Journal of Biosystems Engineering

Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery (한국농업기계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effective Treatment of Swine Manure with Chinese Cabbage Silage through Two Serial Anaerobic Digestion

돈분과 배추사일리지를 이용한 2조 혐기소화의 효과적인 처리

  • Received : 2010.01.04
  • Accepted : 2010.02.09
  • Published : 2010.02.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The performance of two serial completely stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) for treatment of swine manure (SM) with Chinese cabbage silage (CCS) was studied. The two CSTRs of 41 liters each were connected in series and first reactor was fed swine manure with Chinese cabbage silage in 3:1 proportion by VS basis. The FOS/TAC, methane content (%) and pH were utilized as the parameters for the digester stability control. The FOS/TAC value was found to be effective indicator for instant digester condition. The stability of reactors can be obtained with the FOS/TAC value up to 1.0 with accumulation of FOS value below 10,000 mg/L. Material exchange method was effective in transferring the excess volatile fatty acids (VFA) from the first reactor to the second one and maintaining stability in both the reactors. The biogas yield and the methane yield was 0.55-0.61 and 0.41-0.42 L/g VS fed, respectively, at organic loading rate (OLR) of 2.2-2.6 g VS/L with total HRT of 32 days.

Keywords

References

  1. APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  2. Azbar, N., P. Ursillo and R.E. Speece. 2001. Effect of process configuration and substrate complexity on the performance of anaerobic processes. Water Research 35:817-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00318-3
  3. Baltrenas, P., M. Kvasauskas and A. Y. Waldberg. 2008. Experimental investigation on biogas production using hen manure, fruits and vegetables. Environmental Engineering, 7th International conference. Cited at www.vgtu.lt/upload/leid_konf/ baltrenas_et_al_experimental.pdf. Accessed on 2009-12-30.
  4. Bjornsson, L., M. Murto, T. G. Jantsch and B. Mattiasson. 2001. Evaluation of new methods for the monitoring of alkalinity, dissolved hydrogen and the microbial community in anaerobic digestion. Water Research 35(12):2833-2840. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00585-6
  5. Boe, K. and I. Angelidaki. 2009. Serial CSTR digester configuration for improving biogas Production from manure. Water Research 43(1):166-172 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.09.041
  6. Bouallagui, H., Y. Touhami, R. Ben Cheikh and M. Hamdi. 2005. Bioreactors performance used in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: review. Process Biochemistry 40: 989-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.03.007
  7. Choi, M. H. and Y. H. Park. 2003. Production of Yeast biomass using waste Chinese cabbage. Biomass and Bioenergy 25:221-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00194-0
  8. Chynoweth, D. P., A. C. Wilkie and J. M. Owens. 1998. Anaerobic processing of piggery wastes: A review. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 984101. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
  9. Hashimoto, A. G. 1983. Conversion of straw–manure mixtures to methane at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 25:185-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260250115
  10. Hills, D. J. and D. W. Roberts. 1981. Anaerobic digestion of dairy manure and field crop residues. Agriculture Wastes 3:179-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-4607(81)90026-3
  11. Kaparaju, P. and J. Rintala. 2005. Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure. Resource, Conservation and Recycling 43:175-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.001
  12. Kaparaju, P., L. Ellegaard and I. Angelidaki. 2009. Optimisation of biogas production from manure through serial digestion: Lab-scale and Pilot-scale studies. Bioresource Technology 100:701-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.023
  13. Kepp, U., K. Panter and O.E. Solheim. 2001. High dry solids digestion. In Proc. CIWEM/Aqua. Enviro 6, European Biosolids and Organic Residuals Conf., Wakefield.
  14. Kim, S. H. and R. H. Zhang. 2002. Biological Treatment of Kitchen Food Waste with Sequencing Batch Reactors. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 026054. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
  15. Lehtomaki, A., S. Huttunen and J. A. Rintala. 2007. Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 51: 591-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.11.004
  16. Lossie, U. and P. Pütz. 2008. Targeted control of biogas plants with the help of FOS/TAC. Practice Report. HACH Lange. Cited at www.hachlange.hu/.../HL_FOSTAC_HU_DOC042_ 86_20011_Mar08_web.pdf. Accessed on 20-8-2009.
  17. Mc Carty, P. L. 1964. Anaerobic treatment fundamentals. Public Works Journal (Sept., Oct., Dec. Issue).
  18. Misi, S. N. and C. F. Foster. 2001. Batch co-digestion of multicomponents agro-wastes. Bioresource Technology 80: 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00078-5
  19. Murto, M., L. Bjornsson and B. Mattiasson. 2004. Impact of food industrial waste on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. Journal of Environmental Management 70(2): 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.11.001
  20. Rieger, C. and P. Weiland. 2006. Early detection of process disturbance (Prozessstorungen fruhzeitig erkennen). Biogas Journal, 4/06. Cited at www.biogas-infoboard.de/.../Seiten18- 20%20aus%204-2006_komplett.pdf. Accessed on 20-08-2009.
  21. Sanchez, e., R. Borja, L. Travieso, A. Martín and M.F. Colmenarejo. 2005. Effect of organic loading rate on stability, operational parameters and performance of a secondary upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor treating piggery waste. Bioresource Technology 96:335-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.04.003
  22. Speece, R. E., M. Duran, G. Demirer, H. Zhang and T. DiStefano. 1997. The role of process configuration in the performance of anaerobic systems. Water Science and Technology 36(6):539-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00566-0
  23. WPCF. 1987. Anaerobic Sludge Sludge Digestion. Manual Practice No. 19 second edition. Water pollution Control Federation, Alexandria, VA.
  24. Zhang, R. H., Y. Yin, S. Sung and R. R. Dague. 1997. Anaerobic treatment of swine waste by the anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Transactions of the ASAE 40(3):761-767 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.21307

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of the Biogas Productivity Potential of Fish Waste: A Lab Scale Batch Study vol.37, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.5.302
  2. Kinetic Study of the Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure at Mesophilic Temperature: A Lab Scale Batch Operation vol.37, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.4.233
  3. Serial completely stirred tank reactors for improving biogas production and substance degradation during anaerobic digestion of corn stover vol.235, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.058
  4. Methane Production Potential of Food Waste and Food Waste Mixture with Swine Manure in Anaerobic Digestion vol.37, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.2.100
  5. Anaerobic Digestion Treatment for the Mixture of Chinese Cabbage Waste Juice and Swine Manure vol.37, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.1.058
  6. Different substrates and starter inocula govern microbial community structures in biogas reactors vol.37, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1118559
  7. Emissions of Odor, Ammonia, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Volatile Organic Compounds from Shallow-Pit Pig Nursery Rooms vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2014.39.2.076
  8. Aerobic treatment of liquid swine manure using polymer: Evaluation for ammonia emissions reduction and nitrogen retention vol.9, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2016.01.005
  9. Development and validation of a simplified titration method for monitoring volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion vol.67, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.015