Takeda S, Kasai T, Nakano S, Tokui N. Predictable factors for estimating prognosis of patients after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1993;72:1178-1183 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19930815)72:4<1178::AID-CNCR2820720408>3.0.CO;2-Q
  4. Kim SH, Lee WJ, Lim HK, Park CK. SPIO-enhanced MRI findings of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas: correlation with MDCT findings. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:112- 120 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.112
  5. Yamaguchi R, Yano H, Iemura A, Ogasawara S, Haramaki M, Kojiro M. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1998;28:68-77
  6. Chedid A, Ryan LM, Dayal Y, Wolf BC, Falkson G. Morphology and other prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999;123:524-528
  7. Kadoya M, Matsui O, Takashima T, Nonomura A. Hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of MR imaging and histopathologic findings. Radiology 1992;183:819-825 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.183.3.1316622
  8. Ebara M, Fukuda H, Kojima Y, Morimoto N, Yoshikawa M, Sugiura N, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship of signal intensity to histopathologic findings and metal content of the tumor and surrounding hepatic parenchyma. Radiology 1999;210:81-88 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja4181
  9. Muramatsu Y, Nawano S, Takayasu K, Moriyama N, Yamada N, Yamasaki S, et al. Early hepatocellular carcinoma: MR imaging. Radiology 1991;181:209-213 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.181.1.1653443
  10. Kanematsu M, Osada S, Amaoka N, Goshima S, Kondo H, Kato H, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma and the surrounding liver and correlation with MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:832- 841 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840832
  11. Connolly DT. Vascular permeability factor: a unique regulator of blood vessel function. J Cell Biochem 1991;47:219-223 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240470306
  12. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Tsukamoto T, Nakajima H, Mori K, Minami M. Diffusion-weighted imaging of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging characteristics and relationship among signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient, and histopathologic grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:438-444 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1424
  13. Maeda M, Kato H, Sakuma H, Maier SE, Takeda K. Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient in line scan diffusionweighted imaging for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignant lymphomas of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1186-1192
  14. Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F, Kawakami S, Saito A, Matsushita T, et al. Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 2001;220:621-630 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2202010063
  15. Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T, Morikawa M, Uetani M, Kabasawa H, et al. Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1627-1634
  16. Xu H, Li X, Xie JX, Yang ZH, Wang B. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of focal hepatic nodules in an experimental hepatocellular carcinoma rat model. Acad Radiol 2007;14:279-286 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2006.12.005
  17. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. AJCC cancer staging handbook, 6th ed. New York: Springer, 2002
  18. Edmondson HA, Steiner PE. Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer 1954;7:462-503 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO;2-E
  19. Kwak BK, Shim HJ, Park ES, Kim SA, Choi D, Lim HK, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between vascular endothelial growth factor level and degree of enhancement by multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2001;36:487-492 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200108000-00008
  20. Guo AC, Cummings TJ, Dash RC, Provenzale JM. Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. Radiology 2002;224:177-183 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2241010637
  21. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1622-1635 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1403
  22. Roth Y, Tichler T, Kostenich G, Ruiz-Cabello J, Maier SE, Cohen JS, et al. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for pretreatment prediction and early monitoring of tumor response to therapy in mice. Radiology 2004;232:685-692 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2322030778
  23. Park YN, Kim YB, Yang KM, Park C. Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis in the early stage of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:1061-1065
  24. Sun HC, Tang ZY. Angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma: the retrospectives and perspectives. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004;130:307-319 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-003-0530-y

피인용 문헌

  1. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Is Superior to Positron Emission Tomography in the Detection and Nodal Assessment of Lung Cancers vol.91, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.037
  2. Relationship Between Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histological Tumor Grading of Hepatocellular Carcinoma vol.19, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2066-8
  3. Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers vol.22, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2403-8
  4. Prediction of the histopathological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma using qualitative diffusion-weighted, dynamic, and hepatobiliary phase MRI vol.22, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2421-6
  5. Dynamic characteristics of MR diffusion-weighted imaging in a rabbit liver VX-2 tumor model vol.31, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-012-0156-6
  6. Diffusion-weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma for predicting early recurrence and survival after hepatectomy vol.7, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-012-9383-2
  7. Grading of uterine cervical cancer by using the ADC difference value and its correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor vol.23, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2657-1
  8. MR imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma: correlations between MRI features and molecular marker VEGF vol.31, pp.12, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0313-0
  9. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Correlation with Enhancement Degree and Histologic Grade vol.270, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130444
