Comparative Study of Regional-scale Ecological Risk Assessment used in Developed Countries

지역단위 생태위해성평가 선진국사례 분석

  • Shin, Yu-Jin (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Mi (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • An, Youn-Joo (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2010.02.10
  • Accepted : 2010.06.22
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Ecological risk assessment (ERA) has been used to establish environmental quality standards or evaluate ecological risk in site-specific areas. The scope of ERA was expanded based on regions, and the concept of regional-scale ecological risk assessment was recently introduced in developed countries. In the present study, regional ERA approaches of relative risk model (RRM), contaminants in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (CATS) model, and procedure for ecological tired assessment of risks (PETAR) in advanced countries were extensively investigated. Regional ERA was compared with traditional ERA process. Stressors, receptor and response in traditional ERA were replaced with sources of stressors, habitats, and ecological impacts, respectively in regional ERA. This study introduces the concept and assessment process of regional ERA, and provides a wide perspective how the relative ERA could be applied in Korean ecosystem.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립환경과학원, 납, 카드뮴 및 수은 오염에 대한 위해성평가 기법 연구, 2005a.
  2. 국립환경과학원, 위해우려물질 평가 기법 연구[II], 2005b.
  3. 국립환경과학원, 위해우려물질 평가기법연구[III], 2005c.
  4. 국립환경과학원, 화학물질 위해성 평가 보고서(납 및 그화합물), 2006a.
  5. 국립환경과학원, 화학물질 위해성 평가 보고서(니켈 및 그 화합물), 2006b.
  6. 국립환경과학원, 화학물질 위해성 평가 보고서(비소 및 그 화합물), 2006c.
  7. 국립환경과학원, 화학물질 위해성 평가 보고서(수은 및 그 화합물), 2006d.
  8. 국립환경과학원, 화학물질 위해성 평가 보고서(카드뮴 및 그 화합물), 2006e.
  9. 국립환경과학원, 화학물질 위해성 평가 보고서(크롬 및 그 화합물), 2006f.
  10. 환경부, 국립환경과학원 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구(III) -인체 및 수생태계 위해성평가 체계 구축, 2006.
  11. 환경부, 무척추동물 생물지표를 이용한 환경오염물질의 생태영향 현장적용기법개발, 2009c.
  12. 환경부, 수서생물 현장이식 노출평가 및 환경오염물질의 생태영향평가 현장적용기법 개발, 2009b.
  13. 환경부, 위해성 평가 실시(납, 수은, 카드뮴) 및 위해관리대책 수립방안 마련 연구, 2007a.
  14. 환경부, 위해성 평가 실시(비소, 크롬, 니켈, 벤젠) 및 위해 관리대책 수립방안 마련 연구, 2007b.
  15. 환경부, 위해우려물질 선정 및 평가연구, 2003.
  16. 환경부, 지표생물을 이용한 환경오염물질의 생태영향 평가 현장적용기법 개발에 관한 연구, 2009a.
  17. Landis WG. Regional Scale Ecological Risk Assessment Using the Relative Risk Model, CRC Press LLC 2005; 1-35.
  18. Landis WG. Population-scale assessment endpoints in ecological risk assessment part 1: Reflections of stakeholder values, Integr Environ Assess Manag 2005; 2(1): 86-91.
  19. Moraes F and Molander S. A procedure for ecological tiered assessment of risk (PETAR), Human and Ecol Risk Assess 2004; 10: 349-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030490438427
  20. RIVM. Application of CATS models for regional risk-assessment of toxicants, 1996; Report nr. 719102039: 1-61.
  21. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments (Interim Final), EPA 540-R-97-006 OSWER 9285 1997; 7-25 PB91-963211.
  22. Wiegers JK, Feder HM, Mortensen LS, Shaw DG, Wilson VJ and Landis WG. A regional multiple-stressor rankbased ecological risk assessment for the fjord of Port Valdez, Alaska, Human Ecological Risk Assessment 1998; 4: 1125-1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039891285036
  23. Wiegers JK, Feder HM, Mortensen LS, Shaw DG, Wilson VJ and Landis WG. Relative risk assessment methods extracted from a multiple-stressor ecological risk assessment for Port Valdez, Alaska, Institute of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 1997; 9701.