DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Glass ionomer cement와 혼합한 mineral trioxide aggregate의 물리적 및 화학적 성질

Physical and chemical properties of experimental mixture of mineral trioxide aggregate and glass ionomer cement

  • 정유나 (전남대학교치의학전문대학원, 보존학교실) ;
  • 양소영 (전남대학교치의학전문대학원, 해부학교실) ;
  • 박범전 (전라남도보건환경연구원) ;
  • 박영준 (전남대학교치의학전문대학원, 재료학교실) ;
  • 황윤찬 (전남대학교치의학전문대학원, 보존학교실) ;
  • 황인남 (전남대학교치의학전문대학원, 보존학교실) ;
  • 오원만 (전남대학교치의학전문대학원, 보존학교실)
  • Jeong, Yu-Na (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Yang, So-Young (Dept. of Oral Anatomy, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Park, Bum-Jun (Jeollanam-do institute of Health and Environment) ;
  • Park, Yeong-Joon (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hwang, Yun-Chan (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hwang, In-Nam (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Oh, Won-Mann (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2010.07.02
  • 심사 : 2010.08.05
  • 발행 : 2010.09.30

초록

연구목적: 본 연구의 목적은 glass ionomer cement (GIC)와 혼합한 mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)의 경화 시간, 압축 강도, 용해도, pH를 평가하고 이것을 MTA, GIC, IRM, SuperEBA와 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 경화 시간과 압축 강도는 ISO 9917, 그리고 용해도는 ISO 6876 기준에 따라 측정하였다. pH는 고체시편 전용 전극이 연결된 pH meter를 이용하여 측정하였다. 결과: GIC와 혼합한 MTA의 경화시간은 MTA보다 유의하게 짧았으며 압축 강도는 7일간 모든 시점에서 다른 재료보다 유의하게 낮았다. GIC와 혼합한 MTA 중에서 1 : 1과 2 : 1 시편의 용해도는 다른 실험군보다 유의하게 높았다. 또한 GIC와 혼합한 MTA의 pH는 혼합직후 2-4의 범위에서 1일 후 5-7 사이로 증가하였다. 결론: GIC와 혼합한 MTA의 경화시간은 MTA에 비해 개선되었으나 압축강도 및 pH와 같은 다른 성질들은 MTA에 비해 오히려 열등한 것으로 밝혀졌다. 임상적 사용이 가능하려면, MTA의 기존 장점을 저해하지 않으면서 단점을 개선하기 위한 적절한 혼합비를 찾아내고 생체친화성을 평가하는 추가적인 연구가 필수적이다.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the setting time, compressive strength, solubility, and pH of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) mixed with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and to compare these properties with those of MTA, GIC, IRM, and SuperEBA. Materials and Methods: Setting time, compressive strength, and solubility were determined according to the ISO 9917 or 6876 method. The pH of the test materials was determined using a pH meter with specified electrode for solid specimen. Results: The setting time of MTA mixed with GIC was significantly shorter than that of MTA. Compressive strength of MTA mixed with GIC was significantly lower than that of other materials at all time points for 7 days. Solubility of 1 : 1 and 2 : 1 specimen from MTA mixed with GIC was significantly higher than that of other materials. Solubility of 1 : 2 specimen was similar to that of MTA. The pH of MTA mixed with GIC was 2-4 immediately after mixing and increased to 5-7 after 1 day. Conclusions: The setting time of MTA mixed with GIC was improved compared with MTA. However, other properties such as compressive strength and pH proved to be inferior to those of MTA. To be clinically feasible, further investigation is necessary to find the proper mixing ratio in order to improve the drawbacks of MTA without impairing the pre-existing advantages and to assess the biocompatibility.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bodrumlu E. Biocompatibility of retrograde root filling materials: a review. Aust Endod J 2008;34:30-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00085.x
  2. Chang SW, Yoo HM, Park DS, Oh TS, Bae KS. Ingredients and cytotoxicity of MTA and 3 kinds of Portland cements. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2008;33: 369-376. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.4.369
  3. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Pitt Ford TR, Kettering JD. Cytotoxicity of four root end filling materials. J Endod 1995;21:489-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80518-2
  4. Huang TH, Yang CC, Ding SJ, Yan M, Chou MY, Kao CT. Biocompatibility of human osteosarcoma cells to root end filling materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;72:140-145.
  5. Kang MK, Bae IH, Koh JT, Hwang YC, Hwang IN, Oh WM. Comparison of Biocompatibility of Four Root perforation repair Materials. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2009; 34:192-198. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.3.192
  6. Koh ET, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR, Torabinejad M. Cellular response to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate. J Endod 1998;24:543-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80074-5
  7. Yun YR, Yang IS, Hwang YC, Hwang IN, Choi HR, Yoon SJ, Kim SH, Oh WM. Pulp response of Mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium sulfate or calcium hydroxide. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2007;32:95-101. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.2.095
  8. Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR, McKendry DJ, Abedi HR, Miller DA, Kariyawasam SP. Histologic assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling in monkeys. J Endod 1997;23:225-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80051-9
  9. Hashem AA, Hassanien EE. ProRoot MTA, MTAAngelus and IRM used to repair large furcation perforations: sealability study. J Endod 2008;34:59-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.007
  10. Kogan P, He J, Glickman GN, Watanabe I. The effects of various additives on setting properties of MTA. J Endod 2006;32:569-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.006
  11. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod 1995;21:349-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80967-2
