DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of Toxin Gene Diversity, Molecular Epidemiology, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Clostridium difficile Isolated from 12 Hospitals in South Korea

  • Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Seok-Hoon (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Roh, Kyoung-Ho (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Seong-Geun (Department of Laboratory Medicine, CHA University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Wan (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Shin, Myung-Geun (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Mi-Na (Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Shin, Hee-Bong (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Uh, Young (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hyuk-Min (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kwandong University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Won (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2010.06.17
  • Accepted : 2010.08.12
  • Published : 2010.10.01

Abstract

Background: Clostridium difficile is a major cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The objective of this study was to characterize clinical isolates of C. difficile obtained from various regions in Korea with regard to their toxin status, molecular type, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Methods: We analyzed a total of 408 C. difficile isolates obtained between 2006 and 2008 from 408 patients with diarrhea in 12 South Korean teaching hospitals. C. difficile toxin genes tcdA, tcdB, cdtA, and cdtB were detected by PCR. Molecular genotyping was performed by PCR ribotyping. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of the 120 C. difficile isolates were assessed by agar dilution methods. Results: Among 337 toxigenic isolates, 105 were toxin A-negative and toxin B-positive ($A^-B^+$) and 29 were binary toxin-producing strains. PCR ribotyping showed 50 different ribotype patterns. The 5 most frequently occurring ribotypes comprised 62.0% of all identified ribotypes. No isolate was susceptible to cefoxitin, and all except 1 were susceptible to piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam. The resistance rates of isolates to imipenem, cefotetan, moxifloxacin, ampicillin, and clindamycin were 25%, 34%, 42%, 51%, and 60%, respectively. The isolates showed no resistance to metronidazole or vancomycin. Conclusions: This is the first nationwide study on the toxin status, including PCR ribotyping and antimicrobial resistance, of C. difficile isolates in Korea. The prevalence of $A^-B^+$ strains was 25.7%, much higher than that reported from other countries. Binary toxin-producing strains accounted for 7.1% of all strains, which was not rare in Korea. The most prevalent ribotype was ribotype 017, and all $A^-B^+$ strains showed this pattern. We did not isolate strains with decreased susceptibility to metronidazole or vancomycin.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Research Foundation

