A Study on Treatment of CSOs by Vortex Separator and Continuous Fiber-Filter System

Vortex separator와 연속식 섬유사여과를 이용한 CSOs 처리연구

  • 이범준 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 나지훈 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 김진성 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 주재영 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 배윤선 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 정인호 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 박철휘 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부)
  • Received : 2010.01.18
  • Accepted : 2010.08.13
  • Published : 2010.08.15

Abstract

This study was conducted to confirm the CSOs characteristics, and to estimate treatment efficiency of CSO treatment process. Flowrate was average $53,500m^3$/d, maximum $58,100m^3$/d during dry season, but after rain-fall, the flowrate was increased more than twice that of the dry season. And, water pollution concentrations, such as $COD_{Cr}$, SS, $BOD_5$, TN and TP of after rain-fall, were also increased. Thus, for more efficient treatment of pollutants during rainy season, The vortex separator and continuous fiber filter devices were used. From the results on particle range, removal efficiency of particle was 99.7% at the particle size range of $40{\sim}100{\mu}m$ but decreased as 55-80% at the below $40{\mu}m$. The removal efficiencies of $COD_{Cr}$, SS, TN and TP were approx. 70, 60, 70 and 50, respectively during the dry season and approx. 50, 50, 8 and 18% during the rainy season. Also, when compared with the primary sediment basin, $COD_{Cr}$, SS, TN and TP removal efficiencies were high. especially, at the case of TN and TP, TN was more removed than TP because of higher conversion factor value. But we needed more study for the injection of a coagulants to get more stable treatment efficiency for soluble pollutants. Consequently, This process can be used for CSOs treatment as well as replace the primary sedimentation basin during the dry season.

Keywords

References

  1. 윤현식, 이두진, 박영숙., 2006, 입경분포분석을 통한 합류식 하수관거 월류수(CSO) 오염물질 침강성 예측, 상하수도 학회지 20(2), pp. 295-302
  2. 방기웅, 이준호., 2001, swirl 농축분리기를 이용한 합류식 하수관 월류수 처리, 대한환경공학회지, 23(1), pp. 21-30
  3. 한정균, 주재영, 이범준, 나지훈, 박철휘., 2009, 합류식 하수관거 월류수 처리를 위한 와류형 분리장치의 최적 운전조건, 상하수도학회지, 23(5), pp.557-564
  4. 방기웅, 이준호, 유명진., 1997, 도시소유역에서의 비점오염원 유출특성에 관한 연구, 한국수질보전학회지, 13(1). pp. 79-99
  5. 환경부, 2007년 하수도 통계
  6. 중랑물재생센터, 2007년 운영 보고서
  7. 社団法人, 1982, 日本下水道協會, 合流式下水道越流水對第と 暫定指針
  8. 安齊 史郞, 1990, スク-ル分水槽 による合流式下水道の汚染負荷の削減 -スク-ル分水槽機能調査から-, 用水と 廢水, 32(11), pp. 30-40
  9. Moffa. P. E., 1990, Control and treatment of combined sewer overflows, Van Nostrand Reinhold. N.Y.
  10. Andoh R. Y. G, Saul, A. J., 2002, The use of hydrodynamic separators and screening systems to improve water quality, Sewer Processes and Networks. Paris. France, pp. 219-229
  11. Brombach H., Xanthopoulos, C., Hahn H. H., Pisano, W. C., 1993, Experience with separators for combined sewer overflow control, Water Environment & Technology 27(5), pp. 93-104
  12. Chebbo, G. and bachoc, A., 1992, Characterization of suspended soilds in urban wet weather discharges, Wat. Sci.Tech., vol. 25(8), pp. 171-179
  13. EPA, 1999, Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet Hydrodynamic Separator, U.S. E.P.A pp. 832-F-99-017
  14. Geiger. W. F., 1998, Combined sewer overflow treatment ; Knowledge or speculation, Wat, Sci. Tech., Vol. 38, No. 38, pp. 1-8
  15. Heinking. G. and Wilcoxon. N.. 1985, Use of a swir concentrator for combined sewer overflow management." J. WPCF. 57(5), pp. 398-402
  16. H.I.L, 1991, Technology Inc, Storm King
  17. Field R. and O'Connor T. P., 1996. "Swirl technology : enhancement of design, evaluation, and application," Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE. 122(EE8), pp. 741-748 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1996)122:8(741)
  18. Michael G. and Mark D. and Christopher A., 2004, Wastewater treatment using hydrodynamic vortex separators, CIWEM 2nd National Conference, Wakefield, UK, 13-15 September pp. 79-87