Gender Characteristics in Contemporary Men's Fashion - Focusing on the Characteristics of Metrosexual and $\ddot{U}$bersexual -

현대 남성패션에 나타난 젠더 특성 - 메트로 섹슈얼과 위버섹슈얼의 특성을 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Chong-Yon (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University) ;
  • JeKal, Mee (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Youn-Hee (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2009.09.03
  • Accepted : 2010.07.30
  • Published : 2010.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review changes of gender identity of men as a sexual role changes and their cognition on fashion and to analyze changes and features of their fashion required in the diversified era and suggest implications for future men's fashion design. To understand a correlation between a change of men's gender styles and fashion and aesthetic features and differences by gender style, this study analyzed significant brands of the men's design market. The results of this study are as followings. First, metrosexual and uebersexual were mixed in the 1990's and the 2000's. The ratio of uebersexual in the 1990's was higher as three times as metrosexual. On the other hand, the ratio of metrosexual in the 2000's was higher than uebersexual by about 3.5%. It implicates that there were significant changes in design of men's clothes between the 1990's and the 2000's. Second, aesthetic properties and differences of metrosexual and uebersexual obtained from the survey. Metrosexual fashion uses almost all details and has no limit in using materials and accessories. The other side, uebersexual fashion rarely has details. In conclusion, this study showed that the relationship between male and fashion on the social and cultural phenomena. which have been recognized that there is a low correlation, is being newly established as a sexual role changes by gender.

Keywords

References

  1. 정부효 (2003). 피할 수 없다면 즐겨라. 서울: 도서출판 무한, p. 203.
  2. 파란통신 (2004년 12월 26일). 우리시대 남녀의 조용한 혁명 Mr. Beauty & Ms. Strong. 마케팅 보고서, 2
  3. Julia T. Wood (2005). Gendered lives: communication, gender, and culture. 6th ed. 한희정 역 (2006). 젠더에 갇힌 삶. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, p. 20.
  4. Anthony Giddens (1991). Sociology. 김미숙 외 역(1992). 현대사회학. 서울: 을유문화사, pp. 120-125
  5. 윤가연 (1998). 성문화와 심리. 서울: 학지사, p.17.
  6. Stoller, Robert (1968). Sex and Gender: On the Development of Masculinity and Femininity. New York: Science House p. 383.
  7. Julia T. Wood. (2005). Gendered lives: communication, gender, and culture. 6th ed. 한희정 역 (2006). 젠더에 갇힌 삶. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, pp. 35-36.
  8. 강혜원 (1991). 의상사회심리. 서울: 교문사, p. 186.
  9. Simpson, Mark (15 November 1994). Here come the mirror men. The Independent.
  10. Salzman, Marian (2005). Future of men. 이현주 역 (2006). 남자의 미래. 서울: 김영사, p. 46.
  11. Salzman, Marian. (2005). Future of men. 이현주 역 (2006). 남자의 미래. 서울: 김영사,, pp. 48-49.
  12. 권지은 (2003). 현대 남성 패션에 나타난 메트로섹슈얼 현상에 관한 연구. 국민대학교 테크노디자인 대학원 석사학위논문, p. 10.
  13. Wikipedia online. retrieved 2007, August 8, from http://en.wikipedia.org
  14. Salzman, Marian, (2005). Future of men. 이현주 역 (2006). 남자의 미래. 서울: 김영사, p. 71.
  15. Simpson, Mark,(15 November 1994). Here come the mirror men. The Independent p. 72.
  16. Salzman, Marian, (2005). Future of men. 이현주 역 (2006). 남자의 미래. 서울: 김영사, p. 72.
  17. 사진출처: FirstVIEW Collection Online. retrieved 2007, March 13, from http://firstview.com
  18. 채금석 (1996). 현대 남성수트의 변천과 미학적 특성. 복식, 30, p. 251.
  19. 사진출처: FirstVIEW Collection Online. retrieved 2007, March 15 , from http://firstview.com