도시 하천(원주천) 유입이 섬강 하류 부착규조 군집에 미치는 영향

Effects of an Inflowing Urban Stream (Wonju stream) on Epilithic Diatom Assemblages in the Lower Seom River

  • Yoon, Sung-Ae (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Nan-Young (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Baik-Ho (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Hwang, Soon-Jin (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2010.05.18
  • 심사 : 2010.06.10
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30

초록

섬강 수계로 유입되는 도시하천(원주천)의 유입이 부착조류 군집에 미치는 생태학적 영향을 평가하기 위하여 부착조류 및 수질조사를 실시하였다. 조사는 섬강 본류와 원주천을 포함한 지류 등 총 14개 지점을 선정하여 2007년 10월에서 2008년 9월에까지 계절별로 4회에 걸쳐 실시하였다. 조사결과, 수온과 용존산소를 제외한 대부분의 수질항목은 계절 변이가 크지 않았고, 섬강 상류에서 가장 낮은 농도를 보였으며, 섬강 중류(원주천 유입부분)에서 가장 높은 농도를 보였고, 원주천 합류 이후 하류로 갈수록 점차 농도가 감소하였다. 조사기간 동안 가장 높은 빈도와 생물량을 보인 종은 Achnanthes convergens이었고, 원주천를 비롯하여 수질오염이 심한 지점에서는 Navicula goeppertiana, Navicula subminuscula, Nitzschia palea 등이 높은 밀도를 보였다. 각 조사지점의 TDI(trophic diatom index)에 의하면, 섬강 수계는 크게 3 그룹 - 섬강 상류와 지류하천(A 또는 B등급), 원주천(D등급), 합류후 섬강하류의 본류(C등급)로 구분되었으며, 대부분의 수질과 높은 상관성을 보였다. 생물 및 수질요인을 근거로 하는 유사도 분석결과는 TDI 지수의 분포와 유사하였다. 따라서, 인구밀집과 공업단지를 관통하는 원주천은 섬강 수계에 서식하는 부착규조 및 수질에 큰 영향을 미치며, 원주천 합류 이후 하류로 갈수록 오염정도가 점차 감소하는 것으로 평가되었다.