References

  1. Bartlett JG. Clostridium difficile: history of its role as an enteric pathogen and the current state of knowledge about the organism. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18(S4):S265-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_4.S265
  2. Borriello SP, Davies HA, Kamiya S, Reed PJ, Seddon S. Virulence factors of Clostridium difficile. Rev Infect Dis 1990;12(S2):S185-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/12.Supplement_2.S185
  3. Braun V, Hundsberger T, Leukel P, Sauerborn M, von Eichel- Streiber C. Definition of the single integration site of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile. Gene 1996;181:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00398-8
  4. Hammond GA and Johnson JL. The toxigenic element of Clostridium difficile strain VPI 10463. Microb Pathog 1995;19:203-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-4010(95)90263-5
  5. Borriello SP, Wren BW, Hyde S, Seddon SV, Sibbons P, Krishna MM, et al. Molecular, immunological, and biological characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun 1992;60:4192-9.
  6. Lyerly DM, Barroso LA, Wilkins TD, Depitre C, Corthier G. Characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun 1992;60:4633-9.
  7. Alfa MJ, Kabani A, Lyerly D, Moncrief S, Neville LM, Al-Barrak A, et al. Characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile responsible for a nosocomial outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2706-14.
  8. Popoff MR, Rubin EJ, Gill DM, Boquet P. Actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase produced by a Clostridium difficile strain. Infect Immun 1988;56:2299-306.
  9. Perelle S, Gibert M, Bourlioux P, Corthier G, Popoff MR. Production of a complete binary toxin (actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase) by Clostridium difficile CD196. Infect Immun 1997;65:1402-7.
  10. Barbut F, Mastrantonio P, Delmee M, Brazier J, Kuijper E, Poxton I.. Prospective study of Clostridium difficile infections in Europe with phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of the isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007;13:1048-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01824.x
  11. McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC Jr, Kazakova SV, Sambol SP, et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2433-41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa051590
  12. Warny M, Pepin J, Fang A, Killgore G, Thompson A, Brazier J, et al. Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet 2005;366:1079-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67420-X
  13. Baines SD, O'Connor R, Freeman J, Fawley WN, Harmanus C, Mastrantonio P, et al. Emergence of reduced susceptibility to metronidazole in Clostridium difficile. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;62: 1046-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn313
  14. Muto CA, Pokrywka M, Shutt K, Mendelsohn AB, Nouri K, Posey K, et al. A large outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated disease with an unexpected proportion of deaths and colectomies at a teaching hospital following increased fluoroquinolone use. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:273-80. https://doi.org/10.1086/502539
  15. Kato H, Kato N, Watanabe K, Iwai N, Nakamura H, Yamamoto T, et al. Identification of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:2178-82.
  16. Stubbs S, Rupnik M, Gibert M, Brazier J, Duerden B, Popoff M. Production of actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase (binary toxin) by strains of Clostridium difficile. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000;186:307-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09122.x
  17. O'Neill GL, Ogunsola FT, Brazier JS, Duerden BI. Modification of a PCR ribotyping method for application as a routine typing scheme for Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe 1996;2:205-9. https://doi.org/10.1006/anae.1996.0028
  18. Spigaglia P and Mastrantonio P. Comparative analysis of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates belonging to different genetic lineages and time periods. J Med Microbiol 2004;53:1129-36. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.45682-0
  19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Anaerobic bacteria; Approved standard. 7th ed. CLSI document M11-A7. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2007.
  20. Huang H, Fang H, Weintraub A, Nord CE. Distinct ribotypes and rates of antimicrobial drug resistance in Clostridium difficile from Shanghai and Stockholm. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009;15:1170-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02992.x
  21. Kim H, Riley TV, Kim M, Kim CK, Yong D, Lee K, et al. Increasing prevalence of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive isolates of Clostridium difficile in Korea: impact on laboratory diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1116-7. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01188-07
  22. Shin BM, Kuak EY, Yoo HM, Kim EC, Lee K, Kang JO, et al. Multicentre study of the prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Korea: results of a retrospective study 2000-2005. J Med Microbiol 2008;57:697-701. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.47771-0
  23. Geric B, Rupnik M, Gerding DN, Grabnar M, Johnson S. Distribution of Clostridium difficile variant toxinotypes and strains with binary toxin genes among clinical isolates in an American hospital. J Med Microbiol 2004;53:887-94. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.45610-0
  24. Martin H, Willey B, Low DE, Staempfli HR, McGeer A, Boerlin P, et al. Characterization of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from patients in Ontario, Canada, from 2004 to 2006. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:2999-3004. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02437-07
  25. Keel K, Brazier JS, Post KW, Weese S, Songer JG. Prevalence of PCR ribotypes among Clostridium difficile isolates from pigs, calves, and other species. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:1963-4. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00224-07
  26. Goorhuis A, Bakker D, Corver J, Debast SB, Harmanus C, Notermans DW, et al. Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47:1162-70. https://doi.org/10.1086/592257
  27. Huang H, Weintraub A, Fang H, Nord CE. Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridium difficile. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009;34:516-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.09.012
  28. Drudy D, Quinn T, O'Mahony R, Kyne L, O'Gaora P, Fanning S. High-level resistance to moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin associated with a novel mutation in gyrB in toxin-A-negative, toxin-B-positive Clostridium difficile. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58:1264-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl398
  29. John R and Brazier JS. Antimicrobial susceptibility of polymerase chain reaction ribotypes of Clostridium difficile commonly isolated from symptomatic hospital patients in the UK. J Hosp Infect 2005; 61:11-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2005.01.020

