The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제2권2호
  • /
  • Pages.39-45
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An effect of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of resin cement to porcelain restoration

  • Choi, Yu-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2010.04.21
  • 심사 : 2010.06.17
  • 발행 : 2010.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to determine differences in shear bond strength to human dentin using immediate dentin sealing (IDS) technique compared to delayed dentin sealing (DDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty extracted human molars were divided into 4 groups with 10 teeth each. The control group was light-cured after application of dentin bonding agent ($Excite^{(R)}$ DSC) and cemented with $Variolink^{(R)}$. II resin cement. IDS/SE (immediate dentin sealing, $Clearfil^{TM}$ SE Bond) and IDS/SB (immediate dentin sealing, $Adapter^{TM}$ Single Bond 2) were light-cured after application of dentin bonding agent ($Clearfil^{TM}$ SE Bond and $Adapter^{TM}$ Sing Bond 2, respectively), whereas DDS specimens were not treated with any dentin bonding agent. Specimens were cemented with $Variolink^{(R)}$. II resin cement. Dentin bonding agent ($Excite^{(R)}$. DSC) was left unpolymerized until the application of porcelain restoration. Shear strength was measured using a universal testing machine at a speed of 5 mm/min and evaluated of fracture using an optical microscope. RESULTS. The mean shear bond strengths of control group and IDS/SE group were not statistically different from another at 14.86 and 11.18 MPa. Bond strength of IDS/SE group had a significantly higher mean than DDS group (3.14 MPa) (P < .05). There were no significance in the mean shear bond strength between IDS/SB (4.11 MPa) and DDS group. Evaluation of failure patterns indicates that most failures in the control group and IDS/SE groups were mixed, whereas failures in the DDS were interfacial. CONCLUSION. When preparing teeth for indirect ceramic restoration, IDS with $Clearfil^{TM}$ SE Bond results in improved shear bond strength compared with DDS.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:111-21.
  2. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999;24:147-55.
  3. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992;17:13-20.
  4. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690100501
  5. McCabe JF, Rusby S. Dentine bonding-the effect of pre-curing the bonding resin. Br Dent J 1994;176:333-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808447
  6. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033-42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x
  7. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, L¨uthy H, Sch¨arer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: effect on bond strength. Am J Dent 1996;9:115-9.
  8. Paul SJ, Sch¨arer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:536-45.
  9. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:144-54.
  10. Ozturk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:275-81. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.37
  11. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:105-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00325.x
  12. Paul SJ, Sch¨arer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:8-14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00484.x
  13. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 2003;28:28-35.
  14. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Garberoglio R, Davidson CL. Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. Am J Dent 1996;9:57-60.
  15. Dumfahrt H, Sch¨affer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part IIClinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:9-18.
  16. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure-a clinician's observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:625-8.
  17. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Dual-cure luting composites: Part I: Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:133-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01597.x
  18. Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:325-30. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359509005995
  19. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:511-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
  20. Magne P, Perroud R, Hodges JS, Belser UC. Clinical performance of novel-design porcelain veneers for the recovery of coronal volume and length. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:440-57.
  21. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:166-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3
  22. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C, Rueggeberg FA, Foulger S, Saito T, Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005;26:6449-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.052
  23. Lee SY, Greener EH, Covey DA, Menis DL. Effects of food/oral simulating fluids on microstructure and strength of dentine bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:353-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00864.x
  24. Miyazaki M, Ando S, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater 1995;11:234-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80055-7
  25. Kanca J 3rd. Resin bonding to wet substrate. 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992;23:39-41.
  26. Ferrari M, Tay FR. Technique sensitivity in bonding to vital, acidetched dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28:3-8.
  27. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73:1212-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730061301
  28. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996;12:236-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80029-7
  29. Burrow MF, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Water sorption of several bonding resins. Am J Dent 1999;12:295-8.
  30. Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:316-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00060.x
  31. Papacchini F, Dall'Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:25-31.

피인용 문헌

  1. The effect of IDS (immediate dentin sealing) on dentin bond strength under various thermocycling periods vol.7, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.224
  2. Interactions between resin-based temporary materials and immediate dentin sealing vol.4, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40563-016-0061-9
  3. Removal of temporary cements following an immediate dentin hybridization approach: a comparison of mechanical and chemical methods for substrate cleaning vol.32, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1381015
  4. Cementation of Glass-Ceramic Posterior Restorations: A Systematic Review vol.2015, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/148954
  5. Immediate Dentin Sealing with Self-etch Dentin Bonding Agent for Indirect Restoration vol.8, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1492
  6. Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review vol.13, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2147/ccide.s307939
  7. Significance of immediate dentin sealing and flowable resin coating reinforcement for unfilled/lightly filled adhesive systems vol.33, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12700
  8. Water-Airborne-Particle Abrasion as a Pre-Treatment to Improve Bioadhesion and Bond Strength of Glass–Ceramic Restorations: From In Vitro Study to 15-Year Survival Rate vol.14, pp.17, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174966
  9. Substantial in-vitro and emerging clinical evidence supporting immediate dentin sealing vol.57, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.05.004