한국유기농업학회지 (Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture)

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.113-134
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1229-3571(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-819X(eISSN)
한국유기농업학회 (Korean Association of Organic Agriculture)
권호 표지

친환경농업 채택에 영향을 미치는 요인 -전남지역 시설채소 재배농가를 중심으로-

Factors Influencing the Adoption of Environment-Friendly Agriculture -With Emphasis on Greenhouse Vegetable Growers of Jeonnam-

  • 김선애 (순천대학교 농업과학연구소) ;
  • 이기웅 (순천대학교 생명산업과학대학 농업경제학과)
  • 투고 : 2010.06.01
  • 심사 : 2010.06.21
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of the study is to investigate factors influencing the adoption of environment-friendly agriculture in greenhouse vegetable production of Jeonnam province. An interview survey were conducted during 2008, including six counties: Gwansanku of Gwangju, Gwangyang, Goheung, Damyang, Boseong, and Suncheon. Major crops grown in surveyed area were green peppers, cucumbers, strawberries, cherry tomatoes, tomatoes, and watermelons. Logit model results show that adopters of environment-friendly agriculture are more likely to participate in extensional education programs, attend educational programs on environment-friendly agriculture, have greater cultivated acreage, and have larger agriculture-only-designated farmland. However the adopters are less likely to have greater number of family members participating in farming, and live Goheung county. Efforts should be made in extensional education programs to lead more vegetable growers to adopt environment-friendly agriculture. Policy makers' additional efforts should be followed to increase adoption rate of environment-friendly agriculture in lower adopted areas.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국학술진흥재단

참고문헌

  1. 강창용.박현태. 2005. 친환경 쌀 생산의 효율성 분석. 농촌경제 28(4): 19-40.
  2. 강창용.고욱. 2005. 친환경 농산물에 대한 소비자 인식과 태도. 연구자료 제26권 한국 농촌경제연구원.
  3. 김상오.김민희.심재한, 2008. 소비자의 친환경농산물 인식 및 구매행동에 대한 이해. 한국유기농업학회지 16(1): 21-42.
  4. 김성숙.이승신. 2000. 상품 안전성정보에 관한 소비자 행동연구. 소비자학연구 11(3): 59-85.
  5. 김창길. 2005. 미래농업 성장 동력원 친환경농업 발전방향. 친환경 생명식품 생산과 유통 판매 전략에 관한 심포지엄, 전라남도 농업기술원, 광주.전남농업발전연구회.
  6. 김창길.김태영.서성천. 2005. 친환경 농산물에 대한 소비자 선호와 구매행태 분석. 한국농촌경제연구원 R500.
  7. 김창길.김태영.신용광.강창용.허장.노기안.최지용.한대호. 2004. 친환경농업체제로 의 전환을 위한 전략과 추진 방안. 한국농촌경제연구원 R 469.
  8. 김태균.김충실. 1993. 유기농산물에 대한 수요분석. 농업경영. 정책연구 20(2): 83-104.
  9. 신용광.김창길.김태영.주진호. 2005. 고랭지농업의 환경친화적 재편을 위한 기초연구. 한국농촌경제연구원 R 517.
  10. 윤석원.박영복. 2000. 유기농산물 소비실태 및 소비자 분석. 한국유기농업학회지 8:35-42.
  11. 이성우.조중구.임형백. 2004. 친환경농업의 결정요인과 지역간 차이. 농촌경제 27(1): 41-61.
  12. 전태갑.송문갑. 2002. 친환경농업 육성방안 연구. 전남대학교.
  13. 허덕.임성진. 2005. 친환경 축산 직불제 시범사업 실태분석. 농촌경제 28(2): 85-99.
  14. Bosch, D. J., Z. L. Cook, and K. O. Fuglie. 1995. Voluntary versus mandatory agricultural policies to protect water quality: Adoption of nitrogen testing in Neberaska. Review of Agricultural Economics 17: 13-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1349651
  15. Dorfman, J. H. 1996. Modeling multiple adoption decisions on a joint framework. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 547-557. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243273
  16. Ervin C. A., and D. E. Ervin. 1982. Factors affecting the use of soil conservation practices: hypotheses, evidence, and policy implications. Land Economics 58: 277-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/3145937
  17. Fernandez-Cornejo, J., E. D. Beach, and Wen-Yuan Huang. 1994. The adoption of IPM techniques by vegetable growers in Florida, Michigan and Texas. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26: 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800019271
  18. Gillespie, J. M., S. Kim, and K. Paudel. 2007. Why don't producers adopt best management practices?: An analysis of the beef cattle industry. Agricultural Economics 36: 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00179.x
  19. Gould, B. W., W. E. Saupe, and R. M. Klemme. 1989. Conservation tillage: The role of farm and operator characteristics and the perception of soil erosion. Land Economics 65: 167-182. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146791
  20. Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  21. Kim, S., J. M. Gillespie, and K. P. Paudel. 2005. The effect of socioeconomic factors on the adoption of best management practices in beef cattle production. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60: 111-120.
  22. Kim, S., J. M. Gilespie, and K. P. Paudel. 2008. Rotational grazing adoption in cattle production under a cost-share agreement: Does ambivalence have a role in conservation technology adoption? Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52: 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00434.x
  23. Koseling, M., O. Falten, and G. Lien. 2008. Factors influencing the conversion to organic farming in Norway. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7: 78-95 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2008.016981
  24. Kurkalova, L., C. Kling, and J. Zhao. 2001. Real options vs risk aversion in the adoption of conservation tillage: The revealed premium for adopting conservation tillage. American Agricultural Economics Association annual meeting. Chicago, Illinois.
  25. Lee, L. K., and W. H. Stewart. 1983. Landownership and the adoption of minimum tillage. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65: 256-264. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240871
  26. Rahm, M. R. and W. D. Huffman. 1984. The adoption of reduced tillage: The role of human capital and other variables. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 405-413. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240918
  27. SarKer, Md. A. and Y. Itohara. 2008. Factors influencing the extent of practice of organic farming Technologies: A case study of Tangail district in Bangladesh. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3: 584-590. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2008.584.590
  28. Soule, M. J., A. Tegene, and K. D. Wiebe. 2000. Land tenure and the adoption of conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 993-1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00097
  29. Wu, J., and B. A. Babcock. 1998. The choice of tillage, rotation, and soil testing practices: Economic and environmental Implications. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 494-511. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244552