Analysis of Family Function and Mental Health State for Low-income Middle-aged Women

순환모델에 근거한 저소득층 중년여성의 가족기능과 정신건강

  • Received : 2010.10.07
  • Accepted : 2010.12.03
  • Published : 2010.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the types of family function and mental health in low-income middle aged women using the circumplex model. Method: A descriptive research design was used. A sample of 116 low income middle aged women participated in the study. The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale III was used to measure the types of family function. Mental health was measured by the SCL. Results: The types of family function identified were balance family (59.4%), extreme family (25.9%), and mid-range family (14.7%). Significant differences were found in mental health by the family cohesion (F=3.44, p=.019) and family adaptability (F=3.31, p=.023). The mental health status of extreme family was better than mid-range family and balanced family, but such result was not statistically significant (F=0.25, p=.783). Conclusion: The Circumplex model's main hypothesis was not empirically supported that extreme family has more problematic than mid-range family and balance family. These findings emphasize the need for the development of a family system model for Korean family.

Keywords

References

  1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
  2. Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., & Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale preliminary report. Psychopharmachology Bulletin, 9(1), 13-28.
  3. Duetz, M. S., Abel, T., & Niemann, S. (2003). Health measures: Differentiating associations with gender and socio-economic status. European Journal of Public Health, 13(4), 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/13.4.313
  4. Jang, H. S., Kim, Y. H., Suh, Y. S., Kim, H. S., Moon, M. H., & Ok, R. (2000). A correlational study on health promoting lifestyle, self-efficacy, family function and menopausal symptoms of climacteric women. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 6(4), 606-618.
  5. Jang, M. H., & Jun, W. H. (2008). Predictors influencing family functioning in adult women. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 17(2), 236-244.
  6. Kim, J. H., & Park, Y. S. (2002). Reliability and validity of FACES III when applied to one and two of the family members. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 32(5), 599-608.
  7. Kim, J. S., & Shin, K. R. (2004). A study on depression, stress and social support in adult women. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 34(2), 352-361.
  8. Kim, J, Y. (2003). A study on the stress and mental health of housewives in the capital and newly satellite cities. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  9. Kim, S. Y. (1998). Developing family function assessment scale by using faces II, III, IV. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Busan National University, Busan.
  10. Kosciulek, J. F. (1996). The circumplex model and head injury family types: A test the balanced versus extreme hypotheses. Journal of Rehabilitation, 62(2), 49-54.
  11. Lee, H. K. (1986). External - internal control. Student Life Research, 5, 41-59.
  12. Lee, J. H. (2007). The effect of middle-aged persons' leisure lifestyle on family function and life satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sejong University, Seoul.
  13. Lee, P. S. (2003). Correlational study among anger, perceived stress and mental health status in middle aged women. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 33(6), 856-864.
  14. Lee, S. Y. (2002). A correlational study on parents' stress and family function of childhood cancer illness department of nursing science. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  15. Lee, Y. M. (2002). The lived experiences of the middle-aged women's anger. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul.
  16. Lee, Y. N. (2008). The relationship between family functioning and health locus of control in an urban area. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  17. Nam, S. D. (2009). The prediction model of mid-life women's family stress and mental health. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  18. North, R. J., Holahan, C. J., Moos, R. H., & Cronkite, R. C. (2008). Family support, family income, and happiness: A 10-year perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(3), 475-83.
  19. Olson, D. H. (1986). Circumplex Model VII: Validation studies and FACES III. Family Process, 25, 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1986.00337.x
  20. Olson, D. H. (1993). Circumplex model of marital and family system: Assessing family functioning. Normal family process. New York: Guilford Press.
  21. Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Theoretical update. Family Process, 22, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00069.x
  22. Park, J. K.(2007). Family stress and anger of middle-aged women. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  23. Park, J. S. (1995). A model for health promoting behaviors in late-middle aged women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  24. Roberts, C. S., & Feetham, S. L. (1982). Assessing family functioning across three areas of relationships. Nursing Research, 31(4), 231-235.
  25. Satir, V. (1983). Conjoint family therapy. California: Palo Alto.
  26. Smith, D. A., & Reid, W. I. (1986). Role expectations and attitudes in dual-earner families. The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 67, 394-402.
  27. Sprusinska, E. (1994). The Family APGAR Index: study on relationship between family function, social support, global stress and mental health perception in women. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 7(1), 23-32.
  28. Stuart, G. W., & Laraia, M. T. (2001). Principles and practice of psychiatric nursing(7th ed). Philadelphia: Mosby.
  29. Thomas, V., & Olson, D. H. (1993). Problem families and the circumplex model: observational assessment using the clinical rating scales (CRS). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19(2), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1993.tb00975.x