Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of moisture on sealing ability of root canal filling with different types of sealer through the glucose penetration model

수종의 실러를 이용한 근관 충전 시 근관 내 수분이 치근단 폐쇄효과에 미치는 영향

  • Jang, Jin-Ah (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Lyang (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Her, Mi-Ja (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Yu, Mi-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry)
  • 장진아 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김희량 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 허미자 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이광원 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 유미경 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Received : 2010.06.10
  • Accepted : 2010.07.28
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: To compared the effect of different levels of moisture of root canal on the sealing ability after filling with four different types of sealer. Materials and Methods: Single-rooted teeth (n = 90) instrumented to and apical size of 0.06 / 45 were randomly assigned to 12 experimental groups (n = 7 per group), positive/negative control groups (n = 3 per group). The teeth of the experimental groups (a. DRY; b. PAPER POINT DRY; c. WET) were obturated with sealer (Group 1-3: Sealapex; Group 4-6: AH plus; Group 7-9: Tubuli-seal; Group 10-12: EndoRez) and warm vertical compaction method. After 7 days in $37^{\circ}C$, 100% humidity, the coronal-to-apical microleakage was evaluated quantitatively using a glucose leakage model. The leaked glucose concentration was measured with spectrophotometer at 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 30 days. Data were recorded ad mmol/L and statistically analysed with the two-way ANOVA and Duncan test (p = 0.05). Results: Throughout the experimental period Tubuli-seal/WET (Group 9) showed the highest mean cumulative glucose penetration (178.75 mmol/L), whereas AH plus/DRY (Group 4) had the least (20.78 mmol/L). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated that the moisture condition of root canals at the time of obturation and the type of sealer that was used had a significant effect on leakage and sealing ability. Thus drying procedure according to sealer types is a critical step and should not be missed in endodontic treatment.

