DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aerosol Observation with Raman LIDAR in Beijing, China

  • Xie, Chen-Bo (Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Composition and Optical Radiation, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Zhou, Jun (Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Composition and Optical Radiation, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Sugimoto, Nobuo (Atmospheric Environment Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies) ;
  • Wang, Zi-Fa (Nansen-Zhu International Research Centre, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
  • 투고 : 2010.06.28
  • 심사 : 2010.07.26
  • 발행 : 2010.09.25

초록

Aerosol observation with Raman LIDAR in NIES (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan) LIDAR network was conducted from 17 April to 12 June 2008 over Beijing, China. The aerosol optical properties derived from Raman LIDAR were compared with the retrieved data from sun photometer and sky radiometer observations in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). The comparison provided the complete knowledge of aerosol optical and physical properties in Beijing, especially in pollution and Asian dust events. The averaged aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 675 nm was 0.81 and the Angstrom exponent between 440 nm and 675 nm was 0.99 during experiment. The LIDAR derived AOD at 532 nm in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) was 0.48, which implied that half of the total AOD was contributed by the aerosol in PBL. The corresponding averaged LIDAR ratio and total depolarization ratio (TDR) were 48.5sr and 8.1%. The negative correlation between LIDAR ratio and TDR indicated the LIDAR ratio decreased with aerosol size because of the high TDR associated with nonspherical and large aerosols. The typical volume size distribution of the aerosol clearly demonstrated that the coarse mode radius located near 3 ${\mu}m$ in dust case, a bi-mode with fine particle centered at 0.2 ${\mu}m$ and coarse particle at 2 ${\mu}m$ was the characteristic size distribution in the pollution and clean cases. The different size distributions of aerosol resulted in its different optical properties. The retrieved LIDAR ratio and TDR were 41.1sr and 19.5% for a dust event, 53.8sr and 6.6% for a pollution event as well as 57.3sr and 7.2% for a clean event. In conjunction with the observed surface wind field near the LIDAR site, most of the pollution aerosols were produced locally or transported from the southeast of Beijing, whereas the dust aerosols associated with the clean air mass were transported by the northwesterly or southwesterly winds.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. T. F. Eck, B. N. Holben, O. Dubovik, A. Smirnov, P. Goloub, H. B. Chen, B. Chatenet, L. Gomes, X. Y. Zhang, S. C. Tsay, Q. Ji, D. Giles, and I. Slutsker, “Columnar aerosol optical properties at AERONET sites in central Eastern Asia and aerosol transport to the tropical Mid-Pacific,” J. Geophys. Res. 110, D06202, doi:10.1029/2004JD005274 (2005).
  2. T. Cheng, H. Wang, Y. Xu, H. Li, and L. Tian, “Climatology of aerosol optical properties in Northern China,” Atmos. Environ. 40, 1495-1509 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.10.047
  3. X. A. Xia, H. B. Chen, P. C. Wang, W. X. Zhang, P. Goloub, B. Chatenet, T. F. Eck, and B. N. Holben, “Variation of column-integrated aerosol properties in a Chinese urban region,” J. Geophys. Res. 111, D05204, doi:10.1029/2005JD006203 (2006).
  4. M. Tesche, A. Ansmann, D. Müller, D. Althausen, R. Engelmann, M. Hu, and Y. Zhang, “Particle backscatter, extinction, and LIDAR ratio profiling with Raman LIDAR in South and North China,” Appl. Opt. 46, 6302-6308 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.006302
  5. C. Xie, T. Nishizawa, N. Sugimoto, I. Matsui, and Z. Wang, “Characteristics of aerosol optical properties in pollution and Asian dust episodes over Beijing, China,” Appl. Opt. 47, 4945-4951 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.47.004945
  6. A. Ansmann, R. Engelmann, D. Althausen, U. Wandinger, M. Hu, Y. Zhang, and Q. He, “High aerosol load over the pearl river delta, China, observed with Raman LIDAR and sun photometer,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L13815 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023094
  7. Z. Liu, N. Sugimoto, and T. Murayama, “Extinction-tobackscatter ratio of Asian dust observed with high-spectralresolution LIDAR and Raman LIDAR,” Appl. Opt. 41, 2760-2767 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.002760
  8. T. Murayama and M. Sekiguchi, “Intercomparison of aerosol optical properties observed by LIDAR, sun/sky photometers and surface in situ measurements during Asian dust event in Tokyo, Japan,” in Proc. The 24th International Laser Radar Conference (Boulder-Colorado, USA, June 2008), pp. 943-946.
  9. X. Yu, B. Zhu, and M. Zhang, “Seasonal variability of aerosol optical properties over Beijing,” Atmos. Environ. 43, 4095-4101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.061
  10. H. Che, G. Shi, A. Uchiyama, A. Yamazaki, H. Chen, P. Goloub, and X. Zhang, “Intercomparison between aerosol optical properties by a PREDE skyradiometer and CIMEL sunphotometer over Beijing, China,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 3199-3214 (2008). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3199-2008
  11. S. Kim, S. Yoon, J. Kim, and S. Kim, “Seasonal and monthly variations of columnar aerosol optical properties over East Asia determined from multi-year MODIS, LIDAR, and AERONET sun/sky radiometer measurements,” Atmos. Environ. 41, 1634-1651 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.044

피인용 문헌

  1. Study of the scanning lidar on the atmospheric detection vol.150, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.08.023
  2. Raman and fluorescent scattering matrix of spherical microparticles vol.50, pp.21, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.004054
  3. An Algorithm to Determine Aerosol Extinction Below Cirrus Cloud from Mie-LIDAR Signals vol.14, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3807/JOSK.2010.14.4.444
  4. Characteristics of aerosol size distribution and vertical backscattering coefficient profile during 2014 APEC in Beijing vol.148, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.020
  5. Observations of aerosol color ratio and depolarization ratio over Wuhan vol.8, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.04.004