Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tissue conditioner in edentulous patients, depending on the time and the thickness of the changes affect the dimensional stability

무치악 환자에서 조직양화제(tissue conditioner)가 시간과 두께에 따라 체적안정성의 변화에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2010.09.11
  • Accepted : 2010.10.15
  • Published : 2010.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study evaluated the linear dimensional changes with the factor of time and thickness using of three commercially available tissue conditioners (Coe-Comport, Visco-Gel, Soft-Liner). The thickness of materials were changed (1.5mm, 3.0mm) and the percentage changes in dimension were measured at 1h(baseline), 12h, 24h, 3 days and 7days after specimen preparation. The obtained data were analyzed by ANOVA with the SAS/PC statistical package. From the results, large differences appear between the various tissue conditioners. The results suggested that the period recommended for forming functional impression would be 36h to 3days after insertion in the mouth. Depending on the type of tissue conditioner over time, as there were significant differences in the elastic change(p<0.05). Tissue conditioner of the 1.5mm, 3.0mm thickness were significantly different by the dimensional stability(p<0.05). Elastic deformation of the ideal itself, and resilient when compared only the look, Visco-Gel 3.0mm group, stability was the most stable volume. In addition, it is important to select tissue conditioners suitable for functional impression because of the wide range of dimensional stability among the materials.

이 연구는 임상적으로 많이 쓰이는 3종의 조직양화제(Coe-comfort, GC Soft-Liner, Visco-Gel)의 시간에 따른 체적 안정성을 비교하였다. 시편은 10mm의 반경으로 두께를 1.5mm, 3.0mm로 각각 제작하여 두께에 따른 차이를 비교하였다. 체적의 변화는 시편 제작 후 1시간 (baseline), 12시간, 24시간, 36시간, 3일, 7일에 측정하였다. SAS 6.04 통계 package program을 이용하여 ANOVA분석하였다. 실험한 조직양화제에서는 점탄성을 상실하여 조직양화제를 교체하거나 기공 과정을 하기에 적합한 시간은 변형이 적은 혼합 후 36시간~3일이었다. Tissue conditioner의 종류에 따라 시간의 경과에 따른 탄성 변화량에는 유의할 만한 차이가 있었다(p<0.05). 조직양화제 1.5mm, 3.0mm 두께에 의해 체적안정성에 유의한 차이가 있었다(p<0.05). 자체의 이상적인 탄성 변형과 복원력만을 비교 하였을 때를 보면, Visco-Gel 3.0mm군에서 가장 안정적인 체적안정성을 보였다. 또한, 조직 양화제는 재료 간의 체적 안정성에 다양한 범위가 있어 기능인상에 적합한 것을 선택을 하는 것이 중요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bergman B. Carlsson G.E. : Clinical long-term study of complete denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent 53:53-16, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90065-4
  2. Lamine G. A. : The retention of complete detures. J Am Dent Assoc 55:502-508, 1957. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1957.0211
  3. Roberto von KK.: Tissue conditioners. J Prosthet Dent 25: 244-250, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90184-3
  4. Murata H, Hamada T, Djulaeha E, Nikawa H.: Rheology of tissue conditioners. J Prosthet Dent 79:188-99, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70215-X
  5. Hong G, Li Y, Maeda T, Mizumachi W, et al.: Influence of storage methods on the surface roughness of tissue conditioners. Dent Materials. Mar;27(2):153-8, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.153
  6. Pound E. : Conditioning of denture patients. J Am Dent Assoc 64:461-468, 1962. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0123
  7. Jones DW, Hall GC, Sutow EJ, et al. : Chemical and molecular weight analyses of prosthodontic soft polymers. J Dent Res. May;70(5):874-9, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700050201
  8. Jones DW, Sutow EJ, Hall GC, et al. : Dental soft polymers, plasticizer composition and leachability. Dental Materials 4 : 1-6, 1984.
