The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics (응용통계연구)

The Korean Statistical Society (한국통계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Value at Risk Forecasting Based on Quantile Regression for GARCH Models

  • Lee, Sang-Yeol (Department of Statistics, Seoul National University) ;
  • Noh, Jung-Sik (Department of Statistics, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 20100500
  • Accepted : 20100700
  • Published : 2010.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Value-at-Risk(VaR) is an important part of risk management in the financial industry. This paper present a VaR forecasting for financial time series based on the quantile regression for GARCH models recently developed by Lee and Noh (2009). The proposed VaR forecasting features the direct conditional quantile estimation for GARCH models that is well connected with the model parameters. Empirical performance is measured by several backtesting procedures, and is reported in comparison with existing methods using sample quantiles.

Keywords

References

  1. Berkowitz, J., Christoffersen, P. and Pelletier, D. (2009). Evaluating Value-at-Risk models with desk-level data, Management Science, published online before print.
  2. Chernozhukov, V. and Umantsev, L. (2001). Conditional value-at-risk: Aspects of modeling and estimation,Empirical Economics, 26, 271-292 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810000062
  3. Christoffersen, P. F. (1998). Evaluating interval forecasts, International Economic Review, 39, 841-861. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527341
  4. Engle, R. F. and Manganelli, S. (2004). CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 22, 367-381. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500104000000370
  5. Francq, C. and Zakoian, J. M. (2004). Maximum likelihood estimation of pure GARCH and ARMA-GARCH processes, Bernoulli, 10, 605-637. https://doi.org/10.3150/bj/1093265632
  6. Hartz, C., Mittnik, S. and Paolella, M. (2006). Accurate value-at-risk forecasting based on the normal-GARCH model, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 50, 3032-3052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.06.006
  7. Hull, J. and White, A. (1998). Incorporating volatility updating into the historical simulation method for value at risk, Journal of Risk, 1, 5-19.
  8. Kupiec, P. H. (1995). Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models, Journal of Derivatives, 3, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407942
  9. Lee, S. and Lee, T. (2010). Value at risk forecasting based on Gaussian mixture ARMA-GARCH model, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, In press.
  10. Lee, S. and Noh, J. (2009). Quantile regression estimator for GARCH models, Submitted.
  11. Wurtz, D., Chalabi, Y. and Luksan, L. (2002). Parameter estimation of ARMA models with GARCH/APA-RCH errors an R and SPlus software implementation, Unpublished manuscript.

Cited by

  1. Forecasting value-at-risk by encompassing CAViaR models via information criteria vol.24, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2013.24.6.1531
  2. Quantile Regression Estimator for GARCH Models vol.40, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9469.2011.00759.x