DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical Simulation of an Impinging Jet with Various Nozzle-to-strip Distances in the Air-knife System

  • Received : 2009.08.05
  • Accepted : 2010.12.13
  • Published : 2010.12.01

Abstract

When galvanized steel strip is produced through a continuous hot-dip galvanizing process, the thickness of the adhered zinc film is controlled by impinging a thin plane nitrogen gas jet. The thickness of the zinc film is generally affected by impinging pressure distribution, its gradient and shearing stress at the steel strip. These factors are influenced by static pressure of gas spraying at air knife nozzle, a nozzle-to-strip distance and strip and a geometric shape of the air knife, as well. At industries, galvanized steel strip is produced by changing static pressure of gas and a distance between the air knife nozzle and strip based on experimental values but remaining a geometric shape of nozzle. Splashing and check-mark strain can generally occur when a distance between the air knife nozzle and strip is too short, while ability of zinc removal can lower due to pressure loss of impinging jet when a distance between the air knife nozzle and strip is too long. In present study, buckling of the jet and change of static pressure are observed by analyzing flow characteristics of the impinging jet. The distance from the nozzle exit to the strip varies from 6 mm to 16 mm by an increment of 2 mm. Moreover, final coating thickness with change of a distance between the air knife nozzle and strip is compared with each case. An ability of zinc removal with the various distances is predicted by numerically calculating the final coating thickness.

Keywords

References

  1. J. M. Buchlin, M. Manna, M. Amalsteen, M. L. Riethmuller, and M. Dubois, European Coating Symposium on the Mechanism of Thin Film Coaling, p. 168, World Scientific, Singapore (1996).
  2. J. A. Thornton and H. F. Graff. Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 7B, 607 (1976).
  3. Y. Takeishi, A. Yamauchi, and S. Miyauchi, Tetsu-to-Hagane, 80, 37 (1995).
  4. C. V. Tu and D. H. Wood, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 13, 364 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1777(96)00093-3
  5. H. K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, Computational Fluid Dynamics, p. 98, Pearson Prentice Hall, London, 2007.
  6. J. H. Ferziger and M. Peric, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, p. 143, Berlin, 2002.
  7. J. J. Schauer and R. H. Eustis, Tech. Report 3, Dept. Mech. Eng., Stanford Univ., (1963).
  8. S. Beltaos, ASCE J. Hydraulic Div., 102, 1177 (1972).
  9. A. Katsuya and O. Tsuyoshi, 7th Int. Conf. on Zinc and Zinc Alloy Coated Steel Sheet, p. 177, ISIJ, Tokyo, (2007).