Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회 논문집)

Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회)
권호 표지

The Influence of the Application Methods of Direct Analysis Method for the Evaluation of Frame Stability

골조 안정성 평가를 위한 직접해석법의 적용 방법에 따른 영향

  • Received : 2010.04.21
  • Accepted : 2010.07.28
  • Published : 2010.08.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the methods of application of the direct analysis method, using the load amplification factor suggested by the KBC 2009 design code, for the evaluation of frame stability. For this purpose, the direct analysis method was performed for three-story-one-bay and five-story-three-bay unbraced steel frames with various notional loads, bending stiffness reductions, and factor B2s. The results of the analyses were compared with the results of the second-order inelastic analysis to evaluate the influence of the applied methods. The scale of the frame, the axial load ratio, and the axial load distribution pattern were added to the main parameters to investigate the external effects. The research results showed that the influence of the methods of application of the direct analysis method is not significant in the case of the required axial strength and the application of the additional notional loads; and that the application of the factor B2 with the story stiffness concept to the direct analysis method is appropriate for the required flexural strength.

본 연구는 강구조 설계기준(KBC 2009)에서 골조 안정성 평가를 위해 제시한 하중증폭계수를 적용한 직접해석법의 적용 방법에 따른 영향을 해석적 방법을 통해 평가하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 KBC 2009에서 제안하고 있는 가상수평하중 적용 방법, 휨강성 감소 방법, B2 계수 산정 방법 등을 각각 적용한 직접해석을 3층 1스팬 및 5층 3스팬 비가새 강구조 골조에 대해 실시하고, 그 해석 결과를 2차 비탄성 해석 결과와 비교하여 각 적용 방법의 영향을 평가하였다. 직접해석법 적용 방법 이외에 외적 요인의 영향을 고찰하기 위해 골조의 규모, 기둥의 축력비, 축력의 층별분포 등도 변수로 추가하였다. 연구 결과 소요압축강도는 직접해석법 적용 방법에 따른 차이가 크지 않은 것으로 나타났으며, 소요휨강도는 가상수평하중 누계 및 추가 적용, 층강성 개념 B2 계수를 직접해석법에 적용시 적절한 결과를 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김희동, 이명재(2009) 하중증폭계수를 적용한 비가새 골조 2차 해석 평가. 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회. 제21권, 제6호, pp.627-636.
  2. 김희동(2010) 하중증폭계수를 적용한 비대칭 비가새 골조 2차 해석 평가. 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회. 제22권, 제1호, pp.87-97.
  3. 대한건축학회(2009) 국토해양부 고시 건축구조기준, 대한건축학회.
  4. Chen, W.F. and Sohal, I. (1995) Plastic Design and Second-order Analysis of Steel Frames, Springer-Verlag, USA.
  5. Galambos, T.V. (1968) Structural Members and Frames, PrenticeHall, USA.
  6. Galambos, T.V. (1998) Guide to the Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures. 5th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.
  7. Kim, H.D. and Lee M.J. (2002) The Influence of the P-$\Delta$ Effects on the Behavior of Unbraced Frames. Proc. International Symposium of Steel Structures, pp.333-344.
  8. Kim, H.D. and Lee M.J. (2009) Experimental Investigation of the P-$\Delta$ Effects and Factor B2 of Low-rise Unbraced Steel Frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp.131-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03249488
  9. Kim, S.E. and Chen, W.F. (1998) LRFD Steel Design Using Advanced Analysis, CRC Press, USA.
  10. Surovek-Maleck, A.E. and White, D.W. (2004a) Alternative approaches for elastic analysis and design of steel frames. I: Overview. Journal of structural engineering, ASCE, pp.1186-1196.
  11. Surovek-Maleck, A.E. and White, D.W. (2004b) Alternative approaches for elastic analysis and design of steel frames. II: Verification studies. Journal of structural engineering, pp.1197-1205.
  12. Surovek-Maleck, A.E. and Ziemian, R.D. (2005) The direct analysis method : Bridging the gap from linear elastic analysis to advanced analysis in steel frame design, ASCE.
  13. White, D.W., Surovek-Maleck, A.E., Alemdar, B.N., Chang, C.J., Kim, Y.D., and Kuchenbecker, G.H. (2006) Stability analysis and design of steel building frames using the 2005 AISC specification. International Journal of Steel Structures, pp.71-91.