Epilithic diatom communities and water quality were monitored to evaluate the ecological impact of the inflow of Wonju-stream passing through the urban area in the Seom River Watershed. We selected the 14 sampling stations (5 main stream sites and 9 tributary sites), and collected diatom and water samples between October 2007 and September 2008, on the seasonal basis. The results indicate that most water quality parameters showed the site-specific patterns over the study, except for water temperature and dissolved oxygen. The levels of water quality parameters were highest at the site of Wonju stream, whereas the lowest in the upstream sites, and intermediate or gradually decreased in the downstream sites of the Seom river. One species, Achnanthes convergens, showed the highest biomass and frequency over the sites, while three saprophilous species-Navicula goeppertiana, Navicula subminuscula, Nitzschia palea were appeared only in Wonju Stream and other polluted sites. According to trophic diatom index (TDI) values, which were highly correlated with nutrients and EC, the study sites were classified into three classes: upstream and tributary (Class A and B), Wonju Stream (Class D), and mixed zone and downstream (Class C). A cluster analysis supported the result of TDI classification. Therefore, Wonju-stream located in populated urban area exerted the adverse ecological effects on the epilithic diatom community and water quality of the lower Seom River System, although its severity gradually decreased downstream.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김기동. 2003. 원주천과 섬강 수계의 내분비계 장애물질 분석. 한국환경분석학회지 6: 1-5.
  2. 김기동, 서정범, 서용찬. 2007. 섬강, 원주천, 매지천 그리고 주요 유입지천의 수질조사. 한국환경분석학회지 10: 191-196.
  3. 김백호, 박영석, 김용재. 2010. 동화습지의 갈대 침수줄기에 서식하는 부착규조군집의 생태학적 특성. 한국하천호수학회지 43: 91-102.
  4. 김용재. 2001. 신천의 부착규조 군집과 유기오탁 판정. 한국육수학회지 34: 199-205.
  5. 김용재. 2007. 도시화 정도에 따른 포천천과 영평천의 돌 부착규조 군집 변화. 한국육수학회지 40: 468-480.
  6. 김용재. 2009. 시화 반월 고습지와 저습지의 갈대 부착규조 군집 구조. 한국하천호수학회지 42: 95-106.
  7. 김용진, 이옥민. 2009. 부착규조류를 이용한 달천과 섬강의 생물학적 수질평가. 한국물환경학회지 25: 606-614.
  8. 신현선, 박승철, 김재구, 김숙정, 박정호, 최재석, 최준길. 2006. 원주천 수서곤충의 섭식기능군을 이용한 군집분석. 한국환경생태학회지 20: 259-266.
  9. 안광국, 김자현, 배대열, 이재연. 2005. 해부학적 건강성 기법 및 생물학적 다변수 모델평가 기법을 이용한 하천 평가. 대한상수도학회 추계 학술 발표대회 논문집. pp. 1-5.
  10. 원두희, 전영철, 권순직, 황순진, 안광국, 이재관. 2006. 저서성 대형무척추동물을 이용한 한국오수생물지수의 개발과 생물학적 하천환경평가 적용. 한국물환경학회지 22: 768-783.
  11. 윤성애, 김난영, 변명섭, 김백호, 황순진. 2009. 섬강수계 부착규조의 유입능 특성: 자연기질과 인공기질의 비교. 한국하천호수학회지 42: 124-133.
  12. 이정호. 1998. 낙동강의 부착규조와 유기오탁지수(DAIpo). 한국육수학회지 31: 38-44.
  13. 허인량, 오근찬, 최지용. 1998. 섬강유역 환경용량 및 수질 Modeling. 한국환경위생학회지 24: 80-86.
  14. 한강수계관리위원회∙국립환경과학원. 2008a. 수생태 건강성 조사 및 평가. 총괄 분야.
  15. 환경부. 1997. 수질오염공정시험법, 동화기술.
  16. 환경부. 1989. 물환경관리기본계획(안).
  17. 환경부. 2004. 물환경관리기본계획(안).
  18. 환경부. 2010. 환경정책기본법시행령 별표 1, 제3호.
  19. 환경부.국립환경과학원. 2007. 수생태 건강성 조사 및 평가. 최종보고서.
  20. 환경부.국립환경과학원. 2008b. 수생태 건강성 조사 및 평가. 최종보고서.
  21. 환경부.국립환경과학원. 2009. 수생태 건강성 조사 및 평가. 최종보고서.
  22. 황순진, 김난영, 원두희, 안광국, 이재관, 김창수. 2006. 돌말(Epilithic Diatom) 지수를 이용한 국내 주요 하천(금강, 영산강, 섬진강)의 생물학적 수질평가. 한국물환경학회지 22: 784-795.
  23. Allan, J.D. 1995. Stream Ecology - Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman and hall, Netherlands.
  24. APHA. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
  25. Argent, D.G. and R.F. Carline. 2004. Fish assemblage changes in relation to watershed land use disturbance. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society 7: 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980490281407
  26. Asai, K. and T. Watanabe. 1995. Statistic classificaiton of epilithic diatom species into three ecological groups relating to organic water pollution. Diatom 10: 35-47.
  27. Brahim, F., L. Mohamed, O. Said, S. Brahim and C. Mohamed. 2002. Impact of wastewater effluent on the diatom assemblages structure of a brackish small stream: Oued Hassar (Morocco). Journal of Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 32: 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0075-9511(02)80017-2
  28. Descy, J.P. and M. Coste. 1991. A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Journal of Verhandlungen IVTLAP 24: 2112-2116.
  29. EEA. 1996. Surface water quality monitoring, Topic report No. 2. European Envoronment Agency.
  30. Evelyn, G. 2009. Periphyton as an indicator of restoration in the Florida Everglades. Journal of Ecological Indicators 9: 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.08.004
  31. Ewe, S.M.L., E.E. Gaiser, D.L. Childers, V.H. Rivera-Monroy, D. Iwaniec, J. Fourquerean and R.R. Twiley. 2006. Spatial and temporal patterns of above ground net primary productivity (ANPP) in the Florida Coastal Everglades LTER (2001-2004). Journal of Hydrobiologia 569: 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0149-5
  32. Grimm, N.B., J.M. Grove, S.T.A. Pickett and C.L. Redman. 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Journal of BioSciences 50: 571-584. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
  33. Haper, D.M. and W.D.P. Stewat. 1987. The effects of land use upon water chemistry, particularly nutrient enrichment, in shallow lowland lakes; comparative studies of three lochs in Scotland. Journal of Hydrobiologia 148: 211-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017525
  34. Hofmann, G. 1994. Aufwuchs-Diatomeen in Seen und ihre Eignung als indikatoren der Trophie. Bibliotheca Diatomologica, Stuttgart, Germany.
  35. Horner, R.R. and E.B. Welch. 1981. Stream periphyton development in relation to current velocity and nutrients. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38: 449-457. https://doi.org/10.1139/f81-062