  9. Braden M., Causten B.E. : Tissue conditioners. 3. Water immersion characteristics. J Dent Res 62:421-428, 1989.
  10. Jepson N.F.A. : Age change in the ciscoelasticity of a temporary soft lining material. J Dent 21: 244-247, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90137-F
  11. Murata H, Narasaki Y, Hamada T, McCabe JF. An alcohol-free tissue conditioner-a laboratory evaluation. J Dent. Apr;34(4):307-15, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.005
  12. Boucher C.O : The relining of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 30: 521-526, 1973.
  13. Starke D.E. : Physical properties tissue-conditioning materials as used in functional impressions. J Prosthet Dent 27:111-119, 1972.
  14. Wilson HJ, Tomlin HR, Osborne J : The assessment of temporary soft materials used in prosthetic Dentistry. British Dental Journal 37: 133, 1969.
  15. Wilson, H.J. : Tissue conditioners and functional impression materials. British Dental Jornal 121:9-16, 1966.
  16. McCarthy J.A., Moser J.B. : Tissue conditioners and functional impression materials. J Oral Rehabil 5: 357-64, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb01254.x
  17. Jones DW, Hall GC, Sutow EJ, et al. : Chemical and molecular weight analysis of prosthodontic soft polymers. J Dent Res 70:874-879, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700050201
  18. Kawano, F.,Tada,N. Nagao,K. et al. : The influence of soft lining materials on pressure distribution. J Prosthet Dent 65:567-575, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90301-C
  19. Graham BS, Jones DW, Sutow EJ : Clinical implications of resilient denture lining material research. Part 1: Flexibility and elasticity. J Prosthet Dent 62:421-428, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90174-1
  20. Murata H, Kawamura M, Hamada T, et al. : Dimensional stability and weight changes of tissue conditioners. J Oral Rehabil 28(10):918-23, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00736.x
  21. Braden M. Tissue conditioners. II. Rheologic properties. J Dent Res 49:4961-501, 1970.
  22. Pissiotis A, Panagiotouni E, Sofou A, Diakoyanni I, Kaloyannides A. : Dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of tissue conditioning materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. Dec;3(2):55-59, 1994.
  23. Murata H, Hong G, Li YA, Hamada T. : Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones. J Prosthet Dent. Mar;93(3):274-81.2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.011
  24. Chander S, Hill M, Moore D, Morrow L. : Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. Jun;15(2): 67-71. 2007.
  25. Kanie T, Terao R, Arikawa H, Kadokawa A. : Deterioration of the soft lining materials with the denture cleansers. J Jpn Prostodont Soc 36:488-495, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2186/jjps.36.488
  26. Brudevold F. : A basic study of the chewing forced of a denture wearer. J Am Dent Assoc 43: 45-51,1951. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1951.0163
  27. Anusavice KJ : Phillip's Science of Dental Materials, 11th ed. p721-757, st. Louis, Saunders, 2003.
  28. Saitoh S, Sasaki K, Nezu T, Taira M. : Viscoelastic behavior of commercially available tissue conditioners under compression.Dent Mater J. Aug 7;29(4):461-8, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-130
  29. Jones DW, Sutow EJ, Hall GC, et al. : Dental soft polymers-Plasticiser composition and leachability. Dental Materials 4:1-7, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80080-0
  30. Jones DW, Sutow EJ, Graham BS : Gel strength and rate of gelation of soft polymers. Dental Materials 7:138-144, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90061-3
  31. De Mot B, De Clercq M, Rousseeuw P. : Visco-elastic properties of four surrently used tissue conditioners. J Oral Rehabil 11: 419-427, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1984.tb00595.x
  32. Graham BS, Jones DW, Sutow EJ : An in vivo and in vitro study of the loss of plasticizer from soft polymer-gel materials. J Dent Res. May;70(5):870-3, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700050101
  33. Graham BS, Jones DW, Thomson JP, et al. : Clinical compliance of two resilient denture liners. J Oral Rehabil 117: 157-163, 1990.