Cited by

  1. Current epidemiology and treatment ofClostridium difficileinfection vol.42, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2010.42.6.362
  2. Tn916-like genetic elements: a diverse group of modular mobile elements conferring antibiotic resistance vol.35, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00283.x
  3. Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridium difficile Infection in a Korean Tertiary Hospital vol.26, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2011.26.10.1258
  4. Cardiovascular diseases and sports medicine vol.54, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.7.674
  5. Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A/B genes by multiplex real-time PCR for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection vol.61, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.035618-0
  6. Clostridium difficile genotypes other than ribotype 078 that are prevalent among human, animal and environmental isolates vol.12, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-48
  7. The continually evolving Clostridium difficile species vol.7, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.12.73
  8. Macro and Micro Diversity of Clostridium difficile Isolates from Diverse Sources and Geographical Locations vol.7, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031559
  9. Evaluation of the Xpert Clostridium difficile Assay for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection vol.32, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2012.32.5.355
  10. Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections in a tertiary-care hospital in Korea vol.19, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03910.x
  11. Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia vol.2, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-21
  12. Incidence and clinical features of Clostridium difficile infection in Korea: a nationwide study vol.141, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268812000581
  13. Susceptibility of Hamsters to Clostridium difficile Isolates of Differing Toxinotype vol.8, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064121
  14. Clinical and Microbiologic Characteristics of Clostridium difficile Infection Caused by Binary Toxin Producing Strain in Korea vol.45, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2013.45.2.175
  15. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clostridium Difficile Clinical Isolates in Iran vol.15, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.5189
  16. To the Editor: Molecular epidemiology of toxigenic Clostridium difficile isolates in Korea vol.142, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268813003051
  17. Molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile in a tertiary hospital of China vol.63, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.068668-0
  18. Epidemiology and clinical features of toxigenic culture-confirmed hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection: a multicentre prospective study in tertiary hospitals of South Korea vol.63, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.070672-0
  19. The changes of PCR ribotype and antimicrobial resistance of Clostridium difficile in a tertiary care hospital over 10 years vol.63, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.072082-0
  20. Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients: A Single Center Study vol.12, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2014.12.4.299
  21. Comparison of Supplemented Brucella Agar and Modified Clostridium difficile Agar for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Clostridium difficile vol.34, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.6.439
  22. Low Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in Slaughter Pigs in Korea vol.78, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-14-493
  23. Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method for Simultaneous Identification and Toxigenic Type Characterization of Clostridium difficile From Stool Samples vol.35, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2015.35.3.306
  24. Genomic Epidemiology of a Protracted Hospital Outbreak Caused by a Toxin A-Negative Clostridium difficile Sublineage PCR Ribotype 017 Strain in London, England vol.53, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00648-15
  25. Prevalence and molecular types of Clostridium difficile isolates from faecal specimens of patients in a tertiary care centre vol.64, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000169
  26. Characterisation of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa vol.35, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2717-6
  27. Identification of Clostridium difficile RT078 From Patients and Environmental Surfaces in Zhejiang Province, China vol.37, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.58
  28. Clostridium difficile Infection vol.4, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.ei10-0007-2015
  29. Predominance of Clostridium difficile Ribotypes 017 and 078 among Toxigenic Clinical Isolates in Southern Taiwan vol.11, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166159
  30. Toxin A-negative toxin B-positive ribotype 017 Clostridium difficile is the dominant strain type in patients with diarrhoea attending tuberculosis hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa vol.36, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2790-x
  31. Toxinotyping and Sequencing of Clostridium difficile Isolates from Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Northern India vol.4, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00033
  32. Comparative Genome Analysis and Global Phylogeny of the Toxin Variant Clostridium difficile PCR Ribotype 017 Reveals the Evolution of Two Independent Sublineages vol.55, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01296-16
  33. Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from two Korean hospitals vol.12, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174716
  34. Characterization of Clostridium difficile Strains Isolated from Patients with C. difficile -associated Disease in Korea vol.8, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.5.06
  35. Nosocomial transmission of Clostridium difficile Genotype ST81 in a General Teaching Hospital in China traced by whole genome sequencing vol.7, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09878-8
  36. The clinical features and infectious etiologies of acute diarrhea in immunocompromised hosts vol.32, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.2017.32.2.191
  37. Molecular characterization, toxin detection and resistance testing of human clinical Clostridium difficile isolates from Lebanon vol.308, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2018.01.004
  38. Risk factors for poor outcome in community-onset Clostridium difficile infection vol.7, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0365-6
  39. Clostridium difficile in Asia: Opportunities for One Health Management vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed4010007
  40. Clostridium difficile ribotype 017 – characterization, evolution and epidemiology of the dominant strain in Asia vol.8, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2019.1621670
  41. Different molecular characteristics and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Clostridium difficile in the Asia-Pacific region vol.8, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2019.1682472
  42. Status of vaccine research and development for Clostridium difficile vol.37, pp.50, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.052
  43. Prevalence, toxin gene profile, genotypes and antibiotic susceptibility of Clostridium difficile in a tertiary care hospital in Taif, Saudi Arabia vol.38, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmm.ijmm_20_300
  44. Production of p-cresol by Decarboxylation of p-HPA by All Five Lineages of Clostridioides difficile Provides a Growth Advantage vol.11, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.757599
  45. Correlation between antibiotic consumption and the incidence of healthcare facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infection: a retrospective chart review and analysis vol.10, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00986-9