일본 메이지기 [明治期] 문관대례복의 성립과 형태적 특징

Establishment of Western-style Court Dress and its Formal Characteristics in the Meiji Period of Japan

  • 투고 : 2010.01.25
  • 심사 : 2010.04.02
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30

초록

The purpose of the study is analyzing Japanese modern costume, through examining legislation process and the relics of Chickimkwan's and Juimkwan's court costume. The results of the study are as follows. First, the proposer of civil court costume, established in 1872, was Iwakura Mission dispatched to America and Europe. The Mission realized the importance of preparing western-style costume in civilization from experience wearing traditional clothing at ceremony of presenting credentials in America. Afterwards, the Mission proposed that the government accept western-style as civil court costume and became first wearers in Japanese in England. Second, the difference, between ordinance and actual clothes worn by Iwakura Mission, occurred in process of legislation in 1872. That might be considered as trial and error in introducing different culture. The coexistence of England and French styles was unified into French style by the revision of civil court costume in 1886. Third, the pattern of paulownia embroidered on civil court costume was utilized as symbol of Japan. While the costume of Chickimkwan was embroidered by the pattern of 7 and 5 leaves paulownia, that of Juimkwan was 5 and 3 leaves expressing their grades. Fourth, relics research showed how formed manufacturer information and enacted design were in embroidery. The relics seemed to be manufactured in Japan, because emblem of Mitsukosi tailor was embroidered on inner part of the back of collar of Chickimkwan in Nara Women's University, Japan and that of Yamasaki on left inner pocket of Juimkwan in the Independence Hall, Korea. The embroider techniques comprised forming by filler particles according to the design, filling up coiled gold threads and expressing stem with gold threads and spangles. As preemptive study, establishment process of Japanese civil court costume in this study will help understand form characteristics appeared in civil court costume act of Korean Empire.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 河鱸實英 (1959). 明治以降の禮服. 被服文化. 57
  2. 太田臨一郞 (1974). 明治初期の軍人. 官員の制服. 被服文化. 164
  3. 植木淑子 (1994). 明治初期における文官大禮服. 日本服飾學會誌 13
  4. 刑部芳則 (2002). 岩倉遺臨使節の文官大禮服について. 風俗史學. 19.
  5. 田中彰 (1977). 岩倉使節団. 동경: (주)講談社, p.18.
  6. 泉三郞 (2001). 堂々たる日本人. 東京: 祥伝社, p. 15.
  7. 久米邦武 編, 田中 彰校注 (1977). 特命全權大使 米歐回覽實, 전5권. 東京: 岩波書店.
  8. 이경미 (1999). 19세기 개항이후 한일 복식제도 비교. 서울대학교 석사학위논문, pp. 18-38
  9. 泉三郞 (2001). 堂々たる日本人. 東京: 祥伝社, p. 17.
  10. 田中彰 (2003). 明治維新と西洋文明-岩倉使節団は何を見たか. 東京: 岩波新書, p. 2.
  11. 梅谷知世 (2001). 幕末における洋行者の服飾. 服飾美學 32
  12. 梅谷知世 (2002). 明治前期における洋行者の服飾. 服飾美學, 34.
  13. 泉三郎 (2001). 堂々たる日本人. 東京: 祥伝社, p. 36
  14. 刑部芳則 (2002). 岩倉遺臨使節の文官大禮服について. 風俗史學, 19, pp. 53-55.
  15. 林董 저, 由井正臣 校注 (1979). 後は昔の記. 東京: 平凡社. p. 171.
  16. 林董 저, 由井正臣 校注 (1979). 後は昔の記. 東京: 平凡社. p. 181.
  17. 日本宮内廳編 (1968). 明治天皇紀, 2. 東京: 吉川弘文館, p.779.
  18. 泉三郎 (2001). 堂々たる日本人. 東京: 祥伝社, p. 93.
  19. 泉三郎 (2001). 堂々たる日本人. 東京: 祥伝社, p. 117.
  20. 毎日新聞 (1990). キヨッソーネと近世日本畫里歸り展. 東京: ブンュー社, p. 2l.
  21. 日本宮内廳編 (1968). 明治天皇紀, 2. 東京: 吉川弘文館, p. 153.
  22. 内閣官報局 (1872). 法令金書, 太政官, 339.
  23. 内客官報局. 法令金書. 明治5년, pp. 238-239
  24. 內閣官報局. 法令金書. 明治5년. p. 251(칙임관), p. 258(주임관), pp. 263-264(판임관), p. 265(등외).
  25. 日本宮內廳編 (1968). 明治天皇紀, 4, pp. 262-263.
  26. 丹波恒夫 (1966). 錦繪にみ明治天皇と明治時代. 東京: 韓日新聞社, p. 118.
  27. 內客官報局 (1872). 法令全書, 太政官 第373號披(明治5年 11月 29日)
  28. 허동현 편(1999). 朝士視察團關係資料集, 12. 서울: 국학자료원, pp. 12-13
  29. 內閣官報局 (1872). 法令全書. 太政官 第48號(明治6年 2月 13日)(布)
  30. 신문집성 명치편년사 편찬회(1934-1936). 新聞集成 明治編年史 1권. p. 393.
  31. 이경미 (1999). 19세기 개항이후 한일 복식제도 비교. 서울대학교 석사학위논문, pp. 38-46 참고.
  32. 奉勅宮內大臣 伯爵 伊藤博文. 內閣官報局 (1872). 法令全書. 明治19年 12月 4日 宮內省達第15號.
  33. 內閣官報局 (1872) 法令全書. 宮內省達第十六號
  34. 內閣官報局. 法令全書. 明治19年, pp. 247-249
  35. 內閣官報局. 法令全書. 明治19年, pp. 250-257.
  36. 岩崎雅美 외 (2004). 奈良女高師房の教員の服裝-大礼服と敎援服-. 奈良女子大學大學院 人間文化硏究科 學術硏究交流センタ一 活動 年報 Vol.5
  37. Valerie Steele (2005). Encyclopedia of Clothing and Fashion, 1, pp. 312-314.
  38. 佐野惠作 (1933) 皇室の御紋章. 東京: 三省堂, p. 99.