연구목적: 본 연구의 목적은 수종의 sealer를 이용하여 각기 다른 양의 잔여수분이 존재하는 근관을 충전 시, 근관충전의 sealing ability를 glucose leakage model로 평가하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 발치된 90개의 단근치를 치관부를 잘라내고 #45 / 0.06 taper까지 확대한 후, 12개의 실험군 (n = 7)과 2개의 대조군 (n = 3)으로 나누었다. 실험군을 3가지 습윤 상태에서 (a, DRY; b, PAPER POINT DRY; c, WET) 4종류의 sealer로 (Group 1-3: Sealapex; Group 4-6: AH plus; Group 7-9: Tubuli-seal; Group 10-12: EndoRez), warm vertical compaction method를 이용해 충전하였다. $37^{\circ}C$, 습도 100%에서 7일 동안 보관하고 glucose leakage model을 이용하여 치관부로부터 치근부 방향의 미세누출을 정량화하였다. 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 30일 째 누출된 glucose의 농도를 spectrophotometer로 측정하였다. 결과: 관찰기간 동안 AH plus/DRY군 (Group 4)이 12개 그룹 중 가장 적은 양의 leakage를 보였다 (20.78 mmol/L). 반면에 Tubuli-seal/WET군 (Group 9)이 12개 그룹 중 가장 높은 양의 leakage를 보였다 (178.75 mmol/L). 결론: 본 연구의 결과는 충전 시 근관 내의 습윤 상태와 sealer 종류가 microleakage에 유의한 영향을 미친다는 것을 입증하였다. 그러므로 sealer 종류에 따라 각기 다른 근관 건조 방법을 사용하는 것이 근관치료에서 더 좋은 결과를 얻을 수 있는 방법일 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Siqueira JF, Ro¸cas IN, Lopes HP, de Uzeda M Coronal leakage of two root canal sealers containing calcium hydroxide after exposure to human saliva. J Endod 1999;25:14-16.
  2. Glickman G, Gutmann J. Contemporary perspectives on canal obturation. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 327-340.
  3. Ingle J, Taintor J. Endodontics 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985 ,p223-225.
  4. Walton R, Torabinejad M. Principles and practice of endodontics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1989, p421.
  5. Limkangwalmonkol S, Burtscher P, Abbott PV, Sandler AB, Bishop BM. A comparative study of the apical leakage of four root canal sealers and laterally condensed gutta-percha. J Endod 1991;17:495-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81797-8
  6. Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR. Leakage of four root canal sealers at different thicknesses. Int Endod J 1994;27:304-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1994.tb00273.x
  7. Himel VT, McSpadden JT, Goodis HE. Instruments, materials, and devices. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 9th edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2005, p.233-289.
  8. Madison S, Wilcox L. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part III. In vivo study. J Endod 1988;14:458-461.
  9. Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. 5th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1991, p207.
  10. Weine F. Endodontic therapy. 3rd ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1982, p341.
  11. Lee JK, Park SH, Choi GW. Time-dependent effects of EDTA application on removal of smear layer in the root canal system. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2006;31:169-178. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.3.169
  12. Xu Q, Fan MW, Fan B, Cheung GS, Hu HL. A new quantitative method using glucose for analysis of endodontic leakage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:107-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.006
  13. Pommel L, Camps J. Effects of pressure and measurement time on the fluid filtration method in endodontics. J Endod 2001;27:256-258. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200104000-00003
  14. Yu YS, Kim TK, Lee KW, Yu MK. Evaluation of sealing ability of root fillings without smear layer by soft chelating irrigation. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2009;34: 484-485. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.484
  15. Shemesh H, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings with and without smear layer using two different leakage models: a two-month longitudinal ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2006;39:968-976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01181.x
  16. Wu M. K., Wesselink P. R. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, Application and relevance. Int Endod J 1993;26:37-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00540.x
  17. Rao P, Pattabiraman, T.N. Reevaluation of the phenolsulfuric acid reaction for the estimation of hexoses and pentoses. Anal. Biochem. 1989;189:18-22.
  18. Horning TG, Kessler JR. A comparison of three different root canal sealers when used to obturate a moisture-contaminated root canal system. J Endod 1995; 21:354-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80968-4
  19. Tagger M, Tagger E, Kfir A. Release of calcium and hydroxyl ions from set endodontic sealers containing calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1988;14:588-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80055-4
  20. Oguntebi BR, Shen C. Effect of different sealers on thermoplasticized gutta-percha root canal obturations. J Endod 1992;18:363-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81219-7
  21. Schafer E, Zandbiglari T. Solubility of root-canal sealers in water and artificial saliva. Int Endod J 2003;36: 660-669. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00705.x
  22. Roggendorf MJ, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger. Influence of moisture on the apical seal of root canal fillings with five different types of sealer. J Endod 2007;33:31-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.006
  23. Zmener O, Spielberg C, Lambergghini F, Rucci M. Sealing properties of a new epoxy resin-based rootcanal sealer. Int Endod J 1997;30:332-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00719.x
  24. Orstavik D, Nordahl I, Tibballs JE. Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials. Dent Mater 2001;17:512-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00011-2
  25. Barnett F, Trope M, Rooney J, Tronstak L. In vivo sealing ability of calcium hydroxide containing root canal sealers. Endod Dent Traumatol 1989;5:23-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1989.tb00332.x
  26. Zidan O & ElDeeb M. The use of dentnal bonding agent as a root canal sealer. J Endod 1985;11:176-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80142-4
  27. Markowitz K, Moynihan M, Liu M, Kim S. Biologic properties of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. A clinically oriented review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:729-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(92)90020-Q
  28. Peters DD. Two-year in vitro solubility evaluation of four gutta-percha sealer obturation techniques. J Endod 1986;12:139-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80051-6
  29. Kuhre A, Kessler J. Effect of moisture on the apical seal of laterally condensed gutta percha. J Endod 1993;19:277-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80456-5
  30. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, et al. Ultrastructural evaluation of the apical seal in roots filled with a polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material. J Endod 2005;31:514-519. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000152298.81097.b7
  31. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Monticelli F, et al. Effectiveness of resin-coated gutta-percha cones and a dual-cured, hydrophilic methacrylate-based sealer in obturating root canals. J Endod 2000;31:659-664. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000171942.69081.53
  32. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Serrano SA, Vidueira M, Macchi RI. Significance of moist root canal dentin with the use of methacrylate-based endodontic sealers: an in vitro coronal dye leakage study, J Endod 2008;34: 76-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.012
  33. Wong Y. Spencer P. Continuity etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res 2005;84: 350-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400411

Cited by

  1. Quantitative microleakage analysis of root canal filling materials in single-rooted canals vol.37, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21204
  2. study vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.17