한국응용곤충학회지 (Korean journal of applied entomology)

  • 제49권2호
  • /
  • Pages.105-113
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1225-0171(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-545X(eISSN)
한국응용곤충학회 (Korean Society of Applied Entomology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국가 장기 생태 연구지(남산, 지리산, 월악산)의 신갈나무림과 소나무림에서 포획된 나방류의 종조성 및 종다양도

Species Composition and Species Diversity of Moths (Lepidoptera) on Quercus mongolica forests sand Pinus densiflora forests, in Korean National Long-term Ecological Research Sites (Mt. Nam, Mt. Jiri, Mt. Wolak)

  • 이훈복 (서울여자대학교, 환경생명과학부) ;
  • 김현정 (서울여자대학교, 환경생명과학부)
  • Yi, Hoon-Bok (Seoul Women's University, Division of Environmental and Life Science) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Jung (Seoul Women's University, Division of Environmental and Life Science)
  • 투고 : 2010.05.19
  • 심사 : 2010.06.22
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 2005년과 2006년 6월부터 9월까지 남산, 지리산, 월악산의 신갈나무림, 소나무림에서 유브이 버킷 라이트 트랩(22 W)을 이용하여 나방을 포획하였고 식생 및 삼림의 주요 1차 소비자인 나방류(불나방과, 자나방과, 밤나방과, 재주나방과, 명나방과)의 종다양성을 시공간적으로 비교하였다. 본 연구기간동안 국가장기생태연구지에서 포획된 나방의 종수는 435종이었다. 포획된 나방의 개체수는 월악산에서 가장 높았고, 지리산, 남산 순이었다. ANOVA 분석결과 개체수를 종속변수로 하였을때는 조사시기에 대해 유의한 차이가 나타났고 종풍부도의 경우에는 조사시기와 지역에 따른 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 다변량분석 방법인 다차원분석법을 사용하였을때, 나방의 군집구조는 각 지역별로 뚜렷이 구분되어 나타났지만, 같은 지역내의 산림유형에 따른 구분은 명확하지 않았다.

