DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of the Detection of LOB through Reconstruction of an Internal Model

내부 모델의 재구성에 의한 균형상실 검출성능 개선

  • 김광훈 (부산대학교 기계기술연구원) ;
  • 박정홍 (부산대학교 기계공학부) ;
  • 손권 (부산대학교 기계공학부)
  • Received : 2010.06.10
  • Accepted : 2010.07.20
  • Published : 2010.09.01

Abstract

Many researchers have tried to detect the falling and to reduce the injury associated with falling. Normally the method of detection of a loss of balance is more efficient than that of a compensatory motion in order to predict the falling. The detection algorithm of the loss of balance was composed of three main parts: parts of processing of measured data, construction of an internal model and detection of the loss of balance. The internal model represented a simple dynamic motion balancing with two rear legs of a four-legged chair and was a simplified model of a central nervous system of a person. The internal model was defined by the experimental data obtained within a fixed time interval, and was applied to the detecting algorithm to the end of the experiment without being changed. The balancing motion controlled by the human brain was improved in process of time because of the experience accruing to the brain from controlling sensory organs. In this study a reconstruction method of the internal model was used in order to improve the success rate and the detecting time of the algorithm and was changed with time the same as the brain did. When using the reconstruction method, the success rate and the detecting time were 95 % and 0.729 sec, respectively and those results were improved by about 7.6 % and 0.25 sec in comparison to the results of the paper of Ahmed and Ashton-Miller. The results showed that the proposed reconstruction method of the internal model was efficient to improve the detecting performance of the algorithm.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Sadigh, A. Reimers, R. Andersson, and L. Laflamme, “Falls and fall-related injuries among the elderly: a survey of residential-care facilities in a swedish municipality,” J Community Health, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 129-140, Apr. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHE.0000016717.22032.03
  2. N. Noury, P. Rumeau, A. K. Bourke, G. OLaighin, and J. E. Lundy, “A proposal for the classification and evaluation of fall detectors,” Elsevier Masson France IRBM, vol. 29, pp. 340-349, Dec. 2008.
  3. M. J. Gibson, R. O. Andres, B. Isaacs, T. Radebaugh, and J. Worm-Petersen, “The prevention of falls in later life,” Dan Med Bull, vol. 34 (Suppl 4), pp. 1-24, Apr. 1987.
  4. G. Wu, “Distinguishing fall activities from normal activities by velocity characteristics,” J Biomechanics, vol. 33, pp. 1497-1500, Nov. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00117-2
  5. A. A. Ahmed and J. A. Ashton-Miller, “Is a loss of balance a control error signal anomaly? Evidence for three-sigma failure detection in young adults,” Gait and Posture, vol. 19, pp. 252-262, Jun. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00066-3
  6. G. J. Wijlhuizen, A. M. J. Chorus, and M. Hopman-Rock, “The 24-h distribution of falls and person-hours of physical activity in the home and strongly associated among community-dwelling older persons,” Preventive medicine, vol. 46, pp. 605-608, Jun. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.017
  7. Y. S. Oh, W. Y. Park, K. H. Kim, K. O. An, and S. H. Song, “The research of balance strategy and latency between old and adolescent by dynamic posturography,” Korea J of Sports Science, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 959-968, May 2008.
  8. J. H. J. Allum and F. Honegger, “Informations between vestibular and proprioceptive inputs triggering and modulating human balance-correcting response differ across muscles,” Exp Brain Res, vol. 121, pp. 478-494, May 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050484

Cited by

  1. Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Design Variables Related to an Algorithm for Loss of Balance Detection vol.32, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.9718/JBER.2011.32.1.007