  36. Kelly, M.G. and B.A. Whitton. 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology 7: 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003802
  37. Kelly, M.G., C.J. Penny and B.A. Whitton. 1995. Comparative performance of benthic diatom indices used to assess river quality. Journal of Hydrobiologia 302: 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032108
  38. Kim, N., I. Thomas and P. Murphy. 2009. Assessment of Eutrophication and Phytoplankton Community Impairment in the Buffalo River Area of Concern. Journal of Great Lakes Research 35: 83-93.
  39. Krammer, K. and H. Lange-Bertalot. 2007a. Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Band 2/1: Bacillariophyceae 1.Teil: Naviculaceae (Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig and D. Mollenhauer, eds.). Elsevier Book Co., Germany.
  40. Krammer, K. and H. Lange-Bertalot. 2007b. Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Band 2/2: Bacillariophyceae 2.Teil:Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae (Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig and D. Mollenhauer, eds.). Elsevier Book Co., Germany.
  41. Krammer, K. and H. Lange-Bertalot. 2007c. Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Band 2/3: Bacillariophyceae 3.Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae (Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig and D. Mollenhauer, eds.). Elsevier Book Co., Germany.
  42. Krammer, K. and H. Lange-Bertalot. 2007d. Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Band 2/4: Bacillariophyceae 1.Teil: Achnanthaceae, Kritische Erganzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis (Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig and D. Mollenhauer, eds.). Elsevier Book Co., Germany.
  43. Liboriussen, L., E. Jeppesen, M.E. Bramm and M.F. Lassen. 2005. Periphyton-macroinvertebrate interactions in light and fish manipulated enclosures in a clear and a turbid shallow lake. Journal of Aquatic Ecology 39: 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-004-3039-9
  44. Maarten, D.J., B.V. Vijverb, R. Blusta and L. Bervoets. 2008. Responses of aquatic organisms to metal pollution in a lowland river in Flanders: A comparison of diatoms and macroinvertebrates. Journal Science of the Total Environment 407: 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.020
  45. Maria, J.F., S.F.P. Almeida, S.C. Craveiro and A.J. Calado. 2009. A comparison between biotic indices and predictive models in stream water quality assessment based on benthic diatom communities. Journal of Ecological Indicators 9: 497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.07.001
  46. McCormick, P.V. and R.J. Stevenson. 1998. Periphyton as a tool for ecological assessment and management in the florida everglades. Journal of Phycology 34: 726-733. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340726.x
  47. Ometo, J.P.H.B., L.A. Martinelli, M.V. Ballester, A. Gessner, A.V. Krrusche, R.L. Victoria and M. Williams. 2000. Effects of land use on water chemistry and macroinvertebrates in two streams of the Piracicaba River basin, southeast Brazil. Journal of Freshwater Biology 44: 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00557.x
  48. Patrick, R. and C.W. Reimer. 1966. The diatoms of the United States, exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii. Volum 1: Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae, Achnanthaceae, Naviculaceae. Academy of natural sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
  49. Reynolds, C.S. 2006. The Ecology of Phytoplankton. Cambridge University press. UK.
  50. Riley, S.P.D., G.T. Busteed, L.B. Kats, T.L. Vandergon, L.F.S. Lee, R.G. Dagit, J.L. Kerby, R.N. Fisher and R.M. Sauvajot. 2005. Effects of urbanization on the distribution and abundance of amphibians and invasive species in southern California streams. Journal of Conservation Biology 19: 1894-1907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00295.x
  51. Stevenson, R.J., C.G. Peterson and D.B. Kirschtel. 1991. Density-dependent growth, ecological strategies, and effects of nutrients and shading on benthic diatom succession in streams. Journal of Phycology 27: 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1991.00059.x
  52. USEPA. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols For Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton. 2nd eds. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., USA.
  53. USEPA. 2002. Biological Assessments and Criteria, EPA 822-F-02-006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., USA.
  54. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, office of water, Washington, D.C., USA.
  55. Van Nieuwenhuyse, E.E. and J.R. Jones. 1966. Phosphoruschlorophyll relationship in temperate streams and its variation with stream catchment area. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 99-105.
  56. Walter, K.D. 2002. Freshwater Ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
  57. Walter, R.H. 1996. Factors affecting benthic algae. In: Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems (Stevenson, R.J., M.L. Bothwell and R.L. Lowe, eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, California.
  58. Watanabe, T., K. Asai and A. Houki. 1986. Numerical estimation of organic pollution of flowing water by using the epilithic diatom assemblage-Diatom Assemblage Index (DAIpo). Journal Science of the Total Environment 55: 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(86)90180-4
  59. Watanabe, T. and K. Asai. 1990. Numerical simulation using diatom assemblage of organic pollution in stream and lakes. The Review of Inquiry and Research 52: 99-139.