Moths were collected using a 22W UV black light trap in June through September in 2005 and May, June, August and September in 2006. The study sites were Namsan (Mt. Nam), Jirisan (Mt. Jiri), Woraksan (Mt. Worak) which are part of the Korean National Long Term Ecological Research (KNLTER). There were two common forest communities, Quercus mongolica and Pinus densiflora. The purpose of this study was to compare species diversity of the major plant feeding Lepidoptera in the two forest types at the regional KNLTER sites. We collected a total of 435 species from the KLTER sites in 2005 and 2006. Abundance of moths was highest at Woraksan (Mt. Worak) followed by Jirisan (Mt. Jiri). The Namsan (Mt. Nam) site had the lowest, with five families (Arctiidae, Geometridae, Noctuidae, Notodontidae, and Pyralidae). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed statistically significant differences at sampling date in species abundance as a response variable and at site in species richness as another response variable. Although we expected a distinct cluster with the forest type at each study site, one of ordination analyses, nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMS), showed distinct clusters with the moth assemblages at each site only but NMS did not show any distinct cluster with the different forest types at each site as we expected.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allen, C.D., K.A. Macalady, H. Chenchouni, D. Bachelet, N. McDowell, M. Vennetier, T. Kitzberger, A. Rigling, D.D. Breshears, E.H. (Ted) Hogg, P. Gonzalez, R. Fensham, Z. Zhang, J. Castro, N. Demidova, J.H. Lim, G. Allard, S.W. Running, A. Semerci and N. Cobb. 2010. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 259: 660-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
  2. Brown, Jr. K.S. and R.W. Hutchings. 1997. Disturbance, fragmentation and the dynamics of diversity in Amazonian forest butterflies. pp. 91-110. In Laurance, W. F., Bierrgaard. R. O. (eds.), Biological dynamics of tropical forest fragments. Chicago University Press, Chicago, USA.
  3. Fry R. and D. Lonsdale. 1991. Habitat Conservation for Insects - a Neglected Green Issue. Amat. Entomol. 21: 260.
  4. Gange, A. C. and V.K. Brown. 1989. Insect herbivory affects size and variability in plant populations. Oikos 56: 351-356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565620
  5. Grimaldi, D. and M.S. Engel. 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge University Press, U.K.
  6. Huntly, H. 1991. Herbivores and the dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 22: 477-503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.002401
  7. IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller (eds.). Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment. Reprot of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univeristy Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, New York, NY, USA.
  8. Kang, D.Y., J.H. Oh, and W.T. Kwon. 2003. The research on the trends of climate change by observatory records in the recent Korean peninsula. J. Kor. Meteorol. Soc. 13: 396-397.
  9. Kil,B.S., E.S. Jeon, Y.S. Kim, C.H. Kim, K.W. Yun, H.G. Yoo, B.S. Kim and H.C. Kim. 1998. Flora and Distribution of Mt. Nam Park, Seoul. Kor. J. Ecol. 21: 603-631.
  10. Kitching, R.L., A.G. Orr, L. Thalib, H. Mitchell, M.S. Hopkins and A.W. Graham. 2000. Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 284-297. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00490.x
  11. Langor, D.W. and J.R. Spence. 2006. Arthropods as ecological indicators. For. Chron. 82: 344-350. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc82344-3
  12. Lee, C.S., H.J. Cho, J.S. Mun, J.E. Kim and N.J. Lee. 1998. Ecological diagnosis on Mt. Nam in Seoul, Korea. Kor. J. Ecol. 21: 713-721.
  13. Lim, J.H., J.H. Shin, D.K. Lee and S.J. Suh. 2006. Climate change impacts on forest ecosystems: Research status and challenges in Korea. Kor. J. of Agr. Forest and Meteorology 8, 199-207.
  14. McCune, B. and J.B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design. Gleneden Beach, OR.
  15. McCune, B. and M.J. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4.0. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.
  16. MOE [Ministry of Environment]. 2005. Endemic species of korea. pp.140-161. Nature Resources Division. Nature Conservation Bureau. MOE, Korea.
  17. Muir, P.S., R.L. Mattingly, J.C. Tappeiner II, J.D. Bailey, W.E. Elliott, J.C. Hagar, J.C. Miller, E.B. Peterson, and E.E. Starkey. 2002. Managing for Biodiversity in Young Douglasfir Forests of Western Oregon. Biological Science Report, USGS/BRD/BSR-2002-0006. USGS, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, OR.
  18. Oliver, I. and A.J. Beattie. 1996. Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv. Biol. 10: 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010099.x
  19. Park, H.C. 2005. The research about the effects of the climate change on insects. J. Korea Nat. Conserv. 130: 38-47.
  20. Parmesan, C. and G. Yohe. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286
  21. Parsons, G.L., G. Cassis, A.R. Moldenke, J.D. Lattin, N.H. Anderson, J.C. Miller, P. Hammond and T.D. Schowalter. 1991. Invertebrates of the H.J. pp.168. Andrews Experimental Forest, Western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An annotated list of insects and other arthropods. U.S.D.A., U.S.F.S., P.N.W. Research Station, General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-290.
  22. Schowalter, T.D., W.W. Hargrove and D.A. Crossley Jr. 1986. Herbivory in forested ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ent. 31: 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.001141
  23. Stamp, N.E. and T.M. Casey. 1993. Caterpillars. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  24. Summerville, K.S. and T.O. Crist. 2003. Determinants of Lepidopteran community composition and species diversity in eastern deciduous forests: roles of season, ecoregion and patch size. Oikos 100: 134-148. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11992.x
  25. Wilson, E.O. 1992. The diversity of life. Norton, New York.
  26. Yim, Y.J. and K.C. Yang. 1998. Vegetation changes Mt. Nam Park, Seoul. Kor. J. Ecol. 21: 589-602.

피인용 문헌

  1. Seasonal and Elevational Pattern of Herbivore’s Feeding Activity in Temperate Deciduous Forest. vol.47, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2014.47.1.024