DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A FULLY EMPIRICAL APPROACH TO GALAXY EVOLUTION

  • Received : 2010.07.01
  • Accepted : 2010.08.19
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

Observations of large samples of galaxies from low to high redshifts are composing a picture of remarkable simplicity: (1) The star formation rate (SFR) of starforming galaxies scales almost linearly with mass, strongly decline with cosmic time, and exhibits very small scatter around the average relation. (2) Due to the high observed SFRs the mass of galaxies at high redshifts must increase very rapidly, and yet the mass function of star forming galaxies evolves only very slightly with redshift. (3) At all redshifts the fraction of quenched (passively evolving) galaxies increases with galactic stellar mass and with local overdensity, with the remarkable property that the relative efficiency of "mass quenching" is independent of environment, and that of "environment quenching" is independent of mass. In a recent paper by the zCOSMOS collaboration, Peng et al. (2010) demonstrate that these three empirical facts suffice to account for the observed evolution of the galaxy mass function and naturally generate the "double-Schechter" mass function for quenched galaxies.

Keywords

References

  1. Brinchmann, J., et al., 2004, The Physical Properties of Star-Forming Galaxies in the Low-Redshift Universe, MNRAS, 351, 1151 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x
  2. Daddi, E., et al., 2007, Multiwavelength Study of Massive Galaxies at z - 2. I. Star Formation and Galaxy Growth, ApJ, 670, 156 https://doi.org/10.1086/521818
  3. Elbaz, D., et al., 2007, The Reversal of the Star Formation-Density Relation in the Distant Universe, A&A, 468, 33 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077525
  4. Gonzalez, V., et al., 2010, The Stellar Mass Density and Specific Star Formation Rate of the Universe at z - 7, ApJ, 713, 115 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/713/1/115
  5. Ilbert, O., et al., 2010, Galaxy Stellar Mass Assembly between 0.2 < z < 2 from the S-COSMOS Survey, ApJ, 709, 644 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/644
  6. Lilly, S. J., et al., 2009, The zCOSMOS 10k-Bright Spectroscopic Sample, ApJS, 184, 218 https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/184/2/218
  7. Noeske, K. G., et al., 2007, Star Formation in AEGIS Field Galaxies Since z = 1.1: The Dominance of Gradually Declining Star Formation, and the Main Sequence of Star-Forming Galaxies, ApJ, 660, L43 https://doi.org/10.1086/517926
  8. Pannella, M., et al., 2009, Star Formation and Dust Obscuration at z - 2: Galaxies at the Dawn of Downsizing, ApJ, 698, L116 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/L116
  9. Peng, Y., et al., 2010, Mass and Environment as Drivers of Galaxy Evolution in SDSS and zCOSMOS and the Origin of the Schechter Function, ApJ, 721, 193 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193
  10. Pozzetti, L., et al., 2009, zCOSMOS - 10k-Bright Spectroscopic Sample. The Bimodality in the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function: Exploring Its Evolution with Redshift, A&A, submitted, arXiv:0907.5416
  11. Renzini, A., 2009, A Different Approach to Galaxy Evolution, MNRAS, 398, L58 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00710.x