International Journal of Contents

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Leadership in Design Management by Prentice Hall's Self-Assessment

  • Received : 2010.05.11
  • Accepted : 2010.04.13
  • Published : 2010.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper compares and contrasts four different kinds of leadership models in Design Management. Similarities and differences between these four models in contemporary leadership issues and challenges are analyzed and described. Each model will demonstrate the effects of leadership and how these leaders use the different approaches to develop their leadership style in their design field. This paper proposes that contemporary leadership in Design Management involves a unique bonding among leaders and followers, and more flexible and developed leadership will continue in the understanding and skill with which applying to the dynamic of organization change. The results and application of each model's assessment indicate a team of leaders that are capable of achieving excellence through their combined talents and vision to achieve in design fields using their potential inability of their own leadership.

Keywords

References

  1. B. J. Avolio, F. J. Yammarino, Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. San Diego, CA: Emerald, 2002.
  2. W. Antonia, Managing Editor. Managing design in SMEs. DMI Review Article, vol. 20, no.3, 2009.
  3. B. M. Bass, Does the transactional-transformation leadership paradigm transcend organizational boundaries? American Psychologist, vol. 52, no.2, 1997, pp.130-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130
  4. Bass & Stogdill The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, & managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press, 1990.
  5. J. Chen and C. Silverthorne, Leadership effectiveness, leadership style and employee readiness. Retrieved January 6, 2010, from ProQuest, 2005.
  6. J. G. Clawson, Level three leadership: Getting below the surface. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2006.
  7. F. E. Fiedler, A contingency model of leadership, effectiveness, in L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, (1), 1964
  8. R. K. Greenleaf, The servant as leader. In Kouzes, J. (2003). Business leadership: A Jossey-Bass reader (pp. 117-136). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1977.
  9. W. Hill, A situational approach to leadership effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 53, no.6, 1969, pp.513-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028667
  10. A. Nahavandi, The art and science of leadership (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.
  11. Pearson Education, Inc. How good am I at building and leading a team [Online self-assessment]? Pearson Prentice-Hall Self-assessment library. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.
  12. Bruce W. Tuckman, Development Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin vol.63, no.6, 1995.
  13. K. Strang, Examining effective and ineffective transformational project leadership. Team Performance Management, vol.11, no.3/4, 2005, pp.68. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590510606299
  14. J. T. Wren, The leader's companion: Insights on leadership through the ages. New York: The Free Press, 1995.
  15. G. Yukl, Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2010.
  16. The Design Management Institute. Retrieved January 6, 2010, from http://www.dmi.org/dmi/html/aboutdmi/design_managemen.htm, 2009.
  17. L. Thomas, How to become a more design-minded organization. DMI Review Article, vol. 20, no.3, Retrieved January 8, 2010, from http://www.dmi.org/dmi/html/publications/journal/fullabstract_d.jsp?itemID=09203LOC28, 2009.