  12. Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, Felippe WT, Tanomaru Filho M, Esberard RM. The influence of calcium chloride on the setting time, solubility, disintegration, and pH of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement with a radiopacifier. J Endod 2009;35:550-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.018
  13. Vasudev SK, Goel BR, Tyagi S. Root end filling materials-a review. Endodontology 2003;15:12-18.
  14. Wiltbank KB, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Effect of selected accelerants on the physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Endod 2007;33:1235-1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.016
  15. Gandolfi MG, Perut F, Ciapetti G, Mongiorgi R, Prati C. New Portland cement-based materials for endodontics mixed with articaine solution: a study of cellular response. J Endod 2008;34:39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.001
  16. Antunes Bortoluzzi E, Juarez Broon N, Antonio Hungaro Duarte M, de Oliveira Demarchi AC, Monteiro Bramante C. The use of a setting accelerator and its effect on pH and calcium ion release of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement. J Endod 2006;32:1194-1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.018
  17. Huang TH, Shie MY, Kao CT, Ding SJ. The effect of setting accelerator on properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2008;34:590-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.002
  18. Holland R, Mazuqueli L, de Souza V, Murata SS, Dezan Junior E, Suzuki P. Influence of the type of vehicle and limit of obturation on apical and periapical tissue response in dogs' teeth after root canal filling with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2007;33:693-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.005
  19. Karimjee CK, Koka S, Rallis DM, Gound TG. Cellular toxicity of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with an alternative delivery vehicle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:115-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.020
  20. De Bruyne MA, De Moor RJ. The use of glass ionomer cements in both conventional and surgical endodontics. Int Endod J 2004;37:91-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00769.x
  21. Costa CA, Hebling J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hanks CT. In vitro cytotoxicity of glass-ionomer cements. Biomater 2003;24:3853-3858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00253-9
  22. International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry-Water-based cements-Part 1: Powder/liquid acid-base cements. ISO 9917-1. 2007.
  23. Ber BS, Hatton JF, Stewart GP. Chemical modification of ProRoot MTA to improve handling characteristics and decrease setting time. J Endod 2007;33:1231-1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.012
  24. International Organization for Standardization. Dental root canal sealing materials. ISO 6876. 2001.
  25. Chng HK, Islam I, Yap AU, Tong YW, Koh ET. Properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod 2005;31:665-668. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000157993.89164.be
  26. Dammaschke T, Gerth HU, Zu chner H, Schafer E. Chemical and physical surface and bulk material characterization of white ProRoot MTA and two Portland cements. Dent Mater 2005;21:731-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.019
  27. Nandini S, Ballal S, Kandaswamy D. Influence of glass-ionomer cement on the interface and setting reaction of mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a furcal repair material using laser Raman spectroscopic analysis. J Endod 2007;33:167-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.010
  28. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. Fifth Edition, Mosby Elsevier;2005.p215-220.
  29. Poggio C, Lombardini M, Alessandro C, Simonetta R. Solubility of root-end-filling materials: a comparative study. J Endod 2007;33:1094-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.021
  30. Duarte MA, Demarchi AC, Yamashita JC, Kuga MC, Fraga Sde C. pH and calcium ion release of 2 root-end filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:345-347. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.12
  31. Santos AD, Moraes JC, Araujo EB, Yukimitu K, Valerio Filho WV. Physico-chemical properties of MTA and a novel experimental cement. Int Endod J 2005;38:443-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00963.x
  32. Owadally ID, Pitt Ford TR. Effect of addition of hydroxyapatite on the physical properties of IRM. Int Endod J 1994;27:227-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1994.tb00260.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Synthesis and Properties of a New Dental Material Based on Nano-Structured Highly Active Calcium Silicates and Calcium Carbonates vol.11, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12070
  2. Endodontic management of a maxillary lateral incisor with dens invaginatus and external root irregularity using cone-beam computed tomography vol.37, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.50
  3. Evaluation of the effect of blood contamination on the compressive strength of MTA modified with hydration accelerators vol.38, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.3.128
  4. Do conventional glass ionomer cements release more fluoride than resin-modified glass ionomer cements? vol.40, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.209