  10. CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part II. Extracellular agents, hepatobiliary agents, and ancillary imaging features. vol.273, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132362
  11. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Prediction of the Histologic Grade Using Pure Diffusion Coefficient and Tumor Size vol.49, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0000000000000028
  12. Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Preoperative MR Imaging to Predict Early Recurrence after Curative Resection. vol.276, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.15142394
  13. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes Suppress Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth in a Rat Model: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, Natural Killer T-Cell Responses, and Histopathological Features vol.2015, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/853506
  14. Diagnosing Borderline Hepatic Nodules in Hepatocarcinogenesis: Imaging Performance vol.205, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.12655
  15. Preoperative Evaluation of the Histological Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: A Meta-Analysis vol.10, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117661
  16. Improving recognition of hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor: Case report and literature review vol.21, pp.17, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5432
  17. Prognostication and response assessment in liver and pancreatic tumors: The new imaging vol.21, pp.22, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6794
  18. The Correlation Between Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 3.0-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histopathology for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma vol.39, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000000274
  19. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-guided MR Spectroscopy in Breast Lesions using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging vol.26, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4000-0
  20. Advanced imaging techniques in the therapeutic response of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma vol.22, pp.20, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4835
  21. Supine Versus Standing Radiographs for Detecting Ischiofemoral Impingement: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis vol.206, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.15.15186
  22. Functional imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma using diffusion-weighted MRI and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in patients on waiting-list for liver transplantation vol.16, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0062-8
  23. Differentiation grade for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma: Assessed by diffusion-weighted imaging at 3.0-T MR vol.85, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.004
  24. 3D analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient histograms in hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grade vol.17, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0103-3
  25. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective analysis of the correlation between qualitative and quantitative DWI and tumour grade vol.72, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.12.017
  26. LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound vol.43, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1325-y
  27. DCE-MRI for Early Prediction of Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma after TACE and Sorafenib Therapy: A Pilot Study vol.102, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.1278
  28. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Retrospective Evaluation of the Correlation Between Gadobenate Dimeglumine–Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathologic Grade vol.42, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000000707
  29. Pseudoglandular Formation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Determines Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diffusion-Weighted MRI vol.22, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2018.22.2.79
  30. Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient values in breast magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors of breast invasive ductal carcinoma vol.4, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000027
  31. Pre-operative ADC predicts early recurrence of HCC after curative resection vol.29, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5642-5
  32. Questionable correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient with the histological grade and microvascular invasion in small hepatocellular carcinoma vol.74, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.01.019
  33. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell exosomes: a novel pathway for tissues repair vol.20, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-019-09761-y
  34. Whole-lesion histogram analysis metrics of the apparent diffusion coefficient: a correlation study with histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma vol.44, pp.9, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02109-w
  35. Estimation of the Extent of Cervical Cancer Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging vol.100, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2019-100-5-298-303
  36. Imaging biomarkers for well and moderate hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative magnetic resonance image and histopathological correlation vol.19, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5574-8
  37. Association Between VEGF Expression and Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Several Tumors—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.9, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9040126
  38. Value of perfusion parameters and histogram analysis of triphasic computed tomography in pre-operative prediction of histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma vol.134, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000001446
  39. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Reflects Tumor Grading and Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma vol.10, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1159/000511384
  40. Study of Diffusion Weighted Imaging Derived Diffusion Parameters as Biomarkers for the Microenvironment in Gliomas vol.11, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.672265
  41. The Benefit of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Evaluating the Invasiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma vol.11, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.719480
  42. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: bridging the gap between research and clinical practice vol.94, pp.1122, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210220