The Review on Physical Therapy Curriculum in South Korea

우리나라 물리치료 교육과정에 대한 고찰

  • Goo, Bong-Oh (Department of Physical Therapy, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Park, Min-Chull (Department of Physical Therapy, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Myoung-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu Health College) ;
  • Song, You-Ik (Department of Physical Therapy, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Cho, Ye-Rim (Department of Physical Therapy, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • 구봉오 (부산가톨릭대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 박민철 (부산대학교병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 이명희 (대구보건대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 송유익 (부산가톨릭대학교 생명과학대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 조예림 (부산가톨릭대학교 생명과학대학원 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2010.03.10
  • Accepted : 2010.05.12
  • Published : 2010.05.31

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to investigate curriculums of physical therapy education. Methods : We identified the curriculums of physical therapy education by internet. Results : In Korea, education on physical therapy started as a two-year program in 1963, and recently reorganized as three or four years programs. Currently some ten schools offer physical therapy programs for master's and doctor's degrees. The member countries of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy (WCPT) provide approximately ten types of education programs that take two to six years. In Korea, the same programs have three or four years of education periods. The American Physical Therapist Association (APTA) launched on the doctor of physical therapy (DPT) course in the late 1990s, encouraging physical therapists to acquire a doctorate degree. In addition, the U.S. Vision 2020 envisions that all physical therapists acquire DPT by the year 2020. As the medical field becomes more professional and specialized, physical therapists are expected to supplement and even replace works of doctors, instead of merely assisting them. It is necessary to reinforce education programs and improve related school systems to enhance status of physical therapist in accordance with the changing social needs and to provide quality service to patients. Conclusion : We suggest to change the curriculum of Korea. It is more accurately reflected the scope, depth, breadth, and rigor of the high-quality education preparation needed for current and future practice.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경, 박은세, 조용호 등. 한국 물리치료 과정의 표준교과 개발에 대한 연구. 대한물리치료학회지. 2006;18(6):23-32.
  2. 김은주, 남재만, 이승민 등. 물리치료학과 교육과정 연구. 대한물리치료학회지. 1998;10(1):241-51
  3. 대한물리치료사협회 (http://www.kpta.ac.kr/)
  4. 미국물리치료사협회 (http://www.apta.org/)
  5. 박재용. 한국 물리치료의 현황과 발전방향. KPTA NEWS. 2008;137호
  6. 배성수, 박래준. 한국 물리치료의 현황과 진로. 대한 물리치료학회지. 1998;10(1):223-7.
  7. 세계물리치료사연맹 (http://www.wcpt.org/)
  8. 위키백과 (http://ko.wikipedia.org/)
  9. Wilcox KC & Weber MA Factors influencing applicant selection of entry-level physical therapist education programs in the United States. J Allied Health. 2005;34(1):11-6.