DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Qualitative Study of Offshore Outsourcing by Korean Clothing Companies

국내 의류업체의 해외소싱에 대한 질적 연구

  • Hong, Kyung-Hee (Dept. of Home Economics, Education, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Mi (Dept. of Home Economics, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Yang, Jin-Ok (Dept. of Home Economics, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Soo (Dept. of Home Economics, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Yoon-Jung (Dept. of Home Economics, Education, Korea University)
  • 홍경희 (고려대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 김영미 (고려대학교 대학원 가정학과) ;
  • 양진옥 (고려대학교 대학원 가정학과) ;
  • 이지수 (고려대학교 대학원 가정학과) ;
  • 이윤정 (고려대학교 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2010.03.11
  • Accepted : 2010.04.13
  • Published : 2010.04.30

Abstract

This study assumes that Korea's offshore outsourcing is used for diverse purposes such as designing, the supply of raw and subsidiary materials, production, and manufacturing. The purpose for production exists in the beginning stages of development, because it would have grown in scope since the 1990s when offshore outsourcing began in earnest. In this study, in-depth interviews were conducted with 24 firms with an annual production capacity of more than 200,000 pieces among clothing brands for the domestic market, clothing exporters, and promotion agencies. The interviews took place from December 18, 2008 to January 30, 2009. The interviewees were limited to the officers who had the authority to select manufacturers and decide on production volumes. Responses from the in-depth interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. The study results are summarized as follows: First, Korean clothing companies were found to rely on offshore outsourcing (China, North Korea, Vietnam, and Indonesia). Second, offshore outsourcing focused on the purposes for production; however, even fabrics were often outsourced in the case of production in China. Third, the interviewed firms mentioned cost savings, production cost reduction, and labor cost reduction most frequently as the main reasons for offshore outsourcing. Fourth, customs duties were considered most important in offshore outsourcing. Finally, when deciding on foreign manufacturers for offshore outsourcing, the surveyed clothing companies were found to: select manufacturers after market research in their outsourced countries, maintain existing contracts, or consider design capabilities and price quotations of candidate manufacturers.

Keywords

References

  1. 강대경, 윤강술, 최영만. (2000). 국제경영. 서울: 무역경영사.
  2. 강태구. (2000). 글로벌기업경영론. 서울: 무역경영사.
  3. 권영철. (2001). 국제 경영. 서울: 무역경영사.
  4. 문남철. (2003). 한국 섬유 . 의류산업 해외생산입지의 동태성. 지리학연구, 37(4), 409-426.
  5. 박혜정, 이영주, 임숙자. (2003). 글로벌 소싱기지로서의 한국 섬유-의류산업의 현황-. 한국의류학회지, 27(7), 819- 830.
  6. 박홍식. (2008). 개성공단과 국내 의류봉제산업의 나아갈 방향. 패션정보와 기술, 5, 2-9.
  7. 백영하, 박재옥. (2008). 한국 의류산업의 대미 수출현황과 소싱특성. 한국의류학회지, 32(3), 462-473
  8. 봉제업계 새 기지, 하노이. (2007, 11. 20). 실크이너. 자료검색일 2009, 6.28, 자료출처 http://cafe.daum.net/underearpros/FIqJ/4
  9. 육심현, 고애란, 고은주. (2003). 의류기업의 해외소싱 파트너쉽과 소싱과의 관계 연구. 한국의류학회지, 27(9/10), 1124-1133.
  10. 이규옥. (1994). 우리나라 섬유산업의 해외투자 실태에 관한 연구. 동국대학교 경영대학원 석사학위 논문.
  11. 이병주. (2000). 의류업계의 outsourcing 실태에 관한연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  12. 이윤숙, 육심현, 최원경, 이수경, 진병호. (2002). 국내 의류업체의 글로벌 소싱현황과 경쟁력 강화방안. 한국의류학회지, 26(6), 751-762.
  13. 이은미. (2008). 개성공단 의류봉제산업 실태 및 활성화 방안. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  14. 이은주, 권경난. (2001). 한국 의류 및 섬유산업의 경쟁우위향상에 관한 제언. 한국의류학회지, 25(2), 458-569.
  15. 이현아. (2005). 국내 의류업체의 글로벌 소싱현황에 대한 연구-생산부분을 중심으로-. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  16. 이현아, 천종숙. (2007). 국내 의류업체의 생산현황에 대한연구. 복식문화연구, 15(3), 461-471.
  17. 인니에서 날개 짓 하는 한국 봉제산업. (2008, 4. 15). 머니투데이. 자료검색일 2008, 7. 9, 자료출처 http://stock.moneytoday.co.kr
  18. 인도네시아, 미래성장동력 산업을 공략하라. (2008, 1. 25). 글로벌윈도우. 자료검색일 2009, 7.28, 자료출처 http://www.globalwindow.org
  19. 주종국. (2006). 국내 의류기업의 중국 및 베트남 글로벌 직소싱 전략. 건국대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  20. 홍은아. (2004). 캐주얼 브랜드의 Global Sourcing 생산현황에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  21. 中진출 봉제기업 가동율 급감. (2007, 4. 2). 패션인사이트. 자료검색일 2009, 11. 30, 자료출처 http://www.fi.co.kr/
  22. Birou, L. M., & Fawcett, S. E. (1993). International purchasing: Benefits, requirements, and challenges. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29(Spring), 28-37.
  23. Carter, J. R., & Narasimhan, R. (1990). Purchasing in the international marketplace: Implications for operation. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1(2),2-11.
  24. Davis, H. L., Eppen, G. D., & Mattsson, L. (1974). Critical factors in worldwide purchasing. Harvard Business Review, 52(1),81-90.
  25. Dickerson, K. (1999). Textiles and apparel in the international economy (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  26. Grover,V., Cheon, M, J.,& Teng, J. T. C. (1996). The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems function. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 89-116.
  27. Hines, T. (1998). The iceberg theory of cost comparison overseas vs. UK sourcing dilemma, drapers record/apparel challenge conference. London: Bloomberg.
  28. Kotabe, M. (1992). Global sourcing strategy. New York: Quorum Books.
  29. Lee, J. N., & Kim, Y. G. (1999). Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: Conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management Infonnation Systems, 15(4),29-61.
  30. Min, H., & Galle, W. P. (1991). International purchasing strategies of multinational U. S. finns. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27(Sum), 9-18.
  31. Monzka, R. M., & Trent, R. J. (1991). Global sourcing: A development approach. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27(Spring), 2-8.
  32. Newman, R. G. (1989). Single sourcing: Short-term savings versus long-term problems. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 25(Summer), 20-25.
  33. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.
  34. Swamidass, P. M. (1993). Import sourcing dynamics: An integrative perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4),672-690.
  35. Zeng, A. Z. (2000). A synthetic study of sourcing strategies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(5),219-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570010304798