Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

COMPARISON OF SCREW-IN EFFECT FOR SEVERAL NICKEL-TITANIUM ROTARY INSTRUMENTS IN SIMULATED RESIN ROOT CANAL

모형 레진 근관에서 수종의 전동 니켈-티타늄 파일에 대한 screw-in effect 비교

  • Ha, Jung-Hong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jin, Myoung-Uk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Kyo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 하정홍 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 진명욱 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김영경 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김성교 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Received : 2010.05.06
  • Accepted : 2010.06.29
  • Published : 2010.07.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Screw-in effect is one of the unintended phenomena that occurs during the root canal preparation with nickel-titanium rotary files. The aim of this study was to compare the screw-in effect among various nickel-titanium rotary file systems. Six different nickel-titanium rotary instruments (ISO 20/.06 taper) were used: $K3^{TM}$ (SybronEndo, Glendora, CA, USA), $M_{two}$ (VDW GmbH, Munchen, Germany), NRT with safe-tip and with active tip (Mani Inc., Shioya-gun, Japan), ProFile$^{(R)}$ (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and ProTaper$^{(R)}$ (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). For ProTaper$^{(R)}$, S2 was selected because it has size 20. Root canal instrumentations were done in sixty simulated single-curved resin root canals with a rotational speed of 300 rpm and single pecking motion. A special device was designed to measure the force of screw-in effect. A dynamometer of the device recorded the screw-in force during simulated canal preparation and the recorded data was stored in a computer with designed software (LCV-USE-VS, Lorenz Messtechnik GmbH, Alfdorf, Germany). The data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple range test for post-hoc test. P value of less than 0.05 was regarded significant. ProTaper$^{(R)}$ produced significantly more screw-in effects than any other instruments in the study (p < 0.001). $K3^{TM}$ produced significantly more screw-in effects than $M_{two}$, and ProFile$^{(R)}$ (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference among $M_{two}$, NRT, and ProFile$^{(R)}$ (p > 0.05), and between NRT with active tip and NRT with safe one neither (p > 0.05). From the result of the present study, it was concluded, therefore, that there seems significant differences of screw-in effect among the tested nickel-titanium rotary instruments. The radial lands and rake angle of nickel-titanium rotary instrument might be the cause of the difference.

Screw-in effect는 니켈-티타늄 전동 파일을 사용한 근관형성시 나타나는 현상으로 근관형성을 어렵게 한다. 이 연구의 목적은 다양한 니켈-티타늄 전동 파일들 사이의 screw-in effect를 비교하고자 하는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 여섯 가지의 다른 니켈-티타늄 전동 파일 기구들, 즉, $K3^{TM}$ (SybronEndo, Glendora, CA USA), $M_{two}$(VDW GmbH, Munchen, Germany), 삭제능이 있는 첨단을 가진 것과 삭제능이 없는 첨단을 가진 NRT (Mani Inc., Shioya-gun, Japan), ProFile$^{(R)}$ (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), 그리고 ProTaper$^{(R)}$ (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)가 사용되었다. 기구가 동일한 경사도와 크기를 가지게 하기 위해, 각 기구는 경사도 0.06, size 20을 선택하였으며, ProTaper$^{(R)}$의 경우에는 이와 유사한 S2를 사용하였다. 각 기구당 10개씩 총 60개의 투명레진 블록의 모조 단일 만곡근관(REF A0177, Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaiguez, Switzerland)에서, 전동파일의 회전속도는 분당 300회전으로 하고, 단일 pecking 동작이 되게 하여 기구조작을 하였다. 장치를 고안하여 일정한 힘의 pecking 동작을 재현하고 screw-in effect의 힘을 측정하였다. 고안한 장치의 dynamometer가 근관형성 과정동안 screw-in force를 측정하였고, 기록된 data는 고안된 소프트웨어를 이용하여 컴퓨터에 저장되었다. 데이터는 one-way ANOVA로 통계처리를 하였고, Tukey's multiple range test를 사용하여 95% 수준에서 유의성을 검정하였다. ProTaper$^{(R)}$가 가장 큰 screw-in effect를 나타내었다(p < 0.001). $K3^{TM}$는 $M_{two}$와 ProFile$^{(R)}$ 보다 큰 screw-in effect를 나타내었다(p < 0.001). 그러나 $M_{two}$, NRT와 ProFile$^{(R)}$ 사이에서는 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았고(p > 0.05), 삭제능이 있는 첨단을 가진 NRT와 삭제능을 가지지 않는 첨단을 가진 NRT 사이에도 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 이상의 연구결과를 통해 볼 때, 실험에 사용된 수종의 Ni-Ti 전동파일들 사이에서 screw-in effect의 차이가 나타날 것으로 보이며. 특히, Ni-Ti 전동파일의 radial lands와 rake angle이 screw-in effect의 차이를 나타낼 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin Nor Am 18:269-296, 1974.
  2. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14:346-351, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
  3. Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using nickel-titanium hand, nickel-titanium engine-driven, and K-flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 21:146-151, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3
  4. Huh YJ, Kim SK. Change in root canal configuration using different file types and techniques. J Kor Acad Conserv Dent 22:291-304, 1997.
  5. Park WK, Lee HJ, Hur B. Shaping ability of nickeltitanium rotary files. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 29(1):44-50, 2004. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.044
  6. Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:228-233, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.92
  7. Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation technique. J Endod 23:503-507, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80310-X
  8. Swartz DB, Skidmore AE, Griffin Jr JA. Twenty years of endodontic success and failure. J Endod 9(5):198-202, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80092-2
  9. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term result of endodontic treatment. J Endod 16(10):498-504, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80180-4
  10. Smith CS, Setchell DJ, Harty FJ. Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy-a fiveyear retrospective study. Int Endod J 26:321-333, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00765.x
  11. Malueg LA, Wilcox LR, Johnson W. Examination of external apical root resorption with scanning electron microscopy. Oral Surg Oral. Med Oral Pathol 82:89-93, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80383-0
  12. Gutierrez JH, Brizuela C, Villota E. Human teeth with periapical pathosis after overinstrumentation and overfilling of the root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study, Int Endod J 32:40-48, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00185.x
  13. Tronstad L, Andreasen JO, Hasselgren G, Kristerson I, Ris T. pH changes in dental tissue after root canal filling with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 7(1):17-21, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80262-2
  14. Nehammer CF. Treatment of the emergency patient. Br Dent J 158:245-248, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805582
  15. Seltzer S, Soltanoff W, Sinai I, Goldenberg A, Bender IB. Biologic aspects of endodontics. Part III. Periapical tissue reaction to root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 26(4):534-546, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(68)90334-4
  16. Peter M., Di Fiore. A dozen way to prevent nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 138;196-201, 2007. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0136
  17. Li UM, Lee BS, Shih CT, Lan WH, Lin CP. Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic test. J Endod 28(6):448-451, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200206000-00007
  18. Gulabivala K, Abdo S, Sherriff M, Regan JD. The influence of interfacial forces and duration of filing on root canal shaping. Endod Dent Traumatol 16;166-74, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016004166.x
  19. Oh SH, Park JK, Hur B, Kim HC. Comparison of screw-in effect of three NiTi file systems used by undergraduates. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 31(6):477-484, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.6.477
  20. Diemer F, Calas P. Effect of pitch length on the behavior of rotary triple helix root canal instruments. J Endod 30(10):716-718, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000125877.26495.69

Cited by

  1. Influence of root canal curvature on the screw-in effect of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canal vol.35, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.5.374
  2. Influence of taper on the screw-in effect of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canal vol.35, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.5.380
  3. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals vol.37, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.215