Comparison of Mechanical and Enzymatic Methods for the Isolation of Bovine Ovarian Follicles

  • Lim, Hyun-Joo (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Hoon (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Im, Gi-Sun (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lim, Jeong-Mook (Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Food Biotechnology, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2010.04.13
  • 심사 : 2010.04.28
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30

초록

The isolation of preantral follicles from the ovaries of bovine was performed under mechanical and enzymatic methods. A significant increase in the total number of follicles retrieved was detected when tissue chopper was used. Micro-dissection could supply good quality, larger sized follicles (400 to $700{\mu}m$) but with the lowest yield ($9.0{\pm}1.0$). The isolated preantral and early antral follicles were cultured for 14 days. Follicles isolated by the mechanical method had a greater growth during a culture period than follicles collected enzymatically. Morphologically normal bovine oocytes from early antral follicles after 14 days culture were 59.6% after culture and after 24 h of maturation culture, 12.9% of in vitro-grown oocytes reached the second metaphase. In conclusion, this study showed that mechanical method can be used effectively to isolate intact preantral follicles from bovine ovaries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Eppig JJ and O'Brien MJ. 1996. Development in vitro of mouse oocytes from primordial follicles. Biol. Reprod. 54:197-207. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod54.1.197
  2. Eppig JJ, Schroeder AC. 1989. Capacity of mouse oocytes from preantral follicles to undergo embryogenesis and development to live young after growth, maturation, and fertilization in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 41 :268-276. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod41.2.268
  3. Erickson BH. 1966. Development and senescence of the postnatal bovine ovary. J. Anim. Sci. 25:800-805.
  4. Figueiredo JR, Hulshof SCJ, Hurk R. van den, Ectors FJ, Fontes RS, Nusgens, B, Bevers MM and Beckers JF. 1993. Development of a combined new mechanical and enzymatic method for the isolation of intact preantral follicles from fetal, calf and adult bovine ovaries. Theriogenology 40: 789-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90214-P
  5. Greenwald GS and Moor RM. 1989. Isolation and preliminary characterization of pig primordial follicles. J. Reprod. Fertil. 87:561-571. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0870561
  6. Lucci CM, Rumpf R, Figueiredo JR and Bao SN. 2002. Zebu (Bos indicus) ovarian preantral follicles: Morphological characterization and development of an efficient isolation method. Theriogenology 57:1467-1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00641-6
  7. Nayudu PL and Osborn SM. 1992. Factors influencing the rate of preantral and antral growth of mouse ovarian follicles in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 95:349-362. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0950349
  8. Roy SK and Greenwald GS. 1989. Hormonal requirements for the growth and differentiation of hamster preantral follicles in long-term culture. J. Reprod. Fertil. 87:103-114. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0870103
  9. Saumande J. 1981. Ovogenese et folliculogenese, Rec. Med. Vet. 157:29-38.
  10. Torrance C, Telfer E and Gosden RG. 1989. Quantitative study of the development of isolated mouse pre-antral follicles in collagen gel culture. J. Reprod. Fertil. 87:367-374. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0870367
  11. Van den H, Bevers MM and Beckers JF. 1997. In vivo and in vitro development of preantral follicles. Theriogenology 47: 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(96)00341-X