Effects of Planting Dates and Mulch Types on the Growth, Yield and Chemical Properties of Waxy Corn Crosses $Sonjajang{\times}KNU-7$ and $Asan{\times}KNU-7$

  • Souvandouane, Souliya (Division of Applied Plant Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Esguerra, Manuel (Division of Applied Plant Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Heo, Kyu-Hong (Division of Applied Plant Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Rico, Cyren M. (Division of Applied Plant Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Chul (Division of Applied Plant Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2009.04.13
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

The growth, yield and chemical properties of waxy corn $Sonjajang{\times}KNU-7$ and $Asan{\times}KNU-7$ planted in different dates and mulch types in a converted paddy field was investigated. Experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design in a split split-plot arrangement with four replications. Planting dates (D) [May 16 (D1, early), June 1 (D2, middle), June 6 (D3, late)] represented main plots, plastic mulch (M) [(BM, black mulch; TM, transparent mulch)] for subplots while waxy corn crosses [$Sonjajang{\times}KNU-7$ (‘Sonja’) and $Asan{\times}KNU-7$ (‘Asan’)] for sub-subplots. Results showed that D had a significant effect on growth characters except emergence, ear quality except ear diameter, and yield whereas M showed significant effect on growth characters only. Superior growth and ear quality performance were recorded in D1 and BM. In terms of crosses, ‘Sonja’ had better growth performance than ‘Asan’ regardless of D and M, but performed better at D1 and BM. Highest yield was obtained in D1 for BM (2,131 kg $10a^{-1}$) and TM (1,655 kg $10a^{-1}$) but no significant difference in the yield across V was recorded. In terms of starch and sugar contents, a decreasing trend was observed from D1 to D3 regardless of M and V.

Keywords

References

  1. Armstrong, W. 1978. The effect of drainage treatments on cereal yield: results from experiments on clay lands. J. Agric. Sci. 91:229-235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960005680X
  2. Dale, A.E. and D.S.H. Drennan. 1997. Transplanted maize (Zea mays) for grain production in southern England. I. Effects of planting date, transplant age at planting and cultivar on grain yield. The J. Agric. Sci 128 : 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859696003875
  3. asson, D.L. and W. Fearnehough. 2000. Effect of plastic much, planting date and cultivar on the yield and maturity of forage maize grown under marginal climatic condition in Northern Ireland. Grass Forage Sci. 55: 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00218.x
  4. Eun, J.H., C.M. Rico, M.K. Kim, S. Souvandouane, T.K. Son, D.I. Shin, K.I. Chung and S.C. Lee. 2007. Yield performance and nutritional quality of 'Agakong' soybean harvested in drained-paddy and upland fields. Kor. J. Plant Res. 20(3) : 258-262.
  5. Felcyzynski, K. 1994. Plant and soil covers in direct seeded and transplanted sweet corn. Acta Hort. 371 : 317-319.
  6. Gilby, G.W. 1990. Specialty horticultural films, based on polyethylenes, for greater control of the growing environment. Proc. XI International Congress on 'The use of plastics in agriculture'. New Delhi, India.
  7. Hanras, J.C.H. 1979. Agricultural and horticultural uses for photodegrable polyethylene (LDPE) films. Plastic Culture 41 : 43-58.
  8. Keane, G.P., J. Kelly, S. Lordan and K. Kelly. 2003. Agronomic factors affecting the yield and quality of forage maize in Ireland: Effect of plastic film system and seedling rate. Grass Forage Sci. 58 : 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2003.00389.x
  9. Kim, I.H., S.K. Kim and S.C. Lee. 2001. Growth characters and sugar content during grain filling in new hybrid, Chalok1/ Cooktail 51 corn. Kor. J. Crop Sci. 46(2) : 69-77.
  10. Kim, S.L., K.Y. Park, Y.H. Lee and H.R. Yong. 2004. Seed quality of soybean produced from upland and drained-paddy field. Kor. J. Crop Sci. 49(4) : 309-315.
  11. Kleinhenz, V., W.H. Schnitzler and D.J. Midmore. 1996. Diversification and transformation of Asian paddy rice fields to upland vegetable production. Entwicklung und Landlicher Raum 3 : 23-26.
  12. Kwabiah, A.B. 2004. Growth and yield of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars in response to planting date and plastic mulch in a short-season environment. Sci. Hort. 102 : 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.01.007
  13. Madsen, M.B. 1992. Mulching of Maize with plastic. Tidssskrift for Planteavl 96 : 343-351.
  14. Nakui, T., K. Nonaka, S. Hara and M. Shinoda. 1995. The effect of plastic mulch on the growth of corn plants and their TDN yield of silage in the Tokachi district. Res. Bull. Hokkaido Nat'l. Agric. Exp. Stn. 161 : 73-80.
  15. Olsen, J.K., G.W. Blight and D. Gillespie. 1990. Comparison of yield, cob characteristics and sensory quality of six supersweet (sh2) corn cultivars grown in a subtropical environment. Australian J. Experimental Agri. 30(3) : 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9900387
  16. Park, J.P. 2001. Corn production in Asia. Food and fertilizer technology center for Asian and Pacific region. p. 206.
  17. Phipps, R.H. 1994. Protected maize: benefits. Farmer weekly, 120 (7), Quality Forage Suppl., 20-21.
  18. Robinson, M. 2008. Mulches – Alternatives to peat and their use. Conference on peat alternatives. Belfast
  19. Takahashi, T. and Toriyama, K. 2004. Method to evaluate 'Uplandization' in converted field from a paddy based on crystallinity of free iron oxides. Japan Agric. Res. Quart. 38(3) : 155-159. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.38.155
  20. Van der Werf, H.M.G. 1993. The effect of plastic mulch and greenhouse raised seedling on yield of maize. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 170 : 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1993